Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad, Rasool Bux, Anjum Naqvi, Fariha Shaheen, Rafey Ali, Sajid Muhammad, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
{"title":"An innovative Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation for child health in rural Pakistan (CoMIC): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.","authors":"Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad, Rasool Bux, Anjum Naqvi, Fariha Shaheen, Rafey Ali, Sajid Muhammad, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any ","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e121-e133"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karen du Preez, Helen E Jenkins, Leonardo Martinez, Silvia S Chiang, Sicelo S Dlamini, Mariia Dolynska, Andrii Aleksandrin, Julia Kobe, Stephen M Graham, Anneke C Hesseling, Jeffrey R Starke, James A Seddon, Peter J Dodd
{"title":"Global burden of tuberculous meningitis in children aged 0-14 years in 2019: a mathematical modelling study.","authors":"Karen du Preez, Helen E Jenkins, Leonardo Martinez, Silvia S Chiang, Sicelo S Dlamini, Mariia Dolynska, Andrii Aleksandrin, Julia Kobe, Stephen M Graham, Anneke C Hesseling, Jeffrey R Starke, James A Seddon, Peter J Dodd","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00383-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00383-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculous meningitis is fatal if untreated and can lead to lifelong neurological sequelae. However, to our knowledge, there are no data on the number of children affected by this disease. We aimed to estimate the global disease burden and attributable mortality of childhood tuberculous meningitis by WHO regions, age groups, treatment status, and HIV status in 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a Bayesian mathematical model to estimate the number of children aged 0-14 years who developed tuberculous meningitis, died from tuberculous meningitis, and did not die from tuberculous meningitis but had neurological sequelae in 2019. We reviewed the literature and used meta-analyses to quantify key parameters used as model inputs: risk of tuberculous meningitis after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, tuberculous meningitis as a proportion of tuberculosis notification data (ie, routine surveillance data that countries report to WHO), and risk ratios for tuberculous-meningitis mortality by age group. We identified routine tuberculosis surveillance data from countries and literature that reported the proportion of notified childhood tuberculosis that was due to tuberculous meningitis. Country-level data were from Brazil; the USA; Ukraine; South Africa; and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, which included 29 countries but was aggregated and considered as one site. We assumed tuberculosis notification was synonymous with detection and treatment, combined age-disaggregated risk ratios and published meta-analytic estimates of the case-fatality rate in children who received treatment to produce estimates of tuberculous-meningitis mortality by age group and HIV status, and assumed that untreated tuberculous meningitis was always fatal. We assumed similar age-disaggregated risk ratios for neurological sequelae among children who had treatment for tuberculous meningitis and lived as for children who died.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>An estimated 24 000 (95% credible interval 22 300-25 700) children younger than 15 years developed tuberculous meningitis in 2019. Of these children, 13 000 (12 100-13 900) were estimated to have been diagnosed and treated for tuberculous meningitis. Most untreated children were younger than 5 years. Among the 24 000 children with tuberculous meningitis, 16 100 (14 900-17 300) were estimated to have died in 2019, of whom 1101 (6·8%) had HIV. 13 380 (83·1%) of 16 100 deaths were estimated to be in children younger than 5 years and 11 000 (68·3%) were estimated to be in children who did not receive tuberculous-meningitis treatment. Of the 7900 (5800-10 000) children who did not die, 5550 (5110-5980) were estimated to have neurological sequelae.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our estimates of tuberculous meningitis in children younger than 15 years showed substantial mortality and morbidity. Improved diagnostics and strong health-care systems to facilit","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e59-e68"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adanna Ewuzie, Lauren Wilburn, Dixa B Thakrar, Huike Cheng, Fabian Reitzug, Nia Roberts, Reem Malouf, Goylette F Chami
{"title":"Association of current Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum, and Schistosoma mekongi infection status and intensity with periportal fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Adanna Ewuzie, Lauren Wilburn, Dixa B Thakrar, Huike Cheng, Fabian Reitzug, Nia Roberts, Reem Malouf, Goylette F Chami","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00425-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00425-X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periportal fibrosis is a severe morbidity caused by both current and past exposure to intestinal schistosomes. We aimed to assess the association between current infection status and intensity of Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum, or Schistosoma mekongi with periportal fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, and MEDLINE from database inception to June 18, 2024. We applied methodological filters to limit our search to randomised controlled trials or observational studies, including before-and-after study designs. Animal studies were excluded, and no date or language limits were applied. We excluded reviews, editorials, personal opinions, and case reports. Self-reported infection status was an ineligible exposure. