Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech
{"title":"Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.","authors":"Megan C Edmonds, Maimah Karmo, Belinda Paulicin, Lizzie Wittig, Karla Funez, Ayres Warren, Sue Steele, Amanda Espenshied-Reilly, Shanda Cooper Goff, Virginia Leech","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02645-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inclusion of patient advocates in breast cancer (BC) research as experts, co-creators, and decision-makers has the potential to reduce breast cancer health disparities and enhance the implementation of clinical research. However, patient-advocates are often not included throughout the cancer care continuum. In this study, we examine the strategies of our patient advocacy training model to increase biomedical knowledge, address patient health literacy, empower patients, and lower access barriers, to facilitate participation in genomic research among Black women in five regions in the USA with the highest breast cancer disparities for Black women. This is a secondary analysis of patient advocates who were recruited to complete a breast cancer advocacy training program. Advocates were surveyed on the following topics: breast health knowledge, breast cancer screening, and diagnostic knowledge self-efficacy to advocate in medical settings. In this cross-sectional study design, we conducted a bivariate analysis using chi-square test to compare and describe participants' pre- and post-survey responses after completion of the advocacy training. With frequencies and means, we summarized participants' demographic factors, perceptions, and healthcare access barriers, such as participation in genetic counseling and testing. A total of 107 (86%) participants were Black women, with a mean age of 43 (8.5 sd). Breast cancer knowledge was 25% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre-training assessments (p < .001). Breast cancer screening diagnostic knowledge was 20% higher after completing the advocacy training compared to pre- training assessments (p < .001). Similarly, we saw a 24% increase in participants self-efficacy in medical settings (p < .001). This article provides an overview of training strategies involving patient-advocates' role as needed experts within cancer disparities and cancer research. The advocacy training materials increased breast cancer screening knowledge and willingness to engage in community outreach activities to address breast cancer disparities. Findings from this work highlight the impact of educational training strategies to optimize patient-advocate participation and self-empowerment in cancer control and prevention with a focus on breast cancer related knowledge, mammography screening, and advocacy during medical encounters.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.