Sustainable Production and Consumption最新文献

{"title":"Reducing environmental pressure through a more circular consumption of clothes","authors":"Julia Koch ,&nbsp;Harry Wilting ,&nbsp;Kees Vringer ,&nbsp;Linda Steg ,&nbsp;Ellen van der Werff","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clothing production and consumption contribute to various environmental problems, such as climate change and environmental pollution. With the expected growth in demand, these negative effects will only increase. Consumers making sustainable choices in the acquisition, use and disposal of garments can play a critical role in the reduction of such environmental pressures. This study, taking a circular economy perspective, assesses to what extent the adoption of circular consumer behaviour in the Netherlands could reduce environmental pressures related to clothing and which behavioural changes are most effective in doing so.</div><div>In our analysis we incorporated 14 types of behaviours, all based on a framework for consumer options related to the circular economy. To provide a realistic estimation of the environmental reduction potential of these behaviours, we not only calculated the theoretical environmental reduction potential of each behaviour but also considered behavioural plasticity (i.e., the share of consumers that do not yet engage in a behaviour but would be willing to do so) and interactions between behaviours. The theoretical reduction potential was calculated with a combination of input-output- and process analysis, and the behavioural plasticity was based on survey data of a study among Dutch consumers.</div><div>Our results show that a more circular consumption of clothing in the Netherlands could reduce approximately 11–19 % of greenhouse gas emissions and approximately 3–29 % of land use related to clothing. Buying fewer new clothes, and choosing more durable garments, garments made from more environmentally-friendly and from recycled materials are behaviours that have the highest reduction potential when behavioural plasticity is considered. Renting clothes, buying second-hand, repairing, and changes in washing and drying behaviour have a lower reduction potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 396-411"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144704361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Unveiling hidden environmental costs and optimizing sustainable BATs screening in finished fabrics production: An LCA-based approach","authors":"Siyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Gan ,&nbsp;Quan Zhou ,&nbsp;Chenye Xu ,&nbsp;Chensi Shen ,&nbsp;Fang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of best available techniques (BATs) is crucial for the sustainable development of the textile industry. However, the selection of BATs is typically based on technical feasibility and immediate environmental benefits, while neglecting comprehensive environmental impacts and hidden costs. This study developed a comprehensive method integrating life cycle assessment (LCA), environmental price, and the VIKOR model with the entropy weight method to evaluate the environmental performance and hidden costs associated with the production of finished fabrics, and to screen sustainable BATs. The results revealed that the overall environmental burden of polyester finished fabrics was 13.30 % lower than that of cotton based on the normalized results. Fiber production was identified as the primary contributor to environmental loads, accounting for an average of 50.67 % of the total environmental burden in the cotton finished fabrics, and 57.75 % in the polyester, respectively. In monetary terms, cotton incurred a higher cost of € 9256.08 per ton, compared to € 4646.72 for polyester, indicating superior eco-efficiency. Additionally, BAT 24 (foam coating technology), BAT 17 (supercritical carbon dioxide dyeing), and BAT 29 (control of mineral oils and sizing agents) were selected as the top priority BATs for sustainable development. These findings highlight the importance of selecting fabrics based on both environmental sustainability and economic considerations. Moreover, the adoption of sustainable BATs can enhance both environmental and economic performance across the textile production value chain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 334-350"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A systematic literature review on circularity assessment indicators and frameworks in the built environment","authors":"Qiuxian Li ,&nbsp;Dirk Saelens ,&nbsp;Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin ,&nbsp;Rengin Aslanoğlu ,&nbsp;Joost van Hoof ,&nbsp;Chiara Piccardo","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 412-431"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144723868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supply chain circularity composite index: Measuring the closed-loopedness of material flows","authors":"Jacob Kopeinig ,&nbsp;Kevin Anton Kriechbaum ,&nbsp;Julia Köberl ,&nbsp;Helmut Zsifkovits","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition from linear to circular economic models presents a critical challenge for sustainable industrial development, particularly in the context of complex, multi-tiered manufacturing supply chains. Despite the rise of circularity indicators, many existing metrics suffer from excessive data requirements, poor harmonization, and a lack of system-level applicability. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing the Supply Chain Circularity Composite Index, a novel performance metric designed to quantify the closed-loopedness of material flows using a Material Flow Analysis-based approach. The index aggregates three key sub-indicators - Material Efficiency, Secondary Material Usage, and Effectiveness of Recovery - into a composite score using the geometric mean to reflect proportional sensitivity and interdependency among supply chain actors. The index was developed through a systematic literature review of 59 foundational circularity metrics and validated through case studies in two manufacturing companies operating in distinct industrial sectors, the plastics and the gas engine manufacturing industry. Results demonstrate variation in circularity performance revealing distinct circularity profiles across the cases: The plastics manufacturer, with moderate values across all dimensions, achieved an overall circularity score of 0.35, whereas the gas engine firm showed the significantly higher level of secondary material usage (0.56) but was limited by a low recovery effectiveness of just 0.06, resulting in an overall circularity score of 0.30. These outcomes illustrate the index's diagnostic power to pinpoint specific strengths and deficiencies across the material loop. The index thus