{"title":"Flexibility justice: Exploring the relationship between electrical vehicle charging behaviors, demand flexibility and psychological factors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103753","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is transforming the landscape of energy consumption. While the technical and economic dimensions of EV adoption are increasingly well understood, the aspect of justice in demand flexibility remains underexplored. This study examines the complex relationship between flexibility in EV charging behaviors and the influence of socio-psychological and justice factors. We explore a range of demographic and social-psychological variables including charging anxiety, environmental concerns, perceived cost-saving perception, perceived privacy, and trust in utility providers. Our results reveal that these variables positively influence the changes in charging habits, including time-shifting and load-reduction. This study also uncovers disparities in charging behavior adjustments across various demographics groups. For instance, White respondents are more likely to charge their EVs during off-peak hours than their non-White counterparts and homeowners show a greater intention to reduce EV charging load during peak hours compared to renters. Additionally, high-income individuals exhibit a stronger willingness to shift charging times to off-peak, with White respondents within the high-income group being the most likely to reduce the amount of charging load during peak hours. Conversely, low-income White respondents are less inclined to make such adjustments. These disparities are likely tied to socioeconomic status, as more vulnerable groups often face greater constraints in adjusting their schedules. Therefore, it is imperative that policies prioritize flexibility justice by addressing the specific needs and behaviors of vulnerable groups, aiming to mitigate the additional burdens resulting from their limited flexibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lifecycle social impacts of lithium-ion batteries: Consequences and future research agenda for a safe and just transition","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103756","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103756","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are essential in the low-carbon energy transition. However, the social consequences of LIBs throughout the entire lifecycle have been insufficiently explored in the literature. To address this gap, this study conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, and conflicts in the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice associated with LIBs lifecycle. The UNEP Social Lifecycle Assessment framework was utilised for categorisation of stakeholders and social impacts categories. The socio-ecological dynamics and consequences of the global production of LIBs were analysed from the perspective of the Safe and Just operating spaces of the Doughnut Economics (DE). The main results indicate that Worker, Local community, and Society are the most investigated stakeholders, while Consumers, Value chain actors and Children are overlooked. Social impact subcategories related to Safe and healthy living conditions and Access to material resources receive more attention due to social concerns about environmental and social degradation associated with raw material extraction in the LIBs lifecycle. The analysis from DE framework reveals that the increased business as usual production of LIBs can hinder the achievement of a safe and just transition due to undesired socio-ecological consequences, such as increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, air pollution, land degradation, biodiversity loss, and water pollution that leading to increase poverty, inequality, discrimination (gender and race), health damage, corruption, and conflicts. More research is needed to understand and simulate social consequences of LIBs lifecycle. To this end, a holistic future research agenda is provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Risk preferences, bill increases and the future reliability of electricity networks in Australia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103763","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103763","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid uptake in renewable energy there are emerging risks for countries that rapidly displace baseload generation with intermittent sources. Whilst these risks can be mitigated with storage technologies, the cost to do so, is ultimately passed onto households in the form of higher electricity bills. We use a discrete choice experiment to explore some of the potential trade-offs households might be willing to consider in order to experience lower bill increases including delaying electricity infrastructure investments as well as demand-side management policies. Respondents were asked to evaluate alternative electricity contracts with lower cost increases, delayed renewable and battery storage investments and the potential imposition of consumption limits. We also explore how household risk attitudes explain differences in compensation required within a mixed logit model. Our results suggest that households which are highly risk-averse may require more compensation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003542/pdfft?md5=1e38e01acabc9f5bb63c0dd55d79e78a&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003542-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Making energy justice work for women in rural sub-Saharan Africa: A quantitative diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103754","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103754","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using quantitative and qualitative evidence from an extensive survey of 2291 rural households in three West African countries, this article adopts normative framework based on the energy justice framework (EJF) as well as on the capability approach to identify situations of injustice with vulnerable groups and specific interventions to improve the conditions of this group. It operationalizes and discusses the concepts of availability, affordability, due process, transparency and accountability as well as sustainability