Effects of international sanctions on age-specific mortality: a cross-national panel data analysis.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón, Mark Weisbrot
{"title":"Effects of international sanctions on age-specific mortality: a cross-national panel data analysis.","authors":"Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón, Mark Weisbrot","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00189-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has shown a correlation between the imposition of sanctions and worsening health conditions in target countries. However, the direction of causality in this relationship remains unclear. No study has yet examined the effects of sanctions on age-specific mortality rates in cross-country panel data using methods designed to address causal identification in observational data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-national panel data analysis, we analysed the effect on health of sanctions using a panel dataset of age-specific mortality rates and sanctions episodes for 152 countries between 1971 and 2021. We apply a range of methods designed to address causal questions using observational data, including entropy balancing, Granger causality, event-study representations, and instrumental variables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our findings showed a significant causal association between sanctions and increased mortality. We found the strongest effects for unilateral, economic, and US sanctions, whereas we found no statistical evidence of an effect for UN sanctions. Mortality effects ranged from 8·4 log points (95% CI 3·9-13·0) for children younger than 5 years to 2·4 log points (0·9-4·0) for individuals aged 60-80 years. We estimated that unilateral sanctions were associated with an annual toll of 564 258 deaths (95% CI 367 838-760 677), similar to the global mortality burden associated with armed conflict.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Sanctions have substantial adverse effects on public health, with a death toll similar to that of wars. Our findings underscore the need to rethink sanctions as a foreign-policy tool, highlighting the importance of exercising restraint in their use and seriously considering efforts to reform their design.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Center for Economic and Policy Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 8","pages":"e1358-e1366"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00189-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has shown a correlation between the imposition of sanctions and worsening health conditions in target countries. However, the direction of causality in this relationship remains unclear. No study has yet examined the effects of sanctions on age-specific mortality rates in cross-country panel data using methods designed to address causal identification in observational data.

Methods: In this cross-national panel data analysis, we analysed the effect on health of sanctions using a panel dataset of age-specific mortality rates and sanctions episodes for 152 countries between 1971 and 2021. We apply a range of methods designed to address causal questions using observational data, including entropy balancing, Granger causality, event-study representations, and instrumental variables.

Findings: Our findings showed a significant causal association between sanctions and increased mortality. We found the strongest effects for unilateral, economic, and US sanctions, whereas we found no statistical evidence of an effect for UN sanctions. Mortality effects ranged from 8·4 log points (95% CI 3·9-13·0) for children younger than 5 years to 2·4 log points (0·9-4·0) for individuals aged 60-80 years. We estimated that unilateral sanctions were associated with an annual toll of 564 258 deaths (95% CI 367 838-760 677), similar to the global mortality burden associated with armed conflict.

Interpretation: Sanctions have substantial adverse effects on public health, with a death toll similar to that of wars. Our findings underscore the need to rethink sanctions as a foreign-policy tool, highlighting the importance of exercising restraint in their use and seriously considering efforts to reform their design.

Funding: The Center for Economic and Policy Research.

国际制裁对特定年龄死亡率的影响:一个跨国小组数据分析。
背景:以往的研究表明,实施制裁与目标国家健康状况恶化之间存在相关性。然而,这种关系的因果关系方向仍不清楚。目前还没有研究使用旨在确定观察数据因果关系的方法检查制裁对跨国小组数据中特定年龄死亡率的影响。方法:在这项跨国小组数据分析中,我们使用1971年至2021年间152个国家的特定年龄死亡率和制裁事件的小组数据集分析了制裁对健康的影响。我们应用了一系列的方法来解决使用观测数据的因果问题,包括熵平衡、格兰杰因果关系、事件研究表征和工具变量。研究结果:我们的研究结果显示制裁与死亡率增加之间存在显著的因果关系。我们发现单边制裁、经济制裁和美国制裁的影响最大,而我们没有发现统计证据表明联合国制裁有影响。5岁以下儿童的死亡率影响范围为8.4个对数点(95% CI 3.9 - 13.0), 60-80岁个体的死亡率影响范围为2.4个对数点(0.9 - 4.0)。我们估计,单边制裁与每年564 258人死亡(95%可信区间为367 838-760 677)有关,与与武装冲突有关的全球死亡负担相似。解读:制裁对公众健康产生重大不利影响,死亡人数与战争相当。我们的调查结果强调有必要重新考虑将制裁作为一种外交政策工具,强调在使用制裁时保持克制的重要性,并认真考虑改革其设计的努力。资助:经济与政策研究中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信