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full-text reports for eligibility. A third reviewer was consulted in cases of disagreement. The outcome of periportal fibrosis was recorded as reported by study authors to investigate variation in liver fibrosis definitions. For the key exposure of current infection, data were extracted for Schistosoma species, diagnostics, and author-provided infection status and intensity definitions. A meta-analysis was conducted for current schistosome infection status and intensity against author-defined current periportal fibrosis. Pooled effect sizes were derived using inverse-variance weighted random effects. Subgroup analyses included study characteristics and quality. The modified National Institute of Health risk of bias tool was used for assessing study quality. The protocol adhered to PRISMA reporting standards and was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022333919.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our electronic search retrieved 2853 records, of which 1036 were duplicates. Nine records were identified in bibliographies of eligible full-text reports. We screened 1826 titles and abstracts to find 282 articles that met our inclusion criteria for full-text review. 41 studies were eligible for systematic review, 33 studies were eligible for infection status meta-analysis, and seven studies were eligible for infection intensity meta-analysis. Periportal fibrosis was heterogeneously defined with the Niamey ultrasound protocol most used. When findings were pooled, current schistosome infection status was associated with a higher likelihood of periportal fibrosis compared with no current infection (odds ratio [OR] 2·65, 95% CI 1·79-3·92; p<0·0001). Heterogeneity was high (I<sup>2</sup>=95·81%). In sub-Saharan Africa, before the widespread introduction of mass drug administration in 2003 there was a significant association between current infection status and periportal fibrosis (OR 5·38, 95% CI 2·03-14·25) but this association was no longer present after 2003 (1·19, 0·82-1·74). No association of curre","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e69-e80"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lancet Global HealthPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00413-3
Timothy B Hallett, Tara D Mangal, Asif U Tamuri, Nimalan Arinaminpathy, Valentina Cambiano, Martin Chalkley, Joseph H Collins, Jonathan Cooper, Matthew S Gillman, Mosè Giordano, Matthew M Graham, William Graham, Iwona Hawryluk, Eva Janoušková, Britta L Jewell, Ines Li Lin, Robert Manning Smith, Gerald Manthalu, Emmanuel Mnjowe, Sakshi Mohan, Margherita Molaro, Wingston Ng'ambi, Dominic Nkhoma, Stefan Piatek, Paul Revill, Alison Rodger, Dimitra Salmanidou, Bingling She, Mikaela Smit, Pakwanja D Twea, Tim Colbourn, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Andrew N Phillips
{"title":"Estimates of resource use in the public-sector health-care system and the effect of strengthening health-care services in Malawi during 2015-19: a modelling study (Thanzi La Onse).","authors":"Timothy B Hallett, Tara D Mangal, Asif U Tamuri, Nimalan Arinaminpathy, Valentina Cambiano, Martin Chalkley, Joseph H Collins, Jonathan Cooper, Matthew S Gillman, Mosè Giordano, Matthew M Graham, William Graham, Iwona Hawryluk, Eva Janoušková, Britta L Jewell, Ines Li Lin, Robert Manning Smith, Gerald Manthalu, Emmanuel Mnjowe, Sakshi Mohan, Margherita Molaro, Wingston Ng'ambi, Dominic Nkhoma, Stefan Piatek, Paul Revill, Alison Rodger, Dimitra Salmanidou, Bingling She, Mikaela Smit, Pakwanja D Twea, Tim Colbourn, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Andrew N Phillips","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00413-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00413-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In all health-care systems, decisions need to be made regarding allocation of available resources. Evidence is needed for these decisions, especially in low-income countries. We aimed to estimate how health-care resources provided by the public sector were used in Malawi during 2015-19 and to estimate the effects of strengthening health-care services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this modelling study, we used the Thanzi La Onse model, an individual-based simulation model. The scope of the model was health care provided by the public sector in Malawi during 2015-19. Health-care services were delivered during health-care system interaction (HSI) events, which we characterised as occurring at a particular facility level and requiring a particular number of appointments. We developed mechanistic models for the causes of death and disability that were estimated to account for approximately 81% of deaths and approximately 72% of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in Malawi during 2015-19, according to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) estimates; we computed DALYs incurred in the population as the sum of years of life lost and years lived with disability. The disease models could interact with one another and with the underlying properties of each person. Each person in the Thanzi La Onse model had specific properties (eg, sex, district of residence, wealth percentile, smoking status, and BMI, among others), for which we measured distribution and evolution over time using demographic and health survey data. We also estimated the effect of different types of health-care system improvement.