{"title":"From information systems resources to effective use: Moderating effect of network embeddedness","authors":"He Li , Sungjin Yoo","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101735","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101735","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research examines how organizations can achieve effective information systems (IS) use by aligning internal IS resources with embeddedness in the IS outsourcing network. Leveraging the empirical opportunity of large-scale organization-wide meaningful use attestation of electronic health records, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of US hospitals from 2013 to 2017. We found that an organization’s network embeddedness amplifies the positive relationship between IS resources and effective IS use. We also identify different impacts depending on network embeddedness types and organization sizes. We found positive moderating effects of structural and positional embeddedness. However, junctional embeddedness has no direct or moderating effect on IS use. In addition, the moderating effects manifest differently for different-sized organizations – i.e., structural embeddedness has a stronger positive moderating effect for large organizations, while positional embeddedness’ positive moderating effect is stronger for small organizations. We also found heterogeneous direct effects of structural and positional embeddedness on organizational IS<span> use. Solely depending on structural embeddedness will result in lower IS use, which is more prominent for small organizations. Positional embeddedness has a negative direct effect on small organizations’ IS use but positively relates to large organizations’ IS use. This research highlights the role of network embeddedness in facilitating IS use and offers a nuanced understanding of its impacts. Our findings also provide practical implications for organizational IS use through strategic IS outsourcing.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 101735"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91734223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Geoffrey Mann , Stan Karanasios , Christoph F. Breidbach
{"title":"Orchestrating the digital transformation of a business ecosystem","authors":"Geoffrey Mann , Stan Karanasios , Christoph F. Breidbach","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101733","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nature, scope, and impact of digital transformation reaches well beyond the boundaries of a single firm. This suggests information systems research should consider how digital transformation unfolds within business ecosystems that consist of multiple interdependent firms, and how this process can ideally be managed. We pursue this research opportunity by introducing orchestration as a concept through which to view digital transformation in business ecosystems, and by presenting empirical insights from a longitudinal in-depth case study that highlights how a focal firm became the orchestrator of digital transformation in its business ecosystem. We explain that becoming an orchestrator of digital transformation occurs through three distinct phases: initiating, opening-up, and integrating. We also identify the interplay of activities by which a focal firm strategizes, mobilizes, and aligns other actors and their resources, as it orchestrates the digital transformation of its business ecosystem. We conclude by outlining how our work serves as an important foundation for future information systems research and offer managerial guidelines outlining how to orchestrate digital transformation processes within business ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 101733"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91692827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A taxonomy of scaling agility","authors":"Everist Limaj, Edward W.N. Bernroider","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101721","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driven by environmental uncertainty, many organizations today attempt to achieve agility at scale. However, given the variety and complexity of these efforts, there is currently a limited understanding in terms of their most relevant configurations, especially over the process of change. Based on an iterative taxonomy development approach grounded in design science, we present a taxonomy to structure, configure, and update scaling agility. The resulting multi-dimensional classification system offers an integrative view on elements only selectively considered in prior research. While offering a conceptual anchor for further research, we also provide specific configurations covering three different stages of scaling agility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 101721"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868722000178/pdfft?md5=a2c6ac884db43f865b3ce0f9df6023f9&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868722000178-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91693060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arisa Shollo , Konstantin Hopf , Tiemo Thiess , Oliver Müller
{"title":"Shifting ML value creation mechanisms: A process model of ML value creation","authors":"Arisa Shollo , Konstantin Hopf , Tiemo Thiess , Oliver Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101734","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101734","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are rapidly changing the competitive landscape. In the search for an appropriate strategic response, firms are currently engaging in a large variety of AI projects. However, recent studies suggest that many companies are falling short in creating tangible business value through AI. As the current scientific body of knowledge lacks empirically-grounded research studies for explaining this phenomenon, we conducted an exploratory interview study focusing on 56 applications of machine learning (ML) in 29 different companies. Through an inductive qualitative analysis, we uncover three broad types and five subtypes of ML value creation mechanisms, identify necessary but not sufficient conditions for successfully leveraging them, and observe that organizations, in their efforts to create value, dynamically shift from one ML value creation mechanism to another by reconfiguring their ML applications (i.e., the shifting practice). We synthesize these findings into a process model of ML value creation, which illustrates how organizations engage in (resource) orchestration by shifting between ML value creation mechanisms as their capabilities evolve and business conditions change. Our model provides an alternative explanation for the current high failure rate of ML projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 101734"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868722000300/pdfft?md5=bd72cef6b3375ba176941dedf1e1628f&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868722000300-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91692828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Immersive virtual reality in the age of the Metaverse: A hybrid-narrative review based on the technology affordance perspective","authors":"Ersin Dincelli , Alper Yayla","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Immersive virtual reality (VR) that utilizes head-mounted displays (HMD) is one of the key emerging technologies of the 21st century and has drawn keen attention from consumers, practitioners, and