{"title":"Robotics and artificial intelligence in the real world of interventional radiology: Innovation or illusion?","authors":"Baptiste Bonnet , Lambros Tselikas","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":"106 5","pages":"Pages 145-146"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143123914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Myocardial scar detection in patients with implantable cardiac device: Wideband free-breathing motion-corrected black-blood late gadolinium enhancement could be the answer","authors":"Farah Cadour , Benjamin Longère","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":"106 5","pages":"Pages 143-144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francois H. Cornelis , Dimitrios K Filippiadis , Philipp Wiggermann , Stephen B. Solomon , David C. Madoff , Laurent Milot , Sylvain Bodard
{"title":"Evaluation of navigation and robotic systems for percutaneous image-guided interventions: A novel metric for advanced imaging and artificial intelligence integration","authors":"Francois H. Cornelis , Dimitrios K Filippiadis , Philipp Wiggermann , Stephen B. Solomon , David C. Madoff , Laurent Milot , Sylvain Bodard","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Navigation and robotic systems aim to improve the accuracy and efficiency of percutaneous image-guided interventions, but the evaluation of their autonomy and integration of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of automation and integration of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence in navigation and robotic systems for percutaneous image-guided interventions, using established and novel metrics to categorize and compare their capabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to identify studies on clinically validated navigation and robotic systems published between 2000 and May 2024. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. Data on navigation devices were extracted and analyzed. The levels of autonomy in surgical robotics (LASR) classification system (from 1 to 5) was used to analyze automation. A novel taxonomy, the Levels of Integration of Advanced Imaging and AI (LIAI2) classification system, was created to categorize the integration of imaging technologies and AI (from 1 to 5). These two scores were combined into an aggregate score (from 1 to 10) to reflect the autonomy in percutaneous image-guided intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review included 20 studies assessing two navigation systems and eight robotic devices. The median LASR score was 1 (Q1, Q3: 1, 1), the median LIAI2 score was 2 (Q1, Q3: 2, 3), and the median aggregate score was 3 (Q1, Q3: 3, 4). Only one robotic system (10 % of those reviewed) achieved the highest LASR qualification in the literature, a level 2/5. Four systems (40 %) shared the highest rating for LIAI2, which was a score of 3/5. Four systems (40 %) achieved the highest aggregate scores of 4/10.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>None of the navigation and robotic systems achieved full autonomy for percutaneous image-guided intervention. The LASR and LIAI2 scales can guide innovation by identifying areas for further development and integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":"106 5","pages":"Pages 157-168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143068969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vincent Le Pennec, Frédéric Douane, Jean Luc Brun, Francine Thouveny, Thomas Martinelli, Marine Bravetti, Charles Mastier, Yan Le Bras, André Rogopoulos, Pierre Antoine Barral, Henri Marret, Pascal Chabrot, Alexis Jacquier, Quentin Senechal, Gary Doppelt, Julien Frandon
{"title":"Endovascular management of pelvic congestion syndrome: An expert consensus statement from the French Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (SFICV), Interventional Radiology Federation (FRI), College of French Radiology Teachers (CERF), and French Society of Women's Imaging (SIFEM).","authors":"Vincent Le Pennec, Frédéric Douane, Jean Luc Brun, Francine Thouveny, Thomas Martinelli, Marine Bravetti, Charles Mastier, Yan Le Bras, André Rogopoulos, Pierre Antoine Barral, Henri Marret, Pascal Chabrot, Alexis Jacquier, Quentin Senechal, Gary Doppelt, Julien Frandon","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) is a major cause of chronic pelvic pain in women of reproductive age. It is often associated with pelvic venous insufficiency and venous dilatation of the ovarian and uterine veins, resulting in a variety of symptoms exacerbated by venous hypertension. Despite its prevalence, PCS lacks standardized diagnostic and management protocols, making effective treatment challenging. The purpose of this expert consensus statement was to summarize the opinions of French radiologists and gynecologists regarding the diagnosis, imaging, treatment, and management of PCS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A working group of 14 expert radiologists and gynecologists from various French medical centers used a Delphi panel approach with several rounds of remote and face-to-face meetings to formulate and refine expert opinions based on the current literature and clinical expertise. These opinions were categorized according to diagnostic criteria, imaging techniques, therapeutic options, and follow-up protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group formulated 72 initial opinions, and 65 were retained after rigorous evaluation for consensus. Key diagnostic tools include Doppler ultrasound for detection of venous reflux and magnetic resonance imaging for detailed assessment of venous anatomy. Endovascular embolization was highlighted as the primary treatment approach and recommended after thorough imaging evaluation. Noninvasive treatments and multidisciplinary care were also emphasized for comprehensive management. The expert opinion also included post-treatment follow-up to assess quality of life and symptom resolution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This structured consensus approach helped develop standardized expert opinions on management of, providing clear guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. These guidelines should improve clinical practice and patient care in the management of PCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144051346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pierre Baseilhac, Nicolas Romain-Scelle, Amna Klich, Sébastien Crouzet, Marc Colombel, Alain Ruffion, Muriel Rabilloud, Olivier Rouvière