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We estimated that the public-sector health-care system in Malawi averted 41·2 million DALYs (95% UI 38·6-43·8) during 2015-19, approximately half of the 84·3 million DALYs (81·5-86·9) that the population would otherwise have incurred. DALYs averted were heavily skewed to children aged 0-4 years due to services averting DALYs that would be caused by acute lower respiratory tract infection, HIV or AIDS, malaria, or neonatal disorders. DALYs averted among adults were mostly attributed to HIV or AIDS and tuberculosis. Under a scenario whereby each appointment took the time expected and health-care workers did not work for longer than contracted, the health-care system in Malawi during 2015-19 would have averted only 19·1 million DALYs (95% UI 17·1-22·4), suggesting that approximately 21·3 million DALYS (20·0-23·6) of total effect were derived through overwork of health-care workers. If people becoming ill immediately accessed care, all referrals were successfully completed, diagnostic accuracy of health-care workers was as good as possible, and consumables (ie, medicines) were always available, 28·2% (95% UI 25·7-30·9) more DALYS (ie, 12·2 million DALYs [95% UI 10·9-13·8]) could be averted.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The health-care system in Malawi provides substantial health gains wi","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"e28-e37"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Margit Endler, Unnop Jaisamrarn, Suneeta Mittal, Phutrakool Phanupong, Du Van Du, Toan Anh Ngo, Hans Vemer, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
{"title":"Effectiveness and acceptability of a 24-h interval versus a 48-h interval between mifepristone intake and misoprostol administration for in-hospital abortion at 9-20 gestational weeks: an international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Margit Endler, Unnop Jaisamrarn, Suneeta Mittal, Phutrakool Phanupong, Du Van Du, Toan Anh Ngo, Hans Vemer, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00416-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00416-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimising management of second-trimester medical abortion is important, as complications increase with gestational age. We aimed to compare a 24-h interval with a 48-h interval between mifepristone intake and misoprostol administration in in-hospital, second-trimester medical abortion for effectiveness and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted at nine hospitals in India, Sweden, Thailand, and Viet Nam among adults undergoing medical abortion for a singleton viable pregnancy at a gestation of between 9 weeks and 20 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via central computer-generated sequence stratified by study site to receive 200 mg mifepristone orally and (after being admitted to hospital) 800 μg misoprostol vaginally either 24 h (the intervention) or 48 h (the control) later followed by 400 μg misoprostol sublingually every 3 h. If no abortion occurred after five doses, the 200 mg mifepristone was repeated, followed by the same misoprostol regimen the following day. The participants, researchers, and clinic staff were not masked to the allocation group. The primary outcome was complete fetal expulsion (herein defined as successful abortion) within 12 h of the initial misoprostol dose. The non-inferiority margin was set at 5%. Outcomes were compared in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, from which randomly assigned participants who discontinued before receiving mifepristone or misoprostol were excluded. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN49711891, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Feb 18, 2015, and Oct 15, 2016, we screened 724 individuals and 540 participants were enrolled in the study (271 in the 24-h interval group and 269 in the 48-h interval group). Nine participants were excluded from analysis because they did not return for either mifepristone intake or misoprostol administration. The mITT population therefore consisted of 531 participants, of whom 266 were allocated to the 24-h interval group and 265 to the 48-h interval group. By mITT, the succsessful abortion rate within 12 h was 89% (236 of 266 participants) in the 24-h interval group and 94% (248 of 265 participants) in the 48-h interval group (odds ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·29-1·00). The risk difference was -4·86% (95% CI -0·05 to -9·67), which exceeded our non-inferiority margin of 5%. One participant in the 24-h interval group died following an otherwise uncomplicated abortion from what was assessed as being an amniotic fluid embolism unrelated to their participation in the trial. The most common adverse events in both groups were heavy bleeding, shivering, fever, and nausea.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>A 24-h interval between mifepristone intake and misoprostol administration has a lower rate of successful abortion within 12 h than a 48-h interva","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e112-e120"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lancet Global HealthPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00373-5
Chido Dziva Chikwari, Ethel Dauya, Victoria Simms, Katharina Kranzer, Tsitsi Bandason, Anna Machiha, Owen Mugurungi, Primrose Musiyandaka, Tinashe Mwaturura, Nkazimulo Tshuma, Sarah Bernays, Constancia Mavodza, Mandikudza Tembo, Kevin Martin, Constance R S Mackworth-Young, Joanna Busza, Suzanna C Francis, Richard J Hayes, Rashida A Ferrand
