Journal of Cancer Education最新文献

{"title":"\"Paint and Sip for Cancer Prevention\": A Novel Arts-Based Community Engagement Strategy to Advance Cancer Education and Screening in Underserved Individuals.","authors":"Lisa Carter-Bawa, Francis Valenzona, Miriam Lucca-Susana, Gary Kwok, Elan N Shoulders","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02679-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02679-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent disparities in cancer awareness, screening uptake, and early detection disproportionately affect underserved communities in the USA. While traditional health education approaches play a critical role, they often fail to engage historically marginalized populations in culturally resonant ways. Innovative strategies that leverage creativity, trust-building, and community participation are urgently needed. In 2024, the Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) Department at the John Theurer Cancer Center launched \"Paint and Sip,\" an arts-based cancer education series designed to increase engagement and awareness in diverse communities. Events were held in accessible, non-clinical venues and combined guided painting sessions with culturally tailored cancer education, delivered by trained community health workers (CHWs). During natural pauses in the painting process, CHWs led 15-min discussions on cancer prevention topics, including screening guidelines, risk factors, and genetic testing. All participants completed a brief social determinants of health screening questionnaire and were offered patient navigation services to address unmet needs and support screening follow-through. Since its launch, the series engaged 191 participants across multiple community settings. Attendance averaged 25 per event, with strong retention and word-of-mouth promotion. Among participants, 82% were not up to date with cancer screening, and 62% accepted navigation support. Qualitative feedback highlighted the events as \"uplifting,\" \"judgment-free,\" and \"a new way to learn about health without fear.\" CHWs reported increased participant openness and discussion around stigmatized topics. The Paint and Sip model illustrates the promise of arts-based engagement as a novel strategy for advancing cancer education and screening in underserved communities. By embedding creativity into health education, the model fosters trust, enhances message retention, and bridges awareness with action. Further research is warranted to evaluate long-term impact, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144530816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of a Vicarious Trauma e-learning Initiative for Cancer Support Line Workers in the UK.","authors":"Donna Munro, Andrew Killen, Karen Campbell","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02674-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02674-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of vicarious traumatisation (VT) is distinguished from psychological stress concepts of 'burnout', 'compassion fatigue', and 'secondary traumatic stress'. Cancer support line workers may have a heightened risk of VT. Taking education as an intervention for VT, the aim of this study was to capture pre- and post-perceptions of an e-learning intervention for cancer support line workers. To explore cancer support line workers' perceptions of VT pre- and post- e-learning intervention. Ten study participants were surveyed prior to a VT e-learning intervention. Nine study participants completed e-learning, followed by semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised. Five themes emerged: pre-existing understanding of VT, resonance, recognition, refocus self-care, and reflection on the impact of VT experience. Varied levels of understanding of the concept of VT were identified. The module was impactful and increased understanding of VT for most participants. A requirement for formalised VT education, subsequent signposting, and support, was identified. Participants expressed desire for refresher courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144512724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluation of Online Patient Education Materials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Jessica M Weiss, Yasmeen Mahayni, Amir S Steinberg","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the modern healthcare landscape, many patients turn to online platforms for information about their diagnoses and treatment options. This study assessed 14 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) websites for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Fourteen patient-facing US AML websites were searched in Google, selected, and analyzed using the PEMAT criteria. PEMAT is an online resource used to evaluate print materials, with two sections: understandability and actionability. Websites were rated by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies were discussed. Websites were categorized by government, public/private companies, patient advocacy groups, professional societies, and cancer centers. The study analyzed 14 websites on AML education material. The mean \"understandability\" score was 86% (range 77%-100%); government scored the highest, and private/public companies scored the lowest. The mean \"actionability\" score was 63% (range 33%-100%); patient advocacy groups scored the highest, and cancer centers scored the lowest. Most of the AML websites analyzed were easy to understand but lacked material that prompted patients to take action regarding their care. These actions included writing down common questions to ask their physician and inquiring about resources (e.g., support groups, relevant clinical trials, and financial support). This study highlights an opportunity to enhance online patient education material by improving understandability through content summaries and visual aids and improving actionability by adding tools (e.g., planners, checklists) to help patients take control of their disease management, including comprehending treatment options, understanding disease etiology, and managing financial assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Training the Next Generation of Researchers to Advance Cancer Health Equity: Five Years of Experience from the Florida-California Cancer Research, Education and Engagement (CaRE²) Health Equity Center.","authors":"John M Allen, Bereket Mochona, Kinfe Redda, Debra Lyon, Brooke Hensel, John D Carpten, Mariana C Stern, Romonia Renee Reams, Folakemi T Odedina, Diana J Wilkie, Ite A Offringa","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02676-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02676-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority scientists in research is a significant barrier to eliminating cancer health disparities. There is a compelling need to develop a cadre of racially and ethnically diverse, well-trained scientists to effectively meet the nation's biomedical, behavioral, population, and clinical cancer research needs. The Florida-California Cancer Research, Education and Engagement Health Equity Center's program focuses on training this underrepresented workforce. Our center is a tri-institutional collaboration between Florida A&M University, University of Florida, and University of Southern California. Here, we report the organizational structure and initial outcomes of our program to support 130 unique talented, underrepresented individuals in 138 cancer research training positions. Over the past 5 years, we offered the following: (1) a 12-week early and focused exposure of 35 undergraduate students; (2) training and support of 23 postbaccalaureate trainees in a 1-year mentored research and training program; and (3) academic career development, mentorship, and tailored research training opportunities to increase the competitive research capacity for 33 graduate students, 13 post-doctoral scholars, and 34 early-stage investigators. Educators, researchers, policymakers, and community leaders can use our training models to advance equity through excellence in education and research for underrepresented minority populations, ultimately fostering a more just and inclusive society.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.","authors":"Valerie L Armstrong, Kelsey L Grabeel, R Eric Heidel, Christel M McGillicuddy, Polina Zmijewski, Peyton Murdock, John I Lew, Tanaz M Vaghaiwalla","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient education is a critical component of effective medical care; > 50% of patients seek medical information from online sources. The recommended reading level is sixth grade. This study examines reading level of current online educational resources for patients with pheochromocytoma. A review of 50 online patient educational materials related to pheochromocytomas was performed. Using three validated instruments: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Gunning Fog Index (GFI) scores, the reading grade level was calculated, and Spearman correlations were performed to evaluate associations between the reading instruments. Thirty-two online patient educational materials were included. The majority of the materials were from academic and research institutions (47%), followed by general information and overviews (19%), government health resources (9%), cancer-specific organizations (9%), support and advocacy groups (9%), and children's health (6%). There were no patient materials that were written at the appropriate grade level. Materials were above a twelfth-grade reading level in 61% of sources (FRE = 78.2%, SMOG = 40.6%, GFI = 59.4%). There were strong, positive correlations between the three reading instruments utilized in the analysis. Readable educational materials facilitate effective healthcare literacy and empower patients to participate in health care decisions, which is especially important given the complex diagnostic and therapeutic considerations for pheochromocytomas. This study is the first to assess readability of online educational resources for patients with pheochromocytoma and reveals a significant gap in the availability of materials that meet the recommended grade level. Developing online education materials that meet the recommended reading grade level is essential to inform patient education and shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144340578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.","authors":"Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Leveraging NCI-Designated Cancer Centers' Community Outreach and Engagement Infrastructure to Advance Community-Driven Priorities Related to the Social Determinants of Health: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Financial Literacy Educational Intervention.","authors":"Elizabeth G Bouchard, Tameka Brooks, Nikia Clark, Frances Saad-Harfouche, Analisa Wills, Hital Patel, Julia A Devonish, Anurag K Singh","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02669-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-025-02669-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of the Community Outreach and Engagement mission, NCI-designated cancer centers bring important infrastructure related to community-based participatory research and community partnerships that can be leveraged to advance financial well-being as part of their mission to improve cancer population health. As a result, cancer centers offer unique opportunities for financial literacy interventions to address this important social determinant of health. We designed the Rise Up With Roswell intervention, a community-responsive financial literacy education intervention. The goal of this study was to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Rise Up with Roswell intervention. We partnered with community-based organizations to deliver the Rise Up with Roswell intervention. To understand feasibility, we examined the number of people reached, the demographics of people reached, and the financial status of people reached. To examine preliminary efficacy, we examined the change in participant knowledge before and after participating in the intervention. Feasibility: We reached N = 99 participants. Over 30% had a household income below $50,000, 34% had a high school degree or less, 2% were Hispanic, 68% were Black, and 54.5% reported that they or someone in their household had a bank account. Efficacy: Overall pre/post-test scores show significant increases in knowledge (p < .05). The Rise Up with Roswell intervention is a feasible and effective community-based educational intervention for financial literacy. These findings show that leveraging the Community Outreach and Engagement infrastructure of a NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center was an effective strategy to reach high-risk community members and effectively deliver a financial literacy intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrating Knowledge of Modifiable and Non-modifiable Risk Factors: A Comprehensive Framework for Breast Cancer Prevention Practices in Women.","authors":"Maria Teresa Reyes-Chacon, Luis Reyner Lopez-Arellanes, Marie Leiner","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02667-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s13187-025-02667-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women