Jessica M Weiss, Yasmeen Mahayni, Amir S Steinberg
{"title":"急性髓系白血病在线患者教育材料的评价。","authors":"Jessica M Weiss, Yasmeen Mahayni, Amir S Steinberg","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the modern healthcare landscape, many patients turn to online platforms for information about their diagnoses and treatment options. This study assessed 14 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) websites for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Fourteen patient-facing US AML websites were searched in Google, selected, and analyzed using the PEMAT criteria. PEMAT is an online resource used to evaluate print materials, with two sections: understandability and actionability. Websites were rated by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies were discussed. Websites were categorized by government, public/private companies, patient advocacy groups, professional societies, and cancer centers. The study analyzed 14 websites on AML education material. The mean \"understandability\" score was 86% (range 77%-100%); government scored the highest, and private/public companies scored the lowest. The mean \"actionability\" score was 63% (range 33%-100%); patient advocacy groups scored the highest, and cancer centers scored the lowest. Most of the AML websites analyzed were easy to understand but lacked material that prompted patients to take action regarding their care. These actions included writing down common questions to ask their physician and inquiring about resources (e.g., support groups, relevant clinical trials, and financial support). This study highlights an opportunity to enhance online patient education material by improving understandability through content summaries and visual aids and improving actionability by adding tools (e.g., planners, checklists) to help patients take control of their disease management, including comprehending treatment options, understanding disease etiology, and managing financial assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Online Patient Education Materials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M Weiss, Yasmeen Mahayni, Amir S Steinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the modern healthcare landscape, many patients turn to online platforms for information about their diagnoses and treatment options. This study assessed 14 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) websites for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Fourteen patient-facing US AML websites were searched in Google, selected, and analyzed using the PEMAT criteria. PEMAT is an online resource used to evaluate print materials, with two sections: understandability and actionability. Websites were rated by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies were discussed. Websites were categorized by government, public/private companies, patient advocacy groups, professional societies, and cancer centers. The study analyzed 14 websites on AML education material. The mean \\\"understandability\\\" score was 86% (range 77%-100%); government scored the highest, and private/public companies scored the lowest. The mean \\\"actionability\\\" score was 63% (range 33%-100%); patient advocacy groups scored the highest, and cancer centers scored the lowest. Most of the AML websites analyzed were easy to understand but lacked material that prompted patients to take action regarding their care. These actions included writing down common questions to ask their physician and inquiring about resources (e.g., support groups, relevant clinical trials, and financial support). This study highlights an opportunity to enhance online patient education material by improving understandability through content summaries and visual aids and improving actionability by adding tools (e.g., planners, checklists) to help patients take control of their disease management, including comprehending treatment options, understanding disease etiology, and managing financial assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02673-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Online Patient Education Materials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
In the modern healthcare landscape, many patients turn to online platforms for information about their diagnoses and treatment options. This study assessed 14 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) websites for their understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Fourteen patient-facing US AML websites were searched in Google, selected, and analyzed using the PEMAT criteria. PEMAT is an online resource used to evaluate print materials, with two sections: understandability and actionability. Websites were rated by two independent reviewers, and discrepancies were discussed. Websites were categorized by government, public/private companies, patient advocacy groups, professional societies, and cancer centers. The study analyzed 14 websites on AML education material. The mean "understandability" score was 86% (range 77%-100%); government scored the highest, and private/public companies scored the lowest. The mean "actionability" score was 63% (range 33%-100%); patient advocacy groups scored the highest, and cancer centers scored the lowest. Most of the AML websites analyzed were easy to understand but lacked material that prompted patients to take action regarding their care. These actions included writing down common questions to ask their physician and inquiring about resources (e.g., support groups, relevant clinical trials, and financial support). This study highlights an opportunity to enhance online patient education material by improving understandability through content summaries and visual aids and improving actionability by adding tools (e.g., planners, checklists) to help patients take control of their disease management, including comprehending treatment options, understanding disease etiology, and managing financial assistance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.