{"title":"Effect of a community-based intervention for sexually transmitted infections on population-level prevalence among youth in Zimbabwe (STICH): a cluster-randomised trial.","authors":"Chido Dziva Chikwari, Ethel Dauya, Victoria Simms, Katharina Kranzer, Tsitsi Bandason, Anna Machiha, Owen Mugurungi, Primrose Musiyandaka, Tinashe Mwaturura, Nkazimulo Tshuma, Sarah Bernays, Constancia Mavodza, Mandikudza Tembo, Kevin Martin, Constance R S Mackworth-Young, Joanna Busza, Suzanna C Francis, Richard J Hayes, Rashida A Ferrand","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00373-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00373-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young people are at particularly high risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We conducted a trial to investigate the effect of a community-based intervention that included STI screening among youth on population-level prevalence of STIs in Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STICH was a parallel-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial nested within CHIEDZA, a trial of community-based integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for youth in Zimbabwe. STICH was conducted in Harare and Bulawayo provinces with eight clusters in each province, randomised 1:1 to control (existing health services) or to the intervention: community-based screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (males and females) and Trichomonas vaginalis (females only) offered over 12 months to intervention cluster residents aged 16-24 years who were attending CHIEDZA. Outcomes were ascertained through a population-level survey immediately after the intervention period, which included young people aged 18-24 years who lived in randomly selected households in each of the 16 clusters. The primary outcome was population prevalence of any (one or more) of the three STIs; secondary outcomes were prevalence of each of the three STIs. The STICH trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN15013425, and the CHIEDZA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03719521.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From Oct 6, 2021, to March 8, 2022, 6361 randomly sampled young people were recruited into the outcome survey (median age 20 years [IQR 19-22], 3500 female and 2101 male, 3066 in intervention clusters and 3295 in control clusters). 5601 participants were included in the primary outcome analysis (2756 in intervention clusters and 2845 in control clusters). In the intervention clusters, 612 (22·2%) of 2756 participants reported that they had attended CHIEDZA and 298 (10·8%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the control clusters, 113 (4·0%) of 2845 participants had attended CHIEDZA and 40 (1·4%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the outcome survey, the cluster-level geometric mean prevalence of the primary outcome (any of C trachomatis, N gonorrhoeae, and T vaginalis) was 19·07% (geometric standard deviation [GSD] 1·20) in the intervention arm versus 19·95% (GSD 1·10) in the control arm (risk ratio [RR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·78-1·10]; p=0·35). There was no difference between arms in geometric mean prevalence of C trachomatis (12·86% [GSD 1·14] in the intervention arm vs 12·94% [GSD 1·15] in the control arm, RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·84-1·11]; p=0·60) or T vaginalis (7·06% [GSD 1·48] vs 6·20% [1·38], RR 1·09 [95% CI 0·74-1·60]; p=0·66). N gonorrhoeae prevalence was significantly lower in the intervention arm, with a 43% risk reduction (geometric mean 1·65% [GSD 1·77] vs 2·87% [1·43], RR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·96]; p=0·036).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"e134-e145"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lancet Global HealthPub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00470-4
Tsion Firew, Louise Mwiseneza, Malaika Asabwe, Ineza Nadine Vanessa, Marie Henriette Uwintwari, Françoise Nizeyimana, Doris Lorette Uwamahoro
{"title":"Women at the front line of the Marburg virus disease response in Rwanda: balancing clinical care, public health, and family life.","authors":"Tsion Firew, Louise Mwiseneza, Malaika Asabwe, Ineza Nadine Vanessa, Marie Henriette Uwintwari, Françoise Nizeyimana, Doris Lorette Uwamahoro","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00470-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00470-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"e21-e22"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eve Nakabembe, Melanie Greenland, Kyle Amaral, Bahaa Abu-Raya, Alexander Amone, Nick Andrews, Liberty Cantrell, Elodie Lesne, Andrew Gorringe, Rachel Halkerston, Nikki Mcstraw, Louisa Dixon, Olivia F Hunter, Paul T Heath, Esther Imede, Mary Kyohere, Philippa Musoke, Annettee Nakimuli, Musa Sekikubo, Stephen Taylor, Valerie Tusubira, Manish Sadarangani, Kirsty Le Doare
