Journal of Bioethical Inquiry最新文献_第4页

Posthuman Ethics for AI. 人工智能的后人类伦理。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10447-2

R Braidotti

引用次数: 0

"Please, Just Don't Leave Me Alone." A Cry for More Humanity in our Care. “求你了，别丢下我一个人。”呼吁更多的人道关怀。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10450-7

Samuel R Falkson

引用次数: 0

Is this Judaism? The Question of the Consistency of Israeli Policy and Actions in Gaza with Jewish Thought and Ethics : Part 1: Formulating the problem and methodological and hermeneutic considerations. 这是犹太教吗？以色列在加沙的政策和行动与犹太思想和伦理的一致性问题：第1部分：阐述问题和方法论和解释学考虑。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10489-6

Paul A Komesaroff, Jeremiah Z Kenner

{"title":"Is this Judaism? The Question of the Consistency of Israeli Policy and Actions in Gaza with Jewish Thought and Ethics : Part 1: Formulating the problem and methodological and hermeneutic considerations.","authors":"Paul A Komesaroff, Jeremiah Z Kenner","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10489-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10489-6","url":null,"abstract":"There has been much discussion about the tactics used by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) and government in the conflict in Gaza following October 7, 2023, which have caused, among other things, systematic destruction of hospitals and schools, the deaths of large numbers of civilians, including women and children, mass starvation, and denial of humanitarian aid. The Israeli government and IDF have sought to justify their actions using ethical arguments, many of which relate to their proclaimed role as the representatives of the Jewish state and of Jewish culture and history. Arguing from the extensive corpus of Jewish ethical thought, extending back thousands of years, this article poses a simple question: Are the above actions by the Israeli government and IDF in Gaza consistent with the ethical tradition of Judaism and the obligations that flow from it? To answer this question, key texts are analysed, especially the Hebrew Bible and the Talmud, and multiple arguments are examined, taking into account the complexities of context and diverse interpretive theories. The paper is presented in two parts, the first discussing the question and methodological issues and the second providing the data and conclusions. We conclude that the alleged acts of the Israeli government and IDF in Gaza are clearly and directly contrary to the Judaic tradition of ethics as it has developed over the millennia. The conduct of the war cannot truthfully be presented in any meaningful sense as representing, or indeed, consistent with, Jewish culture or ethics. These findings have potentially far-reaching consequences, including for the claimed status of Israel as a Jewish state, the relationship between criticism of the government of Israel and the scourge of antisemitism, and the identity of Jewish people both within and outside Israel.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reflections on Epistemic Injustice to Advance Person-Centred Care Through the Experiences of Persons with Chronic Pain. 反思认识上的不公正，以推进以人为本的护理，通过经验的人与慢性疼痛。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10457-0

Felix Gabathuler, Kristina Würth, Martina Hodel, Andrea Glässel, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Bettina Schwind

{"title":"Reflections on Epistemic Injustice to Advance Person-Centred Care Through the Experiences of Persons with Chronic Pain.","authors":"Felix Gabathuler, Kristina Würth, Martina Hodel, Andrea Glässel, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Bettina Schwind","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10457-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10457-0","url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Persons with chronic pain report that their voices are marginalized in healthcare, despite efforts to achieve person-centred care.Aims and objectives: This study aims to explore the healthcare experiences of persons with chronic pain through the lens of epistemic injustice to advance person-centred care.Method: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional interviews with twenty German-speaking Swiss participants, originally collected as part of the DIPEx Switzerland project, was conducted. Data were examined using thematic analysis.Results: Results revealed two overarching themes. Under Epistemic Challenges, participants felt dismissed, misunderstood, or relegated to passive roles by a system privileging quantifiable measures over subjective experiences. This overreliance on objective data fosters epistemic injustice by discounting patient testimonies and perpetuating systemic inadequacies. Under Epistemic Opportunities, participants reported more effective knowledge exchange when their expertise was acknowledged, empathy was shown, and professionals recognized their own limitations.Conclusions: Findings underscore the need to balance objective assessments with patients' subjective perspectives, recognizing persons with chronic pains as legitimate collaborators. By integrating their lived expertise, healthcare systems may mitigate epistemic injustices and provide more empathetic, effective care.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144745871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Healthcare Justice: Protecting Self-Respect, Not Opportunity. 医疗公正：保护自尊，而不是机会。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10432-9

