Mattias Sjöberg, Paul J. Taylor, Stacey M. Conchie
{"title":"Matching your way to Success: The Influence of Motivational Frame Matching on Interaction Outcomes and Reciprocal Matching","authors":"Mattias Sjöberg, Paul J. Taylor, Stacey M. Conchie","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Theories of interpersonal sensemaking postulate that positive interactions emerge in interactions where speakers match on motivational frames. Across three experiments (<i>N = </i>1609) using a hypothetical simulation framework, we provide the first evidence of a causal link between motivational frame matching and positive interaction outcomes in three intelligence-gathering contexts. In all experiments, participants actively responded through instrumental, relational or identity motivational frames towards an investigative interviewer, rival sports supporter or HR representative, who did (did not) match them back. Results showed that within a competitive interaction, motivational frame matching consistently led to more positive interaction outcomes. Within a cooperative interaction, motivational frame matching led to more positive interaction outcomes for all measured variables (in the investigative interview) and greater feelings of being understood and a higher willingness to identify with the rival supporter, with limited positive effects in the HR interview. In all experiments, participants displayed more reciprocal matching when interacting with a matching versus a nonmatching interaction partner, and this translated into increased information provision in an adapted trust game where participants could send information in exchange for money.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"225-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70039","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146223909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Davide Morselli, Kevin Durrheim, Maite Beramendi, Melody Sepahpour-Fard, Martin Mafunda, Andres Martinez Torres, Nnaemeka Ohamadike, Mike Quayle, Maria Schuld
{"title":"Alignment and Differentiation: How Language and Network Proximity Drive Opinion-Based Group Formation Online","authors":"Davide Morselli, Kevin Durrheim, Maite Beramendi, Melody Sepahpour-Fard, Martin Mafunda, Andres Martinez Torres, Nnaemeka Ohamadike, Mike Quayle, Maria Schuld","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the interplay between language and social connectedness in forming opinion-based groups on social media. Drawing on small-world theory and social identity theory, we propose a dual-layer approach that combines semantic and network analysis to investigate the dynamics of group formation on X/Twitter during the 2021 COVID-19 vaccination campaign in South Africa. Our findings reveal a nuanced process of social sorting, where users actively align with like-minded individuals and differentiate from opposing viewpoints, shaping the formation of distinct online communities. Although a weak correlation exists between network distance and semantic similarity, our parallel examination highlights a clear trend of clustering around shared opinions. Notably, we find evidence that distance and proximity are not opposites but qualitatively different social psychological processes. Language becomes a more prominent marker of group membership over time, especially among pro-vaccination users. This suggests a dynamic process where opinion alignment is solidified through linguistic differentiation. Such sorting mechanism leads to the creation of social barriers and group boundaries. Our findings underscore the necessity of considering both structural and symbolic aspects in understanding the complex dynamics of opinion-based groups on social media. We propose a multilayer design to understand how individuals sort themselves and others within the complexities of online information flows. This approach unveils how people align with and differentiate from others, shaping the formation of opinion-based groups on social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"210-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Axel Chemke-Dreyfus, Charlie Crimston, Hema Preya Selvanathan, Jolanda Jetten
{"title":"Men's Allyship for Workplace Gender Equality: The Roles of Argument Framing and Perceived Motivation in Shaping Opinions","authors":"Axel Chemke-Dreyfus, Charlie Crimston, Hema Preya Selvanathan, Jolanda Jetten","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This research examines how different argument frames—moral, economic, and interpersonal ties—shape evaluations of men's support for workplace gender equality. Across three studies in Australia (<i>N</i> = 1006), both men and women rated argument persuasiveness and assessed the motivations of men's allyship supporting workplace gender equality. Study 1 used conceptual content analysis to identify common argument frames; Studies 2 and 3 experimentally tested their effects. Men found interpersonal ties arguments more persuasive than moral ones, but no more persuasive than economic arguments. Women, by contrast, evaluated persuasiveness based on their perceptions of men's motivations, leading to a different and more complex pattern of responses. These findings underscore the importance of both argument framing and perceived ally motivation in shaping responses to workplace gender equality messaging aimed at men by men.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"190-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patrick F. Kotzur, Alexandra Bruns, Ulrich Wagner, Maarten H. W. van Zalk