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of an acellular pertussis vaccine containing genetically detoxified pertussis toxin administered to pregnant women living with and without HIV and their newborns (WoMANPOWER): a randomised controlled trial in Uganda.","authors":"Eve Nakabembe, Melanie Greenland, Kyle Amaral, Bahaa Abu-Raya, Alexander Amone, Nick Andrews, Liberty Cantrell, Elodie Lesne, Andrew Gorringe, Rachel Halkerston, Nikki Mcstraw, Louisa Dixon, Olivia F Hunter, Paul T Heath, Esther Imede, Mary Kyohere, Philippa Musoke, Annettee Nakimuli, Musa Sekikubo, Stephen Taylor, Valerie Tusubira, Manish Sadarangani, Kirsty Le Doare","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00409-1","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00409-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunisation in pregnancy against pertussis can reduce severe disease in infancy. There are few data on the safety and immunogenicity of vaccines given to pregnant women living with HIV and their infants. We aimed to describe the safety and immunogenicity of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine containing genetically detoxified pertussis toxin given to pregnant women living with HIV and the effect of the vaccine on infant whole-cell pertussis vaccine responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observer-blind, randomised, phase 2, multicentre, non-inferiority trial evaluating safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine containing genetically detoxified acellular pertussis in pregnant women living with HIV in Uganda. Women aged at least 18 years between 16 weeks and 26 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to receive the tetanus-diphtheria (Td) vaccine or TdaP vaccine. Stratified block randomisation using blocks of four with a 1:1:1:1 ratio stratified by participant HIV status was used to distribute participants into equal groups (50 participants per group for a total of 200 participants). The intervention was a 0·5 mL single intramuscular dose of TdaP vaccine. Td or TdaP vaccination was randomly assigned to different clinic days using randomisation software. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were anti-pertussis toxin and anti-filamentous haemagglutinin IgG concentrations in infants at delivery and 18 weeks following three doses of a whole-cell pertussis containing vaccine. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04589312.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 28, 2020, and May 21, 2021, 438 pregnant women were screened and 181 were randomly assigned: 90 to TdaP vaccine (40 HIV-positive participants and 50 HIV-negative participants) and 91 to Td vaccine (41 HIV-positive participants and 50 HIV-negative participants). All participants received Td, and 4 weeks later, 177 received either Td or TdaP. 32 serious adverse events occurred, none related to the study vaccine. At delivery, anti-pertussis toxin IgG concentrations for TdaP versus Td were superior in infants who were HIV-exposed but uninfected (geometric mean ratio 9·61, 95% CI 5·21-17·74) and HIV-unexposed infants (21·6, 11·2-41·7). In infants at 18 weeks, anti-pertussis toxin IgG concentrations for TdaP versus Td-vaccinated mothers were significantly lower for both infants who were HIV-exposed but uninfected (0·19, 0·09-0·43) and infants who were not HIV-exposed (0·17, 0·08-0·33). Serum bactericidal antibody generation following whole-cell pertussis vaccination in infants was not affected.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>TdaP was safe and immunogenic in pregnant women living with HIV and their infants. TdaP provided superior anti-pertussis toxin IgG concentrations at delivery. Following routine vaccination with whole-cell pertussis vaccine, infants born to women receiving the TdaP vaccine had lower anti-pe","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e81-e97"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659843/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Essential shifts in health workforce measurement: a human-centred approach.","authors":"Pooja Yerramilli, Kathryn Andrews, Jigyasa Sharma, Mickey Chopra","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00422-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00422-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health sector has faced long-standing challenges in drivers of worker behaviours and performance, such as job satisfaction, which have been worsened by COVID-19. Structural issues including high workloads and poor working conditions have long contributed to dissatisfaction among health workers. The pandemic escalated unsafe working conditions, causing workers' deaths, increasing burnout rates, and contributing to exodus from health-care jobs. To begin to address these challenges, systematising a human-centred approach to health workforce measurement, which emphasises the drivers of worker behaviour, is crucial. This approach requires a critical re-examination of historical metrics including those on absenteeism, caseload, and competence, which primarily characterise health workers as inputs into the health system. Transition should be made towards more human-centred measures of absence, workload, competency, and job satisfaction. The revision of the World Bank's Service Delivery Indicators health survey, a large-scale facility-based survey that provides within-country and cross-country information on health systems quality, showcases how revisiting widely used metrics through a human-centred lens is needed to yield more fit-for-purpose policy insights that identify health worker wellbeing as key to achieving global health goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e167-e171"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Harm reduction must replace punitive drug policies","authors":"The Lancet Global Health","doi":"10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00525-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00525-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":34.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142790067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}