scholars in various disciplines. Nevertheless, the information systems (IS) discipline has neglected immersive VR, given that only a handful of studies have been published in mainstream IS journals. However, the recent advancements in immersive VR technology provide new opportunities for organizations and IS researchers. In light of these points, we reviewed the immersive VR literature to provide a holistic view of opportunities and challenges for organizations and future research directions for the IS field. By examining the technical capabilities of immersive VR and the previous literature, we identified five affordances: </span><em>embodiment</em>, <em>interactivity</em>, <em>navigability</em>, <em>sense-ability</em>, and <em>create-ability</em>. Our review of the 151 studies from the IS and related fields synthesized how these affordances were utilized in various research domains. Guided by the affordance-actualization theory, we also identified the strategic opportunities and challenges that come with implementing VR. The actualization of immersive VR affordances in organizations is indeed a fruitful area for IS scholars as there are various venues to move the IS field as well as the VR research in the organizational context forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101717"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127913497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The JSIS annual review issue: A case of swift institutionalization","authors":"Suzanne Rivard","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101722","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101722","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101722"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130647691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Information Technology–Supported value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction via social interaction and resource integration in service systems","authors":"Mengcheng Li, Tuure Tuunanen","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101719","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101719","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper develops a conceptual framework to study the constructs of information technology (IT)-supported value co-creation and co-destruction through shared processes of social interaction and resource integration as mediated by IT and embedded in interactive value formation practices. In particular, the elements of social interaction and resource integration are identified, and the role of IT is discussed. We conduct a systematic literature review and analyze the data using the service system perspective. Our research contributes by identifying the constructs of value-creating phenomena enabled by IT from the service system perspective and presenting a research agenda for further studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101719"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868722000154/pdfft?md5=3d1bf2e6055565db63c476792b0c1c69&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868722000154-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125555460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Welcome to this 2nd issue of Volume 31 of The Journal of Strategic Information Systems","authors":"Guy G. Gable, Yolande E. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101723","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101723"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138276435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Josh Morton , Alireza Amrollahi , Alexander D. Wilson
{"title":"Digital strategizing: An assessing review, definition, and research agenda","authors":"Josh Morton , Alireza Amrollahi , Alexander D. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101720","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101720","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides an assessing review and agenda for research at the ‘nexus’ between information systems and strategy practice. The review aims to understand the nature of this connection between the two areas, where information systems scholars strive to understand the everyday work of practitioners in organisations and the impact of digital technologies in strategizing, whilst strategy practice scholars seek a greater understanding of such technologies and their use by strategists. Despite a developing body of work relevant to both information systems and strategy practice, and several editorials calling for ‘synergy’, we still collectively know little about the state of knowledge at the nexus. To address this, our review identifies several constructs that provide linkages between information systems and strategy practice to reveal more about the current state of knowledge and to develop a formal definition for a domain which we call <em>digital strategizing</em>. We conclude by outlining an agenda to encourage and accelerate future research on digital strategizing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101720"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868722000166/pdfft?md5=a7ea18d4a4258af59e41af49453a0753&pid=1-s2.0-S0963868722000166-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116148905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marfri-Jay Gambal , Aleksandre Asatiani , Julia Kotlarsky
{"title":"Strategic innovation through outsourcing – A theoretical review","authors":"Marfri-Jay Gambal , Aleksandre Asatiani , Julia Kotlarsky","doi":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101718","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101718","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Competition in the Information Technology Outsourcing (ITO) and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) industry is increasingly moving from being motivated by cost savings towards strategic benefits that service providers can offer to their clients. Innovation is one such benefit that is expected nowadays in outsourcing engagements. The rising importance of innovation has been noticed and acknowledged not only in the Information Systems (IS) literature, but also in other management streams such as innovation and strategy. However, to date, these individual strands of research remain largely isolated from each other. Our theoretical review addresses this gap by consolidating and analyzing research on strategic innovation in the ITO and BPO context. The article set includes 95 papers published between 1998 and 2020 in outlets from the IS and related management fields. We craft a four-phase framework that integrates prior insights about (1) the antecedents of the decision to pursue strategic innovation in outsourcing settings; (2) arrangement options that facilitate strategic innovation in outsourcing relationships; (3) the generation of strategic innovations; and (4) realized strategic innovation outcomes, as assessed in the literature. We find that the research landscape to date is skewed, with many studies focusing on the first two phases. The last two phases remain relatively uncharted. We also discuss how innovation-oriented outsourcing insights compare with established research on cost-oriented outsourcing engagements. Finally, we offer directions for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategic Information Systems","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 101718"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116613706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}