{"title":"Relaxing the PI-RADS dominant sequence rule improves the characterization of high-grade prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI.","authors":"Pierre Baseilhac, Nicolas Romain-Scelle, Amna Klich, Sébastien Crouzet, Marc Colombel, Alain Ruffion, Muriel Rabilloud, Olivier Rouvière","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 2.0 (PI-RADSv2.0) and 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1) scores are deduced from the pulse sequence categories using the \"dominant sequence\" scoring rule. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a new scoring rule that makes better use of non-dominant pulse sequence findings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The new scoring rule was developed using a single-center database of 1627 patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI and prostate biopsy. The combinations of PI-RADSv2.0 pulse sequence categories observed at sextant level were ranked based on their rate of high-grade (grade group ≥ 2) prostate cancer and assigned to one of the five levels of the new score. Then, a hidden evaluation dataset of 240 MRI lesions to which 21 readers of varying experience had assigned PI-RADSv2.1 pulse sequence categories was used. For each reader, the PI-RADSv2.1 score of the lesions (PI-RADSv2.1 dominant sequence rule) and the new score (scoring rule defined in the development cohort) were computed. The scores were compared using areas under the curve (AUC), sensitivities, specificities, reproducibility, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all readers, the mean AUC of the new score (0.78; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.83) was significantly greater than that of the PI-RADSv2.1 score (0.76; 95 % CI: 0.71-0.81; P < 0.01). The new score showed lower sensitivity, higher specificity and better inter-reader agreement in all reader experience subgroups. Across all readers, for a ≥ 3 dichotomization, it provided a higher net benefit than the PIRADSv2.1 score for risk thresholds > 0.15.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new scoring rule outperformed the dominant sequence rule in characterizing high-grade prostate cancer regardless of reader experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144017392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
François Cornud, Eric M Walser, Katelijne Cc de Bie, Arnaud Lefevre, Marc Galiano
{"title":"Laser-focused ablative therapy for prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review of current applications and future directions.","authors":"François Cornud, Eric M Walser, Katelijne Cc de Bie, Arnaud Lefevre, Marc Galiano","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Focal Laser ablation (FLA), or interstitial Laser thermotherapy, is a promising minimally invasive approach for the treatment of localized prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia. This technique is gaining popularity among patients due to its ability to preserve pre-treatment quality of life. The examination is performed under magnetic resonance imaging (in bore) or ultrasound guidance, via a percutaneous transrectal or transperineal route. Under transperineal ultrasound guidance, FLA can use up to four Laser fibers to create confluent zones of tissue ablation, enabling treatment of larger prostate- or tumor volumes. Primary indications for FLA include intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia refractory to medical treatment due to ineffectiveness or side effects. The intervention is typically performed under light sedation or under locoregional anesthesia. FLA lasts approximately 10 min, with a total intervention time of < 60 min on an outpatient basis. Patients are often discharged with either a suprapubic or bladder catheter to prevent urinary retention, especially if the ablated area is close to the urethra. Minor complications are rare and limited to transient voiding dysfunction, urinary tract infection, or hematuria. Major complications, such as rectoprostatic fistula, are avoided by rectoprostatic hydrodissection. FLA is an effective, well-tolerated option in the minimally invasive treatment of prostate disease, offering rapid treatment times, low complication rates, and preservation of quality of life for appropriately selected patients. However, variability in recurrence rates following FLA for prostate cancer highlights the need for further investigation into optimal patient selection for this treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144035593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Image quality and dose reduction with photon counting detector CT: Comparison between ultra-high resolution mode and standard mode using a phantom study.","authors":"Joël Greffier, Claire Van Ngoc Ty, Skander Sammoud, Cédric Croisille, Jean-Paul Beregi, Djamel Dabli, Isabelle Fitton","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality and dose reduction potential of ultra-high resolution (UHR) mode compared with standard mode, both available on a commercial photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCCT) scanner.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Images were acquired on a PCCT with a phantom using UHR and standard modes at three dose levels (3/6/12 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using soft tissue (Br36) and bone (Br68) reconstruction kernels and 0.4-mm slice thickness. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were calculated to assess noise magnitude, noise texture (f<sub>av</sub>), and spatial resolution (f<sub>50</sub>), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were calculated to model the detection of two abdominal lesions for a Br36 soft tissue reconstruction kernel and three bone lesions for a Br68 bone reconstruction kernel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with UHR than with standard mode (mean difference, -18.0 ± 2.6 [standard deviation (SD)] % for Br36 and -33.9 ± 2.3 [SD] % for Br68). Noise texture was lower with UHR than with standard mode (mean difference, -4.2 ± 0.9 [SD] % for Br36 and -16.0 ± 1.8 [SD] % for Br68). For the solid water insert and Br36, f<sub>50</sub> values were similar for both UHR (0.34 ± [SD] 0.04 mm<sup>-1</sup>) and standard (0.33 ± [SD] 0.04 mm<sup>-1</sup>) modes. For Br68, f<sub>50</sub> values were greater with UHR than with standard for iodine (mean difference, 18.5 ± 1.9 [SD] %) and bone (11.7 ± 5.7 [SD] %) inserts. For all simulated lesions, d' values were greater with UHR than with standard and, compared to standard, the dose reduction potential with UHR was -32.9 ± 0.0 (SD) % for abdominal lesions and -68.7 ± 3.2 (SD) % for bone lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the standard mode, the UHR mode offers lower noise levels and better detectability of abdominal and bone lesions, paving the way for potential dose reduction with PCCT in clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143812728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Real-world validation of a deep learning algorithm for chest radiography in the emergency department: A tale of two specialties.","authors":"Bo Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143812680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Efficacy of a deep learning-based software for chest X-ray analysis in an emergency department.","authors":"Sathiyamurthy Selvam, Olivier Peyrony, Arben Elezi, Adelia Braganca, Anne-Marie Zagdanski, Lucie Biard, Jessica Assouline, Guillaume Chassagnon, Guillaume Mulier, Constance de Margerie-Mellon","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2025.03.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a deep learning (DL)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system for the detection of abnormalities on chest X-rays performed in an emergency department setting, where readers have access to relevant clinical information.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four hundred and four consecutive chest X-rays performed over a two-month period in patients presenting to an emergency department with respiratory symptoms were retrospectively collected. Five readers (two radiologists, three emergency physicians) with access to clinical information were asked to identify five abnormalities (i.e., consolidation, lung nodule, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, mediastinal/hilar mass) in the dataset without assistance, and then after a 2-week period, with the assistance of a DL-based CAD system. The reference standard was a chest X-ray consensus review by two experienced radiologists. Reader performances were compared between the reading sessions, and interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset included 118 occurrences of the five abnormalities in 103 chest X-rays. The CAD system improved sensitivity for consolidation, pleural effusion, and nodule, with respective absolute differences of 8.3 % (95 % CI: 3.8-12.7; P < 0.001), 7.9 % (95 % CI: 1.7-14.1; P = 0.012), and 29.5 % (95 % CI: 19.8-38.2; P < 0.001), respectively. Specificity was greater than 89 % for all abnormalities and showed a minimal but significant decrease with DL for nodules and mediastinal/hilar masses (-1.8 % [95 % CI: -2.7 - -0.9]; P < 0.001 and -0.8 % [95 % CI: -1.5 - -0.2]; P = 0.005). Inter-observer agreement improved with DL, with kappa values ranging from 0.40 [95 % CI: 0.37-0.43] for mediastinal/hilar mass to 0.84 [95 % CI: 0.81-0.87] for pneumothorax.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that DL-assisted reading increases the sensitivity for detecting important chest X-ray abnormalities in the emergency department, even when clinical information is available to the radiologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143781705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maxime Barat , Camille Ollivier , Linda Taibi , Véronique Nitsche , Philippe Sogni , Philippe Soyer , Lucia Parlati , Anthony Dohan , Hendy Abdoul , Marie-Pierre Revel
{"title":"Standard of care versus standard of care plus Ericksonian hypnosis for percutaneous liver biopsy: Results of a randomized control trial","authors":"Maxime Barat , Camille Ollivier , Linda Taibi , Véronique Nitsche , Philippe Sogni , Philippe Soyer , Lucia Parlati , Anthony Dohan , Hendy Abdoul , Marie-Pierre Revel","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare levels of pain and anxiety during percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy between patients receiving standard of care and those receiving standard of care plus the support of Ericksonian hypnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled superiority trial included 70 participants. Participants were randomly assigned to either the standard of care group and received oral anxiolytic medications with reassuring conversational support, or to the experimental group, and received Ericksonian hypnosis (<em>i.e., conversational hypnosis</em>) in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was the level of pain experienced during the biopsy, measured on a 10-point visual analog scale (0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating excruciating pain). Secondary outcomes included anxiety level during the biopsy, pain level within one hour of the biopsy measured using the same 10-point visual analog scale, amount of analgesic medication taken in the 24 h following the biopsy, and patient willingness to undergo another ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in the future.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-six participants were included in the standard of care group, and 34 were included in the experimental group. The mean score of pain experienced during the biopsy was lower in the experimental group (2.4 ± 1.9 [standard deviation (SD)]) compared to the standard of care group (4.4 ± 2.6 [SD]) (<em>P</em> = 0.001). The level of anxiety experienced during the biopsy was lower in the hypnosis group (2.1 ± 1.8 [SD]) compared to the standard of care group (4.8 ± 2.4 [SD]) (<em>P</em> < 0.001). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The addition of Ericksonian hypnosis to standard of care reduces the pain experienced by patients during percutaneous ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy by comparison with standard of care alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":"106 3","pages":"Pages 93-97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}