当敏感意味着力量区分作为人格一部分的软威胁和硬威胁

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marija Eterović
{"title":"当敏感意味着力量区分作为人格一部分的软威胁和硬威胁","authors":"Marija Eterović","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some people are more sensitive to environmental threats that are easier to objectify and are generally accepted as serious - <em>hard threats</em>, while others are more sensitive to threats that are more subjective, peculiar, and less predictable - <em>soft threats</em>. Defensive denial of distress creates an illusion of mental health and seems to be related to sensitivity to hard threats. People sensitive to soft threats may be more resilient to hard threats. Data from outpatient visits in the aftermath of the 2020 Zagreb earthquake support these hypotheses and could explain why various patient populations (manifestly distressed) seem to cope better with pandemics and natural disasters (sample examples of hard threats) than the general population which consists of genuinely healthy people and those with illusory mental health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When sensitivity means strength: Distinguishing between soft and hard threats as part of the personality\",\"authors\":\"Marija Eterović\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Some people are more sensitive to environmental threats that are easier to objectify and are generally accepted as serious - <em>hard threats</em>, while others are more sensitive to threats that are more subjective, peculiar, and less predictable - <em>soft threats</em>. Defensive denial of distress creates an illusion of mental health and seems to be related to sensitivity to hard threats. People sensitive to soft threats may be more resilient to hard threats. Data from outpatient visits in the aftermath of the 2020 Zagreb earthquake support these hypotheses and could explain why various patient populations (manifestly distressed) seem to cope better with pandemics and natural disasters (sample examples of hard threats) than the general population which consists of genuinely healthy people and those with illusory mental health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有些人对那些更容易客观化、被普遍认为是严重的环境威胁--硬威胁--更敏感,而有些人则对那些更主观、更特殊、更难预测的威胁--软威胁--更敏感。对痛苦的防御性否认会造成心理健康的假象,这似乎与对硬威胁的敏感性有关。对软威胁敏感的人可能对硬威胁更有承受力。2020 年萨格勒布地震后的门诊数据支持这些假设,也可以解释为什么各种病人群体(明显感到痛苦)在应对流行病和自然灾害(硬威胁的示例)时似乎比由真正健康的人和心理健康虚幻的人组成的普通人群应对得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When sensitivity means strength: Distinguishing between soft and hard threats as part of the personality

Some people are more sensitive to environmental threats that are easier to objectify and are generally accepted as serious - hard threats, while others are more sensitive to threats that are more subjective, peculiar, and less predictable - soft threats. Defensive denial of distress creates an illusion of mental health and seems to be related to sensitivity to hard threats. People sensitive to soft threats may be more resilient to hard threats. Data from outpatient visits in the aftermath of the 2020 Zagreb earthquake support these hypotheses and could explain why various patient populations (manifestly distressed) seem to cope better with pandemics and natural disasters (sample examples of hard threats) than the general population which consists of genuinely healthy people and those with illusory mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信