R Ameresekere

{"title":"Healthcare Justice: Protecting Self-Respect, Not Opportunity.","authors":"R Ameresekere","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10432-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10432-9","url":null,"abstract":"Why is healthcare \"special\" to the extent that it should be distributed more equally than other social goods, as a matter of justice? Norman Daniels claims that healthcare is special because it protects the normal range of opportunities available to us, and therefore can be subsumed under a principle of justice which establishes that opportunity ought to be equally distributed. I argue that subsuming healthcare under such a principle leads to de facto discrimination against certain people in virtue of their healthcare needs. This is because-as a critical discussion of health and healthcare needs importantly illustrates-much of the healthcare that people need simply cannot or does not protect normal species function and therefore does not protect opportunity. And so, such healthcare needs go unfairly unmet on Daniels' view. Instead, I suggest that we ought to subsume healthcare under a principle of equally distributing the social bases of self-respect. Though the healthcare that many of us need cannot protect opportunity, it can still protect our sense of self-respect; as such, those who need such care are entitled to it as a matter of justice on the self-respect view. The self-respect view thus avoids de facto discrimination and ultimately meets healthcare needs more fairly. And because it does so by eschewing a controversial conception of health and healthcare, instead appealing to a conception that appears freestanding with respect to the doctrines that citizens might reasonably disagree about, it better satisfies the requirements of public justification.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144735036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cost-Effectiveness and the Distinction Between Quantitative and Qualitative Disability Discrimination. 成本效益与定量和定性残疾歧视的区别。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10431-w

Lasse Nielsen

引用次数: 0

Why We Should Recognize AI as an Inventor. 为什么我们应该承认人工智能是一个发明家。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10429-4

A S Bayındır, J Danaher

引用次数: 0

Institutionalization of Bioethics in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Mapping. 高校生命伦理制度化：系统映射。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10442-7

G Frez-Pulgar, Y Valdés-Rodríguez, V Negrier-Seguel, F Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, M Caceres-Senn, L Glasserman-Morales, J Hochstetter-Diez

{"title":"Institutionalization of Bioethics in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Mapping.","authors":"G Frez-Pulgar, Y Valdés-Rodríguez, V Negrier-Seguel, F Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, M Caceres-Senn, L Glasserman-Morales, J Hochstetter-Diez","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10442-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10442-7","url":null,"abstract":"Bioethics has become a crucial discipline in higher education. This study aims to understand the institutionalization of bioethics within this field and examine documented initiatives related to its integration. To achieve this, a systematic mapping was conducted using Petersen and Kitchenham's methodology, analysing 444 relevant articles. The results indicate a higher concentration of studies addressing the institutionalization of bioethics at the undergraduate level (40.5 per cent), with fewer publications focused on the postgraduate level (19.4 per cent). Most of the studies are concentrated in the health sciences (81.3 per cent), while the remainder are distributed among the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, and engineering. The analysis revealed a significant lack of studies on comparative practices and the use of replicated experiences (2 per cent), as well as limited evidence on the institutionalization of bioethics research in higher education (10.3 per cent). These gaps underscore the need for further research in these areas. Additionally, the integration of active methodologies and educational technologies has enhanced bioethics programmes (21.4 per cent), fostering more interactive and engaged learning environments. This study highlights a critical gap in the implementation of bioethics based on empirically validated experiences. It proposes the development of an implementation model that adapts these experiences to different educational contexts. Cooperation between institutions and the creation of research networks are recommended as key strategies for sharing best practices, thereby facilitating the more effective and widespread integration of bioethics across various educational settings.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144660941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

It Is Not About AI, It's About Humans. Responsibility Gaps and Medical AI. 这不是关于人工智能，而是关于人类。责任差距和医疗人工智能。

IF 1.5 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10423-w

A Giubilini

引用次数: 0

Worlds Apart, Te Ao Māori and Western Worldviews in Aotearoa, New Zealand. 天壤之别，奥特奥Māori和新西兰奥特罗阿的西方世界观。

IF 1.8 3区哲学

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-025-10439-2

A Hikairo Spelman, B V Dieriks

{"title":"Worlds Apart, Te Ao Māori and Western Worldviews in Aotearoa, New Zealand.","authors":"A Hikairo Spelman, B V Dieriks","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10439-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11673-025-10439-2","url":null,"abstract":"Even though the last war between Tangata Whenua and the Crown ended over 150 years ago, Tiriti obligations and the rights of Tangata Whenua remain largely unaddressed. Significant disparities persist, with limited discourse on effective solutions. The recently introduced Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill highlights enduring challenges in honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi. This manuscript examines Te Ao Māori (the Māori worldview) and Western worldviews in Aotearoa, exploring their profound cultural differences and implications for relationships between Tangata Whenua and Tangata Tiriti. We highlight the holistic, interconnected nature of Te Ao Māori, rooted in whakapapa, and contrast this with the rationalism and compartmentalization of Western traditions. To bridge these worldview differences, we propose a relationship framework grounded in Te Tiriti o Waitangi to promote equitable, respectful partnerships. This framework addresses power imbalances and advocates for a two-worldview methodology that honours the mana of both perspectives. By integrating these approaches, we identify pathways for building stronger, inclusive relationships. This pluriversal approach respects the integrity of both worldviews and offers a foundation for coexistence rooted in mutual respect.","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0