worldwide, with mortality rates disproportionately high in less-developed regions. Effective prevention strategies, including educational initiatives, are crucial. This study explores a comprehensive framework for breast cancer prevention by examining the relationship between awareness of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors and knowledge of preventive practices among women over 20 years of age. A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted from January to June 2022 at a Mexican first-contact center on the Mexico-USA border. A convenience sample of 504 women aged ≥ 20 was surveyed using a self-completed questionnaire covering socio-demographic data, epidemiological data, and questions related to modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors and prevention practices. The sample had a mean age of 41.46 years. Most participants had no family history of breast cancer (77.8%), lived with a partner (73.4%), had children (84.9%), and had breastfed (70.8%). The multiple regression model significantly predicted knowledge of preventive practices (F[8, 495] = 8.793, p < 0.001, adj. R² = 0.110), with knowledge of non-modifiable risks, having children, and breastfeeding contributing significantly. Awareness of non-modifiable risk factors was higher than that of modifiable factors, but overall knowledge of both factors and preventive actions remained low. Effective prevention programs for breast cancer must be grounded in a comprehensive understanding of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, which are essential for designing strategies to address the global burden of the disease. The findings underscore the lack of knowledge about modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors which reduce the possibilities for improving breast cancer prevention. Future research should prioritize investigating the causal relationship between risk factor awareness and preventive behaviors, while also developing targeted interventions. These initiatives should be adaptable to diverse demographic and cultural contexts to ensure broad applicability and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prostate Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices by Medical Doctors in Portugal.","authors":"Raquel Braga, Samantha Morais, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo, Natália Araújo, Nuno Lunet","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02665-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02665-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opportunistic prostate cancer (PCa) screening is common worldwide, with physicians playing an important role in its uptake and consequences. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of family doctors and urologists in Portugal regarding PCa screening. A national online survey was conducted between November 2020 and February 2021. Family doctors and urologists were reached by email through their national medical associations, for a total of 596 and 63 participants from each group, respectively. Urologists considered themselves more updated with PCa screening practices than family doctors (93.0% vs. 73.1%; p < 0.001). Family doctors were more likely to consider older age (97.2% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.025) and smoking (80.6% vs. 31.7%; p < 0.001) as risk factors for PCa. Most urologists reported following the European Association of Urology Guidelines for PCa screening (90.9%), while family doctors preferred the National Guidelines (73.9%). A higher proportion of urologists believed early diagnosis is essential for improving PCa prognosis (92.9% vs. 67.9%; p < 0.001). Urologists were more likely to recommend prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for age group-eligible males (always or almost always: 77.2% vs. 20.4%; p < 0.001) and to perform digital rectal examination (never or rarely: 3.5% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.001). Overall, 65.1% of doctors believed that magnetic resonance imaging could improve the diagnosis of PCa in patients with high PSA levels. Family doctors and urologists differed in their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding PCa screening. The latter are more interventive and believe more in the benefits of PCa screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144327628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy of an Educational Health Intervention for Oral Cancer Aimed at Dentists and Dental Students.","authors":"Gloria Cristina Aranzazu-Moya, Gloria Jeanethe Álvarez Gómez, Eliana Elisa Muñoz López, Yenny M García Tarazona, Gloria Cristina Moreno Abello, Sandra Milena Espitia Nieto, Dora Eugenia Ordoñez Daza, Farley Piedad Aguinaga Rodríguez, Leonor Victoria González Pérez, Claudia Patricia Peña Vega, Zoila Carbonell Muñoz, Sandra Juliana Rueda Velásquez","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02644-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02644-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for implementing standardized training and teaching with respect to oral cancer among dental students and dentists. In a multicenter interventional randomized controlled trial, a total of 660 Colombian dental students and dentists were randomly assigned to one of three groups between September 2022 and August 2023 by means of the random number table method at ten different institutions involved in dental education. With a loss to follow-up rate of 25%, Group 1 consisted of 107 cases, Group 2 consisted of 177 cases, and the control group consisted of 164 cases. The control group did not receive training, whereas Group 1 received a leaflet, and Group 2 participated in a MOOC-based learning approach. The assessment results of the knowledge, attitudes, and practice scores were observed and compared among the three groups of participants before and 2 months after the intervention. Compared with the control group, Group 2 presented significantly higher scores for KAP (P < 0.05). The group also showed greater improvements in terms of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (P < 0.05) than did the control group. Additionally, the KAP scores of the students in Group 2 were significantly higher than those of the dentists. Group 2 also demonstrated a substantially greater size effect in KAP. The implementation of MOOC teaching was shown to positively affect standardized training and teaching related to oral cancer, thereby enhancing academic performance in this area.Trial registration: ISRCTN48708543.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144318555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}