Journal of Clinical Densitometry最新文献

{"title":"Opportunistic Screening for Low Bone Mineral Density in Routine Computed Tomography Scans: A Brazilian Validation Study","authors":"Felipe Welter Langer ,&nbsp;Giovanni Brondani Torri ,&nbsp;Fernando Schaffazick ,&nbsp;Guilherme Maia ,&nbsp;Camila Piovesan Wiethan ,&nbsp;Carlos Jesus Haygert ,&nbsp;Marcos Cordeiro d'Ornellas","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101539","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101539","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction/background:</em> Osteoporotic fractures are a major health concern worldwide due to high mortality rates, deterioration in quality of life, and elevated healthcare costs related to hospital treatment. However, most patients who sustain an osteoporotic fracture have never been formally screened for osteoporosis. Opportunistic screening of osteoporosis through conventional computed tomography (CT) scans performed for unrelated reasons could help identify patients with low bone mass. There are currently no studies validating the opportunistic screening of low bone mass through CT in South America. The aim of our study is to assess whether conventional CT scans could be used for the opportunistic screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Brazilian patients.</div><div><em>Methodology:</em> Patients who underwent unenhanced CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans within a six-month interval were assessed retrospectively. Mean CT attenuation was measured in the first lumbar vertebra (L1) in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes and compared to their respective DXA T-scores; vertebral fractures were assessed in the sagittal plane. Potential thresholds suggestive of low bone mass density (BMD) were established using receiver operating characteristics analysis.</div><div><em>Results:</em> 491 patients were included (93.2 % female; mean age of 64.1 ± 9.8 years; mean interval of 63.5 days between scans). Mean L1 CT attenuation was significantly lower in osteopenic and osteoporotic patients in all CT planes (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Positive linear correlations were found between DXA T-scores and the average L1 attenuations in all CT planes (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). An average L1 attenuation equal or below 100 Hounsfield Units (HU) in the sagittal plane identified low BMD (osteopenia or osteoporosis) with a specificity of 96.3 % and a positive predictive value of 96 %. In contrast, an average L1 attenuation above 180 HU demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.6 % and a negative predictive value of 94.9 % for detecting osteoporosis. Patients with L1 sagittal attenuation at or below 100 HU exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of vertebral fractures (prevalence ratio: 8.67; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). An online calculator based on the results of this study is freely available at <span><span>www.osteotc.com.br</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div><div><em>Conclusions:</em> Routine CT scans can identify probable low bone density (osteopenia or osteoporosis) in Brazilian patients without additional costs or radiation exposure. Opportunistic CT screening does not substitute formal bone mineral density assessment; instead, it assists in identifying patients who may benefit from it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Healthy Controls","authors":"Süheyla Doğan Bulut ,&nbsp;Gamze Zengin İspir ,&nbsp;Serdar Bulut ,&nbsp;Emine AK Aygün","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101538","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101538","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Purpose:</em> This study investigated the association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use and the risk of decreased bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.</div><div><em>Methods:</em> Sixty-three patients diagnosed with GAD (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) were treated with venlafaxine or duloxetine from the SNRI group, and sixty patients treated with SSRIs were enrolled. Social demographic features, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS) results, and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) scores of all the patients were assessed. The BMD (bone mineral density) of the patients was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the femoral and lumbar regions. The BMD of the patients was compared with that of 40 healthy controls.</div><div><em>Results:</em> Bone measurements in the SNRI and SSRI users were similar to those of the healthy controls. However, osteopenic values were observed in the SSRI users, while normal bone density was found in the SNRI users. Also, the bone mineral densities were compared between patients using duloxetine and venlafaxine with healthy controls, showing similar T-score and Z-score values with no significant differences compared to the control group. However, while the lumbar region T-scores of those using duloxetine were within normal values, they were within the osteopenia range of venlafaxine and healthy controls.</div><div><em>Conclusion:</em> SNRIs may have a lower risk of developing osteoporosis than SSRIs. Of the SNRIs, duloxetine appears to be safer than venlafaxine. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine whether SNRI use is risky.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}