with a perspective on gender equity. Accordingly, our study adopts both an ex-ante (the framework informing evidence) and an ex-post (evidence informing the framework) approach. The results show that a capability approach to energy justice requires a bottom-up, individualistic approach that allows a better identification of energy injustices. For instance, the evidence based on an original operationalization of energy availability considering opportunity costs shows that women have less access to energy and are more exposed to health problems than their male counterparts; this proposition also results in a picture showing more energy poverty than previously known. Also, their limited involvement in energy-related decision-making in the household further perpetuates the vicious cycle of time poverty, income poverty and energy poverty. Furthermore, without specific improvements in social justice for women in rural areas, increasing electricity access in rural areas is unlikely to translate into more energy justice as well as more capabilities for women; in effect, social injustices tend to block the material gains. From a policy perspective, the main recommendation focuses on women and targets the elimination of the ‘worse-case scenario’, that is, the least efficient cookstoves with fetched fuelwood for increasing the capabilities of women and improve the overall energy justice in West African countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uncertain transitions: Affects in the coal supply chain from Colombia to Poland","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103740","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103740","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the dynamic affective responses along the cross-Atlantic coal supply chain from Colombia to Poland in the context of changing conditions triggered by the war in Ukraine following Russia's invasion in February 2022. Based on ethnographic fieldwork and a review of press releases and documents, our analysis focuses on the affects, emotions, social relations, and tensions resulting from people's everyday interactions with coal. We explore how unexpected events altered these interactions and how affective responses can shed light on the dynamic processes involved in the energy transition from coal. We argue that the transition is a non-linear process characterized by the diverse ways in which actors along coal supply chains experience, conceptualize, and represent it. In the context of these shifting dynamics, coal emerges as an ambiguous resource, viewed both as an outdated and polluting energy source that dispossesses Indigenous people and contributes to global warming and as a familiar and reliable fuel that provides a sense of security, maintains social relations, and remains an integral component of the global energy matrix. We conclude that a just energy transition from coal requires accounting for its complexity along supply chains, acknowledging the affective dimension of processes of change and continuity, and understanding the power dynamics between corporate agents, the state, and communities at extraction and consumption sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003311/pdfft?md5=865eb5a25161dcdd1863407e785bb4a1&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003311-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards a just AI-assisted energy transitions for vulnerable communities","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103752","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103752","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This Perspective overviews the role and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in accelerating the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy technologies and systems. We pay close attention to and speculate the probable impacts of AI on communities which are already vulnerable to the effects of energy transition and discuss how these impacts can be mitigated. In addition to a short literature review, we employed the assistive capabilities of a Generative AI chatbot through hypothetical roleplays to provide feedback on proposed mitigative measures. We highlight society-positive and society-negative impacts, emphasising the implications for just energy transition. We suggest potential measures to address these issues using the energy justice framework, including developing accurate training datasets, community-based mitigation policies, and establishing participative decision-making channels. We argue that human discretion must remain paramount, particularly in ensuring participative policymaking that safeguards social equity protection for vulnerable communities in AI-assisted energy transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Elderly well-being amidst energy poverty: Exploring the health, social, and economic impacts in Vietnam","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103762","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103762","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vietnam's electrification increased access from 14 % in 1990 to 97 % by 2010, yet by 2017, 25 % of households still faced inadequate electricity, and nearly a third relied on traditional fuels. This energy poverty, particularly among the elderly, continues to affect well-being and health as the population ages. This study investigates the impact of energy poverty on the life satisfaction of elderly individuals, using data from the 2011 Vietnam National Aging Survey. As one of the first studies to explore this relationship in Vietnam, it contributes to the literature by providing valuable empirical evidence of the causal link between energy poverty and life satisfaction, shedding light on the mechanisms behind the observed effects. By adopting a multidimensional approach, we measure energy poverty across three distinct thresholds. To address potential endogeneity concerns, we employ a two-stage least squares regression, using provincial-level information and communications technology infrastructure as an instrumental variable. Our findings consistently demonstrate that energy poverty significantly and negatively impacts the life satisfaction of the elderly across all three measures. To ensure the robustness of our results, we conduct additional tests, including alternative constructions of energy poverty and the use of different instrumental variables, such as the number of Internet users per 100 population at the provincial level. We further validate our conclusions through other methods, including plausible exogenous instrumental variables and double/debiased machine learning, confirming the stability and reliability of our findings. Additionally, we identify two key pathways through which energy poverty affects life satisfaction: physical health and mental health.