provides a scalable and operationally feasible indicator for companies aiming to improve material circularity across supply chain boundaries, and serves as a strategic instrument for aligning business practices with emerging regulatory and sustainability frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 351-363"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Wind farms through the lens of sustainability and circularity: Integrating environmental, economic, and social dimensions","authors":"Ana Arias ,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Moreira ,&nbsp;Gumersindo Feijoo","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of a sustainable energy transition is one of the strategic objectives in Europe, and wind energy plays a key role, as its production capacity has increased significantly in recent decades. However, to verify that wind farm projects are indeed sustainable, it is necessary to apply appropriate methodologies to assess the three pillars of sustainable development: environmental, social and economic. In addition, a comparison with traditional energy resources of fossil origin is necessary, seeking to identify the benefits and challenges associated with these renewable energy alternatives, as well as the study of how wind farms adhere circular economy principles. The idea of this analysis is to avoid past mistakes, such as the depletion of essential resources, for example the depletion of rare elements, used for the construction of renewable energy facilities. It is in this framework that this comprehensive and critical review is developed, with the aim of providing information on the actual production of wind energy in the European context, its potential environmental benefits and effects, the socio-economic constraints and benefits that wind farm projects could bring, as well as the gaps and challenges identified in the value chain. It is hoped that this critical review can be considered as a guide for policy makers, researchers and stakeholders on the main constraints that could slow down wind energy technologies, on the environmental footprint of wind farms and its comparison with fossil energy, on the potentialities of wind projects to increase employment opportunities and economic growth, and on the main concerns of social communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 277-292"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144596594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social acceptance and economic impacts of biomethane: A resource for energy sustainability","authors":"Idiano D'Adamo ,&nbsp;Francesco Ferella ,&nbsp;Matteo Fuoco ,&nbsp;Massimo Gastaldi","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomethane represents a promising resource within the framework of the circular bioeconomy, enabling the substitution of fossil gas with a renewable alternative through the valorisation of substrates and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The present study explored the social dimension of sustainability by means of an online survey and statistical analysis, based on 403 responses primarily from the municipality of Rome – a city facing pronounced waste management challenges. The findings indicate that public knowledge acts as a key enabler in supporting biomethane as a sustainable development initiative; however, public opinion remains neutral regarding the construction of such plants in close proximity to residential areas. The perceived benefits include improved waste management and enhanced energy and material autonomy. Respondents reported a willingness to pay an 11.2 % premium for biomethane, while expecting an 18.7 % reduction in waste taxation. The resulting benefits could be reinvested in public infrastructure or directed towards supporting economically vulnerable families. To advance this agenda, integrated policies are essential to foster both technological innovation and social inclusion. Biomethane thus emerges as a strategic solution aligned with Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 12.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 221-236"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144570212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Border regulation and greenhouse gas emissions from EU-UK food trade","authors":"Elena Benedetti ,&nbsp;Luca Panzone ,&nbsp;Livia Cabernard ,&nbsp;John Wildman ,&nbsp;Chris Seal","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent years have seen an increase in global trade. Despite well-known welfare benefits, trade in goods is also an important contributor of greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental regulation of trade is complex, because environmental domestic regulation can drive the relocation of these emissions abroad (carbon leakage); while environmental import restrictions can increase domestic greenhouse gas emissions by stimulating the production of high‑carbon goods (inverse leakage). In this article, we micro-simulate the impact at the border of a carbon tariff on food trade, modelling UK food imports from the European Union using a gravity model. In this exercise, we implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which charges for the difference in carbon emissions of a good between importer and exporter. Yearly country-level greenhouse gas emissions are calculated using a top-down life-cycle assessment approach known as environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output analysis. Results show that a British food Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would cut annual emissions imported from the European Union by around 25 % through trade reallocation. The findings indicate that carbon border regulation is an important tool for promoting more sustainable food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 251-266"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144580707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Navigating sustainability transitions: A science for policy approach","authors":"Heinz Schandl ,&nbsp;Andrea Walton ,&nbsp;Sandra Oliver ,&nbsp;Guy Barnett ,&nbsp;Stuart Whitten","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The world faces an unprecedented convergence of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, collectively referred to as the Triple Planetary Crisis. These interlinked challenges, compounded by rising inequality and weakened governance, threaten progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and demand a transformative response. This review article adopts an integrative approach grounded in ecological economics, social-ecological systems theory, and sustainability science to examine the dynamic interactions between economic growth, resource use, environmental degradation, and social well-being. The findings