{"title":"Intergroup Contact With Refugees Shapes Levels of Social Fear of Crime","authors":"Patrick F. Kotzur, Alexandra Bruns, Ulrich Wagner, Maarten H. W. van Zalk","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intergroup contact affects how people see the world more broadly. Across four studies (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 1,743), we tested whether valenced intergroup contact with refugees as a criminally stigmatized group affects social fear of crime mediated by prejudice. Studies 1 (cross-sectional) and 2 (longitudinal) showed an indirect effect of positive contact on social fear of crime via reduced prejudice and an opposite indirect effect of negative contact. Studies 3–4 (experiments) provided a causal test of our prediction. Study 3's mediation results were non-significant. Study 4's were and showed that positive contact effects on social fear of crime were mediated via crime-related prejudice towards refugees, a highly criminally stigmatized group, yet not via crime-related prejudice towards homosexual people, a less criminally stigmatized group. We contributed by providing the first causal evidence that positive contact is an intervention strategy to reduce social fear of crime and expand the growing literature on transfer effects of intergroup contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"176-189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146217289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How Do Citizens Respond to Government Measures in Times of Crisis? Narrative Meaning-Making of Agency, Responsibility, and Compliance During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ecuador","authors":"Ella Marie Sandbakken","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Citizens’ responses to policies depend on narrative meaning-making. Through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuador, this study addresses calls for increased insights into how processes of responding to government measures function during societal crises and ruptures. I propose <i>multilevel narrative engagement</i> as a conceptual tool for understanding how citizens navigate narratives from global, national, community, and interpersonal levels when responding to crisis policies. Through an empirical investigation, I find that Ecuadorian interview participants used a <i>protection narrative</i>, an <i>informed choice narrative</i>, and an <i>injustice narrative</i> when making meaning of the government's COVID-19 measures, depending on their multilevel narrative engagement. Through these narratives, the agency and responsibility of citizens and authorities to manage the crisis were interpreted differently, leading to distinct perceptions of non-compliance and the legitimacy of the measures. Insights from the study can inform future crisis management that depends on how citizens react to crisis mitigation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"160-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judgements of Propaganda Near and Far: National Identity and Media Evaluations","authors":"Rebecca J. Dunk, Ronda F. Lo, Raymond A. Mar","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Western media often critiques foreign governments for their propaganda efforts while ignoring similar efforts by their own government. We predicted that individuals would demonstrate a similar bias. An experiment with 282 Canadian participants revealed just the opposite: when asked overtly, participants judged a video attributed to their own government to be more like propaganda than identical foreign media. When asked covertly (e.g., about the video's bias), we observed no effect, and national identity was not a moderator for Canadians. In a direct replication, Americans (<i>N</i> = 457) also judged domestic videos as more like propaganda than foreign ones, whether perceptions of propaganda were measured overtly or covertly. This difference was especially true of those lower and average in national identity, compared to those higher. A follow-up study demonstrated that Americans (<i>N</i> = 380) who are left-leaning are more likely to show this bias against domestic media, compared to those who are centrist or right-leaning. These studies demonstrate that people can be more critical of their own government's messaging relative to the same messaging by a foreign power, the opposite of holding a self-serving double standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"147-159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pauline Grippa, Paul Bertin, Olivier Klein, Laurent Licata
{"title":"Allies or Rivals? The Consequences of Ideological Distinctiveness and Social Recognition of Emergent Subgroups Within Social Movements","authors":"Pauline Grippa, Paul Bertin, Olivier Klein, Laurent Licata","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Conflictual dynamics within social movements are an important factor impeding social change. These conflicts may be explained by the negative reactions of members of dominant subgroups within these movements to emergent subgroups that are ideologically distinct from them and that attract social recognition. In two pre-registered experiments (<i>N</i> = 2060), we examined how these characteristics—and their interaction—influence attitudes and cooperation intentions among members of the dominant subgroup and whether perceived competition over prototypicality and symbolic threat mediate these effects. Across both studies, when an emergent subgroup was perceived as ideologically distinct, it led to negative intergroup relations through both the perception of competition over prototypicality and symbolic threat. In contrast, perceiving a subgroup as attracting social recognition generally fostered positive intergroup relations, despite also heightening perception of competition over prototypicality. In addition, Study 2 showed that attracting social recognition surprisingly reduced the perception of symbolic threat, leading to more positive reactions. We discuss the nature of conflicts within social movements and potential mitigation strategies.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"131-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146216829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul Bertin, Elisa Tognon, Kenzo Nera, Rrita Bajraktari, Pit Klein, Vincent Yzerbyt, Olivier Klein
