Optimal kidney-tonifying traditional chinese medicines for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM

Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2025.101581

Xin'e Zhong , Liyun Li , Weiliang Wan

{"title":"Optimal kidney-tonifying traditional chinese medicines for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Xin'e Zhong , Liyun Li , Weiliang Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2025.101581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Objective:</em> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different kidney-tonifying Chinese medicines (KTCMs) combined with bisphosphonates (BPs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) patients.</div><div><em>Methods:</em> This study included 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,360 PMOP patients to compare the efficacy and safety of various KTCMs combined with BPs. A systematic search was conducted in eight medical databases (CNKI, PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, Wanfang, VIP, and TCM Online). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participants were postmenopausal women with PMOP; (2) the intervention involved different KTCMs combined with BPs; (3) outcome measures included pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck BMD, serum osteocalcin levels, and the incidence of adverse events. A network meta-analysis was performed to integrate data, calculating mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). SUCRA values were used to rank treatment efficacy and assess the relative advantages of different regimens. League tables were used to visually present direct and indirect comparisons of treatments, while funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.</div><div><em>Results:</em> GSK + BPs and JWEX + BPs were the most effective in pain relief, while GSK + BPs showed the best efficacy in improving lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD. LWDH + BPs demonstrated superior performance in promoting bone metabolism. Safety analysis indicated a low incidence of adverse events, with no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div><div><em>Conclusion:</em> This study suggests that GSK + BPs and JWEX + BPs are the most effective combinations for pain relief and BMD improvement, while LWDH + BPs and GSK + BPs have advantages in promoting bone metabolism. The combination of KTCMs with BPs can effectively improve PMOP with high safety, offering significant clinical value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"28 2","pages":"Article 101581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695025000216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different kidney-tonifying Chinese medicines (KTCMs) combined with bisphosphonates (BPs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) patients.

Methods: This study included 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,360 PMOP patients to compare the efficacy and safety of various KTCMs combined with BPs. A systematic search was conducted in eight medical databases (CNKI, PUBMED, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, Wanfang, VIP, and TCM Online). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participants were postmenopausal women with PMOP; (2) the intervention involved different KTCMs combined with BPs; (3) outcome measures included pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck BMD, serum osteocalcin levels, and the incidence of adverse events. A network meta-analysis was performed to integrate data, calculating mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). SUCRA values were used to rank treatment efficacy and assess the relative advantages of different regimens. League tables were used to visually present direct and indirect comparisons of treatments, while funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

Results: GSK + BPs and JWEX + BPs were the most effective in pain relief, while GSK + BPs showed the best efficacy in improving lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD. LWDH + BPs demonstrated superior performance in promoting bone metabolism. Safety analysis indicated a low incidence of adverse events, with no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study suggests that GSK + BPs and JWEX + BPs are the most effective combinations for pain relief and BMD improvement, while LWDH + BPs and GSK + BPs have advantages in promoting bone metabolism. The combination of KTCMs with BPs can effectively improve PMOP with high safety, offering significant clinical value.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

8.00%

发文量

审稿时长

90 days

期刊介绍： The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.