参与患者倡导减少乳腺癌差异:促进乳腺癌研究和参与的机会。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech
{"title":"参与患者倡导减少乳腺癌差异:促进乳腺癌研究和参与的机会。","authors":"Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.\",\"authors\":\"Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将患者倡导者作为专家、共同创造者和决策者纳入乳腺癌(BC)研究,有可能减少乳腺癌健康差距并加强临床研究的实施。然而,患者倡导者通常不包括在整个癌症治疗连续体中。在本研究中,我们研究了患者倡导培训模式的策略,以增加生物医学知识,解决患者健康素养,赋予患者权力,降低获取障碍,促进美国黑人女性乳腺癌差异最大的五个地区的黑人女性参与基因组研究。这是对被招募来完成乳腺癌倡导培训项目的患者倡导者的二次分析。对倡导者进行了以下主题的调查:乳房健康知识、乳腺癌筛查和诊断知识自我效能,以在医疗环境中倡导。在横断面研究设计中,我们使用卡方检验进行双变量分析,比较和描述参与者在完成倡导培训后的调查前后反应。通过频率和方法,我们总结了参与者的人口因素、观念和医疗保健准入障碍,如参与遗传咨询和检测。共有107名(86%)参与者为黑人女性,平均年龄为43岁(8.5 sd)。与培训前的评估相比,完成宣传培训后的乳腺癌知识提高了25%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.

Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信