{"title":"The Impact of Freedom of Speech on Conspiracy Beliefs","authors":"Paul Bertin, Elisa Tognon, Kenzo Nera, Rrita Bajraktari, Pit Klein, Vincent Yzerbyt, Olivier Klein","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conspiracy beliefs are often portrayed as a threat to democracies. However, less is known about the extent to which the state of democracy may affect conspiracy beliefs. Hence, we investigated the impact of the societal level of freedom of speech on conspiracy beliefs. In Study 1, using aggregated nation-level data (<i>N =</i> 68 countries), we found that conspiracy beliefs were higher in countries with lower population support for and lower expert-estimated freedom of speech. However, this effect was no longer significant after controlling for two confounders: corruption and electoral democracy. In Study 2a (<i>N =</i> 190, preregistered), inducing low (vs. high) freedom of speech increased conspiracy beliefs in a fictional society. We replicated this effect in Study 2b (<i>N =</i> 90, preregistered), extending it to generic conspiracy beliefs. In Study 3a (<i>N =</i> 436, preregistered), we successfully designed a new induction of freedom of speech in an ecological setting but failed to replicate its effect on conspiracy beliefs. We adjusted this new experimental material in Study 3b (<i>N =</i> 498, preregistered) and observed higher conspiracy beliefs under low freedom of speech, compared to the high freedom of speech and control conditions, which did not differ. Hence, the effect stemmed from low freedom of speech increasing conspiracy beliefs, rather than high freedom of speech reducing them. In Studies 2–3, the effect of freedom of speech remained significant when controlling for perceptions of democracy, highlighting the unique nature of this societal factor in shaping conspiracy beliefs. We discuss freedom of speech as a way to mitigate conspiracy beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"115-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Patriotism Longitudinally Predicts Symbolic Projection of Indigenous Culture Yet Undermines Recognition of Historical Injustices","authors":"Zoe Bertenshaw, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although Indigenous culture can help settler colonies positively distinguish themselves from other nations, unjust colonial histories can undermine national esteem. Patriotism among settler colonisers should therefore discourage marginalising Indigenous culture (low symbolic exclusion) yet encourage denying the contemporary relevance of colonial injustices (high historical negation). Using a random intercepts cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), we test the within-person effects of both patriotism and nationalism on symbolic exclusion and historical negation over 9 years among a nationwide sample of New Zealand Europeans (<i>N </i>= 22,547). As hypothesised, patriotism (but not nationalism) uniquely predicted within-person decreases in symbolic exclusion and increases in historical negation over time. Results replicated when (a) excluding nationalism and (b) examining patriotism's impact on symbolic- and resource-based policy opposition. Thus, patriotism among settler colonisers simultaneously motivates the symbolic projection of Indigenous culture and the denial of the enduring impact of colonial injustices. These insights help explain why some settler colonisers display tokenistic (anti-)bicultural beliefs.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"101-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146224558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thekla Morgenroth, they, them, Kira Kay Means, she, her
{"title":"Reviewing Research on Transgender and Nonbinary People in Social Psychology: Insights and Future Research Directions","authors":"Thekla Morgenroth, they, them, Kira Kay Means, she, her","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.70027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) identities and issues faced by TGNB people are receiving growing attention in social psychology. At the same time, this is a relatively new area, and most research on LGBTQ+ issues primarily focuses on sexual minorities, whereas most research on gender focuses on women and men. We provide an overview of the social psychological literature on TGNB issues specifically and discuss gaps in the literature that can serve as a springboard for future research. A systematic search identified 48 articles spanning five research themes: stereotyping and prejudice, experiences of stigma and affirmation, support and allyship, physical androgyny and measurements and methods. We summarize findings from these articles and point out future directions that can help enhance social psychology's contributions to solutions for the issues faced by TGNB people in today's highly polarized world.</p>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.70027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}