New Ideas in Psychology最新文献_第6页

Growth Mindset Scale: Aspects of reliability and validity of a new 8-item scale assessing growth mindset 成长心态量表：新的 8 项成长心态评估量表的信度和效度

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111

Hermundur Sigmundsson , Monika Haga

{"title":"Growth Mindset Scale: Aspects of reliability and validity of a new 8-item scale assessing growth mindset","authors":"Hermundur Sigmundsson , Monika Haga","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, the psychometric properties of a new scale aimed at quantifying Growth Mindset are explored. Growth Mindset Scale is a quantitative measure which is context independent and simple to administer.</p><p>Growth Mindset Scale was tested on 723 participants between 16 and 85 years of age (mean age = 28.56, SD = 12.14), which allowed for the exploration of feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity.</p><p>The results indicate that the growth mindset scale is applicable for the age studied (16–85). All individual item scores showed a positive correlation with the total score and ranged between 0.45 and 0.63. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.83 for the standardized items. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the total score of the Growth Mindset Scale and the total score of Theories of intelligence scale was <em>r</em> = 0.168 (<em>p</em> < 0.001).</p><p>These encouraging results assure additional improvement of the growth mindset scale, involving normalization based on a larger, representative sample.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000394/pdfft?md5=915ddde2c88d3401d661e231c58313ee&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000394-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142041011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

New insights into the contributions of playfulness to dealing with stress at work: Correlates of self- and peer-rated playfulness and coping strategies 游戏性对应对工作压力贡献的新见解：自我和同伴评价的游戏性与应对策略的相关性

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109

Nancy Tandler , Stanley Schilling-Friedemann , Leslie D. Frazier , Rebekka Sendatzki , René T. Proyer

{"title":"New insights into the contributions of playfulness to dealing with stress at work: Correlates of self- and peer-rated playfulness and coping strategies","authors":"Nancy Tandler , Stanley Schilling-Friedemann , Leslie D. Frazier , Rebekka Sendatzki , René T. Proyer","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101109","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Playfulness is an individual difference variable that enables people to experience and (re)frame situations of everyday life as interesting, entertaining, and/or stimulating. This definition is consistent with a structural model that includes four different playfulness facets: other-directed, lighthearted, intellectual, and whimsical playfulness. In the work context, playfulness has been shown to be related with various outcomes such as innovative behavior or intrinsic goals. We tested adult playfulness' associations with coping strategies employed at work and whether these coping strategies help to transfer the expected association between playfulness and employees' life satisfaction. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 185; nursery school trainees) provides support for our hypothesis that playfulness is associated with more positive and less negative coping strategies when being confronted with general and work-specific stress. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 355; employees from various working fields) confirms our results from study 1 by demonstrating that playfulness is related to adaptively coping with work stress. Further, study 2 shows that some playfulness facets were positively related to life satisfaction and that these associations were transferred by coping less negatively with work stress and, to some degree, also by utilizing positive control strategies. Overall, our findings indicate that adults' playfulness is of importance for coping with stress at work and to further explain employees’ life-satisfaction. Directions for future research on playfulness in the work place are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000370/pdfft?md5=7b39049c766e51f8ec9f2a274a3925dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000370-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141998479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The replication crisis as mere indicator of two fundamental misalignments: Methodological confirmation bias in hypothesis testing and anthropological oversimplification in theory-building 复制危机仅仅是两个基本失调的指标：假设检验中的方法论确认偏差和理论构建中的人类学过度简化

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110

Julia Schnepf , Norbert Groeben

{"title":"The replication crisis as mere indicator of two fundamental misalignments: Methodological confirmation bias in hypothesis testing and anthropological oversimplification in theory-building","authors":"Julia Schnepf , Norbert Groeben","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychological research is currently in a phase of transition. The replication crisis has led to the introduction of a number of corrective measures such as preregistration, registered reports, open data and methods in order to make scientific knowledge in psychological science more reliable. In this article, we discuss why these tools remain superficial and provide rather a symptom treatment than a deeper treatment of the causes of the replication crisis. To this end, we address two central misalignments of current psychological research: Confirmation bias, in the sense of overweighting significant, hypothesis-confirming findings over negative ones, and the anthropological oversimplification of the human research subject. We conclude by providing indications of how a paradigm shift in psychological science research and publication practices can help to combat the causes of the replication crisis and poor scientific research practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000382/pdfft?md5=bcd1563df1855cd59470e6a23d9e3c8b&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000382-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141945260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Critique of the standard model of moral injury 对道德伤害标准模式的批判