</div></div><div><h3>Subject classification codes</h3><div>D10, I10, I15, O10, O18.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Harboring change: Exploring the multifaceted and complex determinants of decarbonizing ports","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores port decarbonisation as more than just a technological challenge, highlighting other key determinants often overlooked in the literature. The main aim is to identify these determinants and assess the extent of port decarbonisation implementation worldwide. Using the implementation and diffusion of innovation theories, seven determinants were identified: policy and management tools, governance, managerial attitudes, interorganizational relationships, capacities and economic conditions, complexity and size, while additional controls related to port ownership and container specialisation were also considered. Data from 223 global ports were analyzed using multiple regression, and the findings confirm the importance of these determinants, revealing that while ports have knowledge and plans, their implementation of decarbonisation measures remains limited. Most ports are still in the early stages, showing significant gaps in achieving decarbonisation targets, which indicates a need for a more systematic approach. This study provides valuable insights for port managers and policymakers, helping them understand the factors that facilitate or hinder decarbonisation efforts, while offering guidance on prioritizing actions, making informed decisions, and developing effective strategies. By being the first to address port decarbonisation through this lens, the study extends the application of implementation and diffusion of innovation theories, and its findings contribute to advancing port decarbonisation by identifying key determinants and offering a clearer path toward successful implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Saved by the snowy owl: An intersectional analysis of indigenous rights and biodiversity in the Kvalsund wind power project in Norway","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103758","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103758","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent literature on energy justice highlights the need for intersectional considerations in energy decisions. This article addresses this research gap by presenting an intersectional analysis of a rejected wind power application in Northern Norway. By employing critical discourse analysis of the primary documents in the process, such as the wind power application, impact assessments, correspondences and the main decision letter, the paper examines the participation and influence of indigenous and biodiversity interests in the outcome of the wind power application. It presents three key findings relevant to energy justice theory. Firstly, energy regulators can make critical decisions to prioritise non-human considerations amidst competing interests of energy security, climate action and financial gains by establishing a threshold that may not be crossed regarding biodiversity conservation. Second, while indigenous participation is engraved in the Norwegian wind power licensing process, substantive contributions from institutions representing indigenous interests do not attract commensurate attention from energy regulators, highlighting the need for transformative measures to overcome structural bias. Third, the paper emphasises that energy regulators may demonstrate sensitivity to the local political context, employing strategic use of ambiguous language in their decisions. The article argues for more clarity and transparency in energy decisions regarding the intersectional consideration of indigenous rights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003499/pdfft?md5=5b681461965dc5088cb9648f0bbcd68e&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003499-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What do we know about the effectiveness of local energy plans? A systematic review of the research","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103767","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103767","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local energy planning is increasingly promoted as pivotal to decarbonising energy. However, widespread interest has not been matched by examination of whether plans achieve positive outcomes in practice. Nor is it clear whether the research surrounding local energy planning is useful in understanding and enhancing efficacy. To address these gaps, this paper systematically reviews research into local energy planning, using multiple search terms and content analysis of 182 items, applying analytical categories derived from planning theory. Results show a literature dominated by development of analytical tools, mobilising planning theories of ‘technocratic rationality’, but limited evidence of these tools being used in plan-making. By comparison, our review found relatively modest research interest in stakeholder engagement, negligible analysis of plan outcomes, and minimal critical analysis of implementation challenges. These findings can be treated as an indicator of research deficit, but also as <em>reflective of</em> local energy planning ‘realities’, in which plan-making is voluntaristic, implementation is patchy, and most effort is directed towards municipalities' own energy practices. Consequently, local energy planning and research have rarely driven the more challenging decarbonisation actions that might prompt critiques which could generate a broadening of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Future research agendas need to escape the confines of single loop learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}