Effective refractive error coverage in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of updated estimates from population-based surveys in 76 countries modelling the path towards the 2030 global target.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00194-9
Rupert Richard Alexander Bourne, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, David A Selby, Tabassom Sedighi, Ian H Tapply, Ian McCormick, Jost B Jonas, Mohammad H Abdianwall, Mukharram M Bikbov, Tasanee Braithwaite, Matthew J Burton, Vera Carneiro, Robert J Casson, Ching-Yu Cheng, Nathan G Congdon, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Leon B Ellwein, Mohammad Hassan Emamian, Akbar Fotouhi, Timothy R Fricke, David S Friedman, João M Furtado, Ronnie George, Noopur Gupta, Xiaotong Han, Hassan Hashemi, Mingguang He, Abba Hydara, Aiko Iwase, Gyulli Kazakbaeva, Rajiv B Khandekar, Rohit C Khanna, Fatima Kyari, Luisa C Luque, Srinivas Marmamula, Andreas Müller, Vinay Nangia, Kovin S Naidoo, Jacqueline Ramke, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Solange R Salomão, Hugh R Taylor, Yih C Tham, Fotis Topouzis, Rohit Varma, Lingam Vijaya, Ningli Wang, Ya Xing Wang, Tien Y Wong, Hua Yan, Seth R Flaxman, Stuart Keel, Serge Resnikoff
{"title":"Effective refractive error coverage in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of updated estimates from population-based surveys in 76 countries modelling the path towards the 2030 global target.","authors":"Rupert Richard Alexander Bourne, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, David A Selby, Tabassom Sedighi, Ian H Tapply, Ian McCormick, Jost B Jonas, Mohammad H Abdianwall, Mukharram M Bikbov, Tasanee Braithwaite, Matthew J Burton, Vera Carneiro, Robert J Casson, Ching-Yu Cheng, Nathan G Congdon, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Leon B Ellwein, Mohammad Hassan Emamian, Akbar Fotouhi, Timothy R Fricke, David S Friedman, João M Furtado, Ronnie George, Noopur Gupta, Xiaotong Han, Hassan Hashemi, Mingguang He, Abba Hydara, Aiko Iwase, Gyulli Kazakbaeva, Rajiv B Khandekar, Rohit C Khanna, Fatima Kyari, Luisa C Luque, Srinivas Marmamula, Andreas Müller, Vinay Nangia, Kovin S Naidoo, Jacqueline Ramke, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Solange R Salomão, Hugh R Taylor, Yih C Tham, Fotis Topouzis, Rohit Varma, Lingam Vijaya, Ningli Wang, Ya Xing Wang, Tien Y Wong, Hua Yan, Seth R Flaxman, Stuart Keel, Serge Resnikoff","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00194-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2024, WHO included effective refractive error coverage (eREC) into the results framework of the 14th General Programme of Work, which sets a road map for global health and guides WHO's work between 2025 and 2028. eREC is a measure of both the availability and quality of refractive correction in a population. This study aimed to model global and regional estimates of eREC as of 2023 and evaluate progress towards the WHO global target of a 40 percentage-point absolute increase in eREC by 2030.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Vision Loss Expert Group analysed data from 237 population-based eye surveys conducted in 76 countries since 2000, comprising 815 273 participants, to calculate eREC (met need / met need + undermet need + unmet need]) and the relative quality gap between eREC and REC ([REC - eREC] / REC × 100, where REC = [met + undermet need] / [met need + undermet need + unmet need]). An expert elicitation process was used to choose covariates for a Bayesian logistic regression model used to estimate eREC by country-age-sex grouping among adults aged 50 years and older. Country-age-sex group estimates were aggregated to provide estimates according to Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) super-regions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Global eREC was estimated to be 65·8% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 64·7-66·8) in 2023, 6 percentage points higher than in 2010 (eREC 59·8% [59·4-60·2]). There were marked differences in eREC between GBD super-regions in 2023, ranging from 84·0% (95% UI 83·0-85·0) in high-income countries to 28·3% (26·4-30·4) in sub-Saharan Africa. In all super-regions, eREC was lower in females than males, and decreased with increasing age among adults aged ≥50 years. Since 2000, the relative increase in eREC was 60·2% in sub-Saharan Africa, 45·7% in North Africa and the Middle East, 41·5% in southeast Asia, east Asia and Oceania, 40·3% in south Asia, 16·2% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 8·3% in central Europe, eastern Europe and central Asia, and 6·8% in the high-income super-region. The relative quality gap ranged from 2·9% to 78·3% across studies, with larger gaps characteristically in regions of lower eREC. Globally, the percentage of those with a refractive need that was undermet reduced between 2000 and 2023, from 10·0% (95% UI 9·5-10·5) to 5·3% (5·1-5·5).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The current trajectory of improvement in eREC and the relative quality gap are insufficient to meet the 2030 target. Global efforts to equitably increase spectacle coverage, such as the WHO SPECS 2030 initiative, and to address equity failings associated with geography, age, and sex, are crucial to accelerating progress towards the 2030 targets. No region is close to achieving universal coverage.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>WHO, Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Fondation Thea, University of Heidelberg, German Federal Ministry for Education and Research.</p><p><strong>Translations: </strong>For the French, Chinese and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":" ","pages":"e1396-e1405"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00194-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2024, WHO included effective refractive error coverage (eREC) into the results framework of the 14th General Programme of Work, which sets a road map for global health and guides WHO's work between 2025 and 2028. eREC is a measure of both the availability and quality of refractive correction in a population. This study aimed to model global and regional estimates of eREC as of 2023 and evaluate progress towards the WHO global target of a 40 percentage-point absolute increase in eREC by 2030.

Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the Vision Loss Expert Group analysed data from 237 population-based eye surveys conducted in 76 countries since 2000, comprising 815 273 participants, to calculate eREC (met need / met need + undermet need + unmet need]) and the relative quality gap between eREC and REC ([REC - eREC] / REC × 100, where REC = [met + undermet need] / [met need + undermet need + unmet need]). An expert elicitation process was used to choose covariates for a Bayesian logistic regression model used to estimate eREC by country-age-sex grouping among adults aged 50 years and older. Country-age-sex group estimates were aggregated to provide estimates according to Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) super-regions.

Findings: Global eREC was estimated to be 65·8% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 64·7-66·8) in 2023, 6 percentage points higher than in 2010 (eREC 59·8% [59·4-60·2]). There were marked differences in eREC between GBD super-regions in 2023, ranging from 84·0% (95% UI 83·0-85·0) in high-income countries to 28·3% (26·4-30·4) in sub-Saharan Africa. In all super-regions, eREC was lower in females than males, and decreased with increasing age among adults aged ≥50 years. Since 2000, the relative increase in eREC was 60·2% in sub-Saharan Africa, 45·7% in North Africa and the Middle East, 41·5% in southeast Asia, east Asia and Oceania, 40·3% in south Asia, 16·2% in Latin America and the Caribbean, 8·3% in central Europe, eastern Europe and central Asia, and 6·8% in the high-income super-region. The relative quality gap ranged from 2·9% to 78·3% across studies, with larger gaps characteristically in regions of lower eREC. Globally, the percentage of those with a refractive need that was undermet reduced between 2000 and 2023, from 10·0% (95% UI 9·5-10·5) to 5·3% (5·1-5·5).

Interpretation: The current trajectory of improvement in eREC and the relative quality gap are insufficient to meet the 2030 target. Global efforts to equitably increase spectacle coverage, such as the WHO SPECS 2030 initiative, and to address equity failings associated with geography, age, and sex, are crucial to accelerating progress towards the 2030 targets. No region is close to achieving universal coverage.

Funding: WHO, Sightsavers, The Fred Hollows Foundation, Fondation Thea, University of Heidelberg, German Federal Ministry for Education and Research.

Translations: For the French, Chinese and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

成人有效屈光不正覆盖率:对76个国家基于人口的调查的最新估计进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,为实现2030年全球目标的路径建模。
背景:2024年,世卫组织将有效屈光不正覆盖率(eREC)纳入第14个工作总规划的成果框架,该规划为全球卫生制定了路线图,并指导世卫组织在2025年至2028年之间的工作。eREC是衡量人群中屈光矫正的可用性和质量的指标。本研究旨在模拟截至2023年的全球和区域eREC估计数,并评估世卫组织到2030年将eREC绝对增长40%的全球目标的进展情况。方法:在这项系统回顾和荟萃分析中,视力丧失专家组分析了自2000年以来在76个国家进行的237项基于人群的眼科调查数据,包括815273名参与者,计算eREC(满足需求/满足需求+未满足需求+未满足需求)和eREC与REC之间的相对质量差距([REC - eREC] / REC × 100,其中REC =[满足+未满足需求]/[满足需求+未满足需求+未满足需求])。采用专家启发过程为贝叶斯逻辑回归模型选择协变量,该模型用于按国家-年龄-性别分组估计50岁及以上成年人的eREC。根据全球疾病、伤害和风险因素负担研究(GBD)超级区域,汇总了国家、年龄、性别组估计数,以提供估计数。研究结果:2023年全球eREC估计为65.8%(95%不确定区间[UI] 64.7 - 66.8),比2010年(eREC 59.8%[59.4 - 60.2])高出6个百分点。2023年,GBD超级区域之间的eREC差异显著,从高收入国家的83.4% (95% UI 83.3% - 85.5%)到撒哈拉以南非洲的28.3%(26.4% - 30.4%)。在所有超级区域中,eREC的女性低于男性,并且在≥50岁的成年人中随着年龄的增加而下降。自2000年以来,撒哈拉以南非洲地区的eREC相对增长率为60.2%,北非和中东地区为45.7%,东南亚、东亚和大洋洲为41.5%,南亚为40.3%,拉丁美洲和加勒比地区为16.2%,中欧、东欧和中亚为8.3%,高收入超级地区为6.8%。各研究的相对质量差距从2.9%到72.3%不等,在eREC较低的地区,差距更大。在全球范围内,屈光需求未得到满足的比例在2000年至2023年期间从10.0% (95% UI 9.5 - 10.5)降至5.3%(5.5% - 1.5)。解读:目前,中国在生态教育方面的改善轨迹和相对质量差距不足以实现2030年的目标。公平增加景观覆盖率的全球努力,如世卫组织2030年SPECS倡议,以及解决与地理、年龄和性别相关的公平缺失,对于加速实现2030年目标至关重要。没有一个区域接近实现全民覆盖。资助:世卫组织、视力拯救者、弗雷德·霍洛斯基金会、Thea基金会、海德堡大学、德国联邦教育和研究部。翻译:关于摘要的法文、中文和西班牙文翻译,请参见补充资料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信