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107

Christa Davis Acampora , Ditte Munch-Jurisic , Andrew Culbreth , Sarah Denne , Jacob Smith

{"title":"Critique of the standard model of moral injury","authors":"Christa Davis Acampora , Ditte Munch-Jurisic , Andrew Culbreth , Sarah Denne , Jacob Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101107","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article seeks to describe in general terms what has become the standard way of conceptualizing moral injury in the clinical psychological and psychiatric literature, which is the key source for applications of the concept in other domains. What we call “the standard model” draws on certain assumptions about beliefs, mental states, and emotions as well as an implicit theory of causation about how various forms of harm arise from certain experiences or “events” that violate persons’ moral beliefs and systems. Our analysis makes these assumptions more explicit and subjects them to critical scrutiny. In so doing, we survey the current literature and identify basic features of how moral injuries are defined, how they are thought to occur, and the forms of treatment or repair that appear to be indicated. We caution that it matters how moral experience is characterized and argue that an alternative understanding of what is the <em>moral</em> in moral injury is important for overcoming critical challenges to the standard model. Moreover, recently evolving approaches to moral repair could be more consistent with an alternative model. Our concluding suggestion is that a more robust account of the nature of moral experience and its relations to self-identity and social experience more generally could advance understanding of the etiology of moral injury and promote rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000357/pdfft?md5=48f4ec2be9ea51674109f170978974c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000357-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141777431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Making sense of the modularity debate 模块化辩论的意义

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108

Jonathan Egeland

{"title":"Making sense of the modularity debate","authors":"Jonathan Egeland","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For several decades scientists and philosophers studying how the mind works have debated the issue of modularity. Their main disagreements concern the massive modularity hypothesis, according to which all (or most) of our cognitive mechanisms are modular in nature. Pietraszewski and Wertz (2022) have recently suggested that the modularity debate is based on a confusion about the levels of analysis at which the mind can be explained. This article argues that their position suffers from three major problems: (1) the argument is unsound, with untrue premises; (2) it glosses over important empirical issues; and (3) the guidelines it offers are not sufficient for avoiding future confusions. As these criticisms are developed, this article will provide a way of making sense of the modularity debate—with an eye for what really is at stake both conceptually and empirically—and, by identifying a false assumption often shared by proponents and opponents of the massive modularity hypothesis alike, it will sketch out some guidelines for moving the debate forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000369/pdfft?md5=fe86b4fd82e2841e1af691f00ef5651f&pid=1-s2.0-S0732118X24000369-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141541434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Refining the prevalence inflation hypothesis: Disentangling overinterpretation from self-fulfilling prophecies 完善普遍通货膨胀假说：将过度解读与自我实现的预言区分开来

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101106

Isaac L. Ahuvia

引用次数: 0

Researching causal relationships from the first-person perspective. An Expansion of the micro-phenomenological method 从第一人称视角研究因果关系。微观现象学方法的扩展

IF 2.3 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101105

Terje Sparby

引用次数: 0

Allport, Aristotle and Aquinas: An interdisciplinary definition of personality 奥尔波特、亚里士多德和阿奎那：跨学科的人格定义

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101096

Juan Pablo Rojas-Saffie , Nicolás García-Matte , Vicente Silva-Beyer

引用次数: 0

Using artworks to understand human memory and its neural mechanisms 利用艺术作品了解人类记忆及其神经机制

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101095

Wei Liu , JinPeng Guo , Hongxiao Li

引用次数: 0

When sensitivity means strength: Distinguishing between soft and hard threats as part of the personality 当敏感意味着力量区分作为人格一部分的软威胁和硬威胁

IF 2.6 3区心理学

New Ideas in Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101094

Marija Eterović

引用次数: 0