underscore that technological innovation and efficiency improvements alone are insufficient to achieve sustainable production and consumption. Instead, the transition requires systemic change, including shifts in production and consumption patterns, institutional reform, and redefined notions of prosperity. It identifies key steps in the co-production of the transition pathway and five key shifts in provision systems that, taken together, can achieve science-based policy reform through interdisciplinary collaboration, co-production of knowledge, and adaptive governance, thereby navigating complexity and uncertainty in policymaking. By focusing on these critical aspects, this research provides a comprehensive framework for navigating the transition to a sustainable future within planetary boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 385-395"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144663477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Building with biomass using tropical timber as a negative emissions technology (NET): Sustainability assessment, comparison with other bio-based NETs and their potential in Malaysia","authors":"Djasmine Mastisya Saharudin,&nbsp;Harish Kumar Jeswani,&nbsp;Adisa Azapagic","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Building with biomass is a negative emissions technology (NET) that can be used to store CO₂ in the built environment. As countries seek scalable climate solutions, understanding the viability of such approaches in developing nations is increasingly critical. This paper is the first to determine the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of building with biomass using timber, focusing on the residential housing sector in a developing country such as Malaysia. Four tropical hardwood species are considered: resak, keruing, sesenduk and rubber. The environmental assessment comprises 18 life cycle assessment impacts and the economic assessment focuses on life cycle costs. The system boundary includes all activities from cradle to grave, i.e. from timber production to house demolition. All timber species result in net-negative global warming potential (GWP), ranging from −473 to −736 kg CO₂ eq./t CO₂ removed without the credits for energy savings in the use stage relative to concrete houses dominant in Malaysia. With the credits, the savings in the emissions are around 30–60 % greater (−745 to −973 kg CO₂ eq./t CO₂ removed). Resak and rubber perform best overall, while sesenduk ranks lowest across most impacts. The life cycle costs are estimated at US$338–823/t CO₂ removed across the scenarios and timber types, with resak being the least and keruing the most expensive option. Assuming all houses are built from one type of timber could remove from 47 Mt CO₂ (sesenduk) to 98 Mt CO₂ (resak) over 50 years, reducing 4–8 % of the country's agricultural emissions annually at the cost from US$38 bn (rubber) to US$83 bn (keruing). Using an optimal combination of the four timber types would remove 89.12 Mt CO₂ over 50 years at a total cost of US$53.5 bn. However, in comparison with other bio-based NETs, building with biomass is the least sustainable option. Reforestation is the best alternative, removing 153–587 Mt CO₂ at a total cost of −US$10.2 bn (profit) to US$5.8 bn over 50 years, followed by bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) with 840 Mt CO₂ and US$63.6 bn over 30 years and biochar with 248 Mt CO₂ and US$21.5 bn over 20 years. Utilising the country's available resources with an optimal mix of the four bio-NETs could remove 27.5 Mt CO₂ per year (9.5 % of Malaysia's annual emissions) at a cost of US$1.92 bn/yr. Over the lifetime of the NETs, this would amount to a total CO₂ removal of 930 Mt at a cost of US$56 bn. These results can be used to inform policy and other decision makers on the optimal deployment of bio-based NETs in Malaysia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 293-318"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Farm-level environmental sustainability assessment of agricultural pest control strategies across Europe","authors":"Farshad Soheilifard ,&nbsp;Jennifer Mark ,&nbsp;Yuyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Peter Fantke","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chemical pesticides used in plant protection products (PPPs) play an important role in securing crop yields but also contribute to ecosystem and human health impact. To understand environmental implications of pesticide usage across farming systems and strategies, we quantify the environmental impacts of pest control for 160 farms across 10 European countries, applying a full life cycle perspective. We integrate emission estimates from pesticide field applications, environmental interventions from supply chain processes, and spatial variation in ecological pressure. Results reveal that farm-level impact performance is highly affected by the type of pest control agents applied. Copper-based fungicides were identified to drive the chemical footprint in terms of human toxicity and ecotoxicity impacts across conventional, integrated pest management (IPM), and organic pest control scenarios, associated with supply chain and field-level emissions. Almost all considered organic farming scenarios performed better than IPM or conventional farming with respect to their chemical footprint (i.e. human toxicity and ecotoxicity impacts), with similar impact profiles for IPM and conventional farming practices. Due to reported extensive use of copper-based fungicides, some IPM and organic farming scenarios showed high toxicity impacts, driving overall human health and ecosystem quality impact for these scenarios. Spatial analysis highlights that only a limited number of pesticides contributes to local potential exceedance of ecotoxicity pressure across catchments. Our findings emphasize the role of supply chain emissions, including diesel fuel used for agricultural machinery and pesticide production, as important contributors to life cycle impacts, including impacts on climate change and natural resources. We identified critical trade-offs between pest control strategies, such as reduced chemical footprints from avoiding synthetic pesticides versus increased resource use and greenhouse gas emissions in IPM and organic farming scenarios. We highlight the importance of designing pest control strategies that minimize environmental impacts while maintaining agricultural productivity. Our study offers actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, informing the transition toward sustainable pest control practices aligned with European Green Deal objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 237-250"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144570214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}