Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Hippolyte Kessler, Lieve Morbée, Nicolas Douis, Fatma Boubaker, Romain Gillet, Alain Blum
{"title":"Mineralized tissue visualization with MRI: Practical insights and recommendations for optimized clinical applications.","authors":"Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Hippolyte Kessler, Lieve Morbée, Nicolas Douis, Fatma Boubaker, Romain Gillet, Alain Blum","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that enhance the visualization of mineralized tissues (hereafter referred to as MT-MRI) are increasingly being incorporated into clinical practice, particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. These techniques aim to mimic the contrast provided by computed tomography (CT), while taking advantage of MRI's superior soft tissue contrast and lack of ionizing radiation. However, the variety of MT-MRI techniques, including three-dimensional gradient-echo, ultra-short and zero-echo time, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and artificial intelligence-generated synthetic CT, each offer different technical characteristics, advantages, and limitations. Understanding these differences is critical to optimizing clinical application. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most commonly used MT-MRI techniques, categorizing them based on their technical principles and clinical utility. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach, including their performance in bone morphology assessment, fracture detection, arthropathy-related findings, and soft tissue calcification evaluation are discussed. Additionally, technical limitations and artifacts that may affect image quality and diagnostic accuracy, such as susceptibility effects, signal-to-noise ratio issues, and motion artifacts are addressed. Despite promising developments, MT-MRI remains inferior to conventional CT for evaluating subtle bone abnormalities and soft tissue calcification due to spatial resolution limitations. However, advances in deep learning and hardware innovations, such as artificial intelligence-generated synthetic CT and ultrahigh-field MRI, may bridge this gap in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.11.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that enhance the visualization of mineralized tissues (hereafter referred to as MT-MRI) are increasingly being incorporated into clinical practice, particularly in musculoskeletal imaging. These techniques aim to mimic the contrast provided by computed tomography (CT), while taking advantage of MRI's superior soft tissue contrast and lack of ionizing radiation. However, the variety of MT-MRI techniques, including three-dimensional gradient-echo, ultra-short and zero-echo time, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and artificial intelligence-generated synthetic CT, each offer different technical characteristics, advantages, and limitations. Understanding these differences is critical to optimizing clinical application. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most commonly used MT-MRI techniques, categorizing them based on their technical principles and clinical utility. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach, including their performance in bone morphology assessment, fracture detection, arthropathy-related findings, and soft tissue calcification evaluation are discussed. Additionally, technical limitations and artifacts that may affect image quality and diagnostic accuracy, such as susceptibility effects, signal-to-noise ratio issues, and motion artifacts are addressed. Despite promising developments, MT-MRI remains inferior to conventional CT for evaluating subtle bone abnormalities and soft tissue calcification due to spatial resolution limitations. However, advances in deep learning and hardware innovations, such as artificial intelligence-generated synthetic CT and ultrahigh-field MRI, may bridge this gap in the future.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English.
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.