Qiuxian Li , Dirk Saelens , Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin , Rengin Aslanoğlu , Joost van Hoof , Chiara Piccardo
{"title":"建筑环境循环性评价指标和框架的系统文献综述","authors":"Qiuxian Li , Dirk Saelens , Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin , Rengin Aslanoğlu , Joost van Hoof , Chiara Piccardo","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 412-431"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review on circularity assessment indicators and frameworks in the built environment\",\"authors\":\"Qiuxian Li , Dirk Saelens , Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin , Rengin Aslanoğlu , Joost van Hoof , Chiara Piccardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 412-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Production and Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001484\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001484","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic literature review on circularity assessment indicators and frameworks in the built environment
A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.