{"title":"Hume and the rotting turnip","authors":"Michael Jacovides","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 98-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Standing out or looking for cover? Strategies for defending public funding for the social sciences in the U.S.","authors":"Emily Hauptmann","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144920179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What are consumer sentiment indicators a measure of?","authors":"Matti Sarkia","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper discusses the status of consumer sentiment indicators in macroeconomic forecasting, and argues that economists have been ambivalent between several different interpretations of the cognitive ontology of consumer sentiment: deflationism (motivated by an emphasis on economic fundamentals or rational expectations), doxastic realism (motivated by the ideas of privileged epistemic access and wisdom of the masses), and affective realism (motivated by the idea of animal spirits and willingness to spend as causal forces for the economy). These different psychological interpretations of consumer sentiment are argued to have implications for economic policy and macroeconomic forecasting owing to their contrasting assumptions about the mechanisms by which consumers acquire their views about the economy, and the ways in which their attitudes influence private consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144922070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Explaining with simulation models","authors":"Matthias Ackermann","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Computer simulations are commonly employed when researchers work with analytically intractable or practically unsolvable mathematical modeling equations. In such cases, scientists seem to deal with two different but interrelated kinds of models: a mathematical model and a simulation model. This raises at least two philosophically interesting questions. First, does one or the other model figure centrally in the activity of generating an explanation in such situations? And second, what could an account of explanation involving both mathematical models and simulation models look like? I will argue that, in a large set of cases, the simulation model serves the central role in explanatory discovery. On this basis, I will then present a counterfactual account of simulation model-induced explanation. I claim that on this approach, we often find that the simulation model possesses an explanatory autonomy from its underlying mathematical models and conclude by relating this notion to extant views on the autonomous role of scientific models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144721857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measurement requires compromises: the case of economic inequality","authors":"Alessandra Basso , Anna Alexandrova","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine considerations that enter into design and evaluation of measures in social science, categorizing them into four drivers: epistemic, ethical, pragmatic, and metrological. We call them drivers to highlight their role in guiding researchers’ decisions without determining them. Through an analysis of the World Inequality Report 2022, we reveal tensions among these drivers, illustrating the complex interplay between the various demands a measure must satisfy. Our analysis highlights the need for case-by-case compromises to address these tensions, as optimizing one driver often comes at the expense of another. We explore the extent to which these compromises shape measurement practice and the principles that guide researchers in balancing them. While existing literature on measurement assumes that tensions can be resolved with good practice and use, we argue that developing a good measure requires balancing multiple demands, recognising that it might be impossible to meet all of them simultaneously.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145018905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Boas and the metaphysics of race in the biological race debate","authors":"Yotam Harel","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Franz Boas is widely regarded as a revolutionary anthropologist, maybe even the “founding grandfather” of modern anthropology. In this paper, I examine whether, besides his scientifically pioneering work in anthropology, Boas was also a pioneer with respect to the metaphysics of race. I argue that while Boas reconstructs a biological realistic (deterministic) position about race as the popular position about race he argues with, Boas’ own position about race is best understood as anti-realism. Hence, I state that Boas accepts the biological (deterministic) meaning of race but seems to hold that given this meaning, human races are not real. I thus suggest that Boas may be taken to have led an ontological turn in the metaphysics of race rather than a semantical one, holding that human races do not exist. Boas, then, seems to be a pioneer in holding that races are not real, and his novel scientific evidence regarding so-called human races enabled him to develop his anti-realist position about race. However, I also argue that in contrast to the great influence of Boas’ scientific revolutionariness, surprisingly, his ontological turn has been almost completely unnoticed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144908884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How the cambrian exploded: Contingency in the history of science and life","authors":"Max Dresow","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Few scientific terms are as colorful as the “Cambrian explosion”: the name given to the rapid increase in animal diversity and abundance between about 540 and 520 million years ago. But for all its popularity, considerable uncertainty surrounds the history of the expression. Discussions of explosive evolution date to the early twentieth century and gained in popularity during the 1940s. Still, these discussions did not emphasize— and many did not even <em>mention</em>— the Cambrian Period, instead focusing on later explosions as a means of characterizing a distinctive mode of evolutionary activity. So how did the Cambrian explosion come to overshadow all other evolutionary explosions to become “<em>the</em> Cambrian explosion”? And how have these developments shaped discussions of the nature and significance of the event? This paper examines these questions, beginning in the nineteenth century and focusing especially on the events of the twentieth century. In doing this it illuminates the contingent history of a term— and a set of ideas— that has played an outsized role in discussions of historical contingency in biology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"Pages 34-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144893014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to Wehner et al. (2023).","authors":"Kelle Dhein","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"113 ","pages":"11-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144805093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On gender genealogies","authors":"María Jesús Santesmases","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.05.010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 57-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144335822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embedded Ecology: The Partnership Flywheel for integrating local expertise","authors":"Jesse Hamilton , Jacqueline Mae Wallis","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There have been increasing calls to improve the integration of local expertise into both scientific research and evidence-based policy development, especially for urgent problems like climate change. There are both epistemic and ethical benefits of better involving local communities in these knowledge-generating processes. Here we present a community science process model for integrating the expertise of local communities, developed through field analysis of a community science endeavor in the Galápagos Islands. We call this kind of collaboration “embedded ecology.” The process of embedded ecology is modeled by what we call the Partnership Flywheel, which includes phases for ideation, planning, implementation, and learning. The importance of sustained collaboration between external practitioners and a local community cannot be overstated, which is one reason the flywheel is iterative, allowing the focus to be on sustained project generation and improvement. After discussing the practical elements of the Partnership Flywheel process model, we argue that its simplicity and replicability are essential for any process model aimed at improving the integration of local expertise in community science, thereby addressing both current and enduring challenges in the field. In sum, we present and explore a new community science process model thus advancing a recently growing literature on the theory of participatory research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 179-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144655790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}