Cognitive Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Learning Partial Word Meanings From Referentially Ambiguous Naming Events 从指称歧义命名事件中学习部分词义
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70104
Nina Schoener, Sara C. Johnson, Sumarga H. Suanda
{"title":"Learning Partial Word Meanings From Referentially Ambiguous Naming Events","authors":"Nina Schoener,&nbsp;Sara C. Johnson,&nbsp;Sumarga H. Suanda","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70104","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Both classic thought experiments and recent empirical evidence suggest that children frequently encounter new words whose meanings are underdetermined by the extralinguistic contexts in which they occur. The role that these referentially ambiguous events play in children's word learning is central to ongoing debates in the field. Do children learn words from referentially ambiguous events via an incremental learning process? Or, do children learn words primarily from the rare referentially transparent events they experience? Across two experiments with adults as model word learners, the current work asks whether the answer to these questions depends in part on how word learning is assessed. Participants were asked to learn the meanings of novel words solely from their referentially ambiguous contexts. When learning was assessed by asking participants to identify the exact meanings of those novel words, participants struggled mightily. However, when learning was assessed by asking the same participants to identify which of two new contexts the novel word most likely occurred in, even those who failed the exact meaning assessment succeeded. These data suggest that although referentially ambiguous events may fall short in allowing learners to identify a word's exact meaning, they nevertheless lead learners into the right regions of semantic space. These findings are a reminder of the pervasiveness of partial word learning effects in vocabulary acquisition and highlight that the resolution to the debate over the role of referentially ambiguous events in learning may depend on how learning is defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144832626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seeking the Category: The Pragmatic Function of Formal Explanations and the Role of Cognitive Reflection 寻找范畴:形式解释的语用功能与认知反思的作用
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70101
Ivan Aslanov, Alexey Kotov, Ernesto Guerra, Alina Fedoriaieva, Tatyana Kotova
{"title":"Seeking the Category: The Pragmatic Function of Formal Explanations and the Role of Cognitive Reflection","authors":"Ivan Aslanov,&nbsp;Alexey Kotov,&nbsp;Ernesto Guerra,&nbsp;Alina Fedoriaieva,&nbsp;Tatyana Kotova","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70101","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Formal explanations are statements that explain properties of an object by referring to its category. This study investigates the role of pragmatics in the evaluation of formal explanations. Across six experiments, we examined how a questioner's knowledge of category identity and an explanation's capability to specify a category affect satisfaction with such explanations. Experiments 1a and 1b demonstrate that participants find formal explanations less satisfactory when the questioner is already aware of the category identity. Experiments 2a and 2b show that participants assumed a questioner was unaware of an object's category if they were satisfied with the formal explanation. In Experiment 3, open-ended responses revealed that satisfied questioners were perceived as seeking to learn a category identity, while dissatisfied ones were assumed to have other motives. Finally, Experiment 4 compares tautological formal explanations (where a label points to all categories possessing a particular feature at once) and nontautological ones (where a label points to one of several competing categories), and examines the role of cognitive reflection in their evaluation. It demonstrates that people with high cognitive reflection are more sensitive to pragmatic context and value a formal explanation more if it can identify a specific category. This study shows that formal explanations are satisfactory when they fulfill a specific pragmatic function, namely, helping to define a category when the questioner knows only its feature. It also shows that people prone to automatic intuitive responses are less likely to consider this function and tend to evaluate formal explanations independently of this part of the pragmatic context.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144832557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deliberation in Guesstimation 猜测中的深思熟虑
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70090
Vildan Salikutluk, Frank Jäkel
{"title":"Deliberation in Guesstimation","authors":"Vildan Salikutluk,&nbsp;Frank Jäkel","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70090","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In many real-world settings, people often have to make judgments with incomplete information. Estimating unknown quantities without using precise quantitative modeling and data is called guesstimation, which is often needed in forecasting settings. Furthermore, research in education found that solving guesstimation problems builds general problem-solving skills. In this paper, we present an empirical investigation on how people solve guesstimation problems. We study their problem-solving behavior with think-aloud methods, and we identify solution strategies that are frequently used. In a two-response paradigm, we first ask for gut-feeling answers to guesstimation questions and then allow deliberation before a second answer is given. Comparing the quality of these two answers reveals that deliberation improves the answer quality significantly. In a second experiment, we additionally elicit participants' confidence about their deliberated answers by asking for an entire distribution instead of just a point estimate. We find that participants are generally overconfident in their answers. We discuss guesstimation tasks as suitable test-beds for studying human deliberative judgments in general and in the more specific context of improving forecasting through appropriate artificial intelligence tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70090","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144833083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Inevitable and Unpredictable Role of Large Language Models in Education: A Commentary on Huettig and Christiansen (2024) 大型语言模型在教育中的不可避免和不可预测的作用——评休蒂格和克里斯蒂安森(2024)
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70105
Ernesto Guerra, Marcela Peña, Roberto Araya
{"title":"The Inevitable and Unpredictable Role of Large Language Models in Education: A Commentary on Huettig and Christiansen (2024)","authors":"Ernesto Guerra,&nbsp;Marcela Peña,&nbsp;Roberto Araya","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70105","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary critically complements a recent proposal that cognitive science can leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to counter declining literacy. While recognizing the educational potential of LLMs, we highlight a significant trade-off: their inherent design reduces users’ direct engagement with written text, undermining deeper literacy skills, especially in young learners. Acknowledging this tension is essential for developing pedagogically sound interventions. Cognitive scientists and educators must jointly anticipate which cognitive capacities may weaken, identify critical skills needed in emerging multimodal contexts, and collaboratively devise instructional strategies to preserve the cognitive benefits humans derive specifically from sustained interaction with written language.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144832866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Speech Disfluencies and Hand Gestures as Metacognitive Cues 言语不流利和手势作为元认知线索
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70093
Begüm Yılmaz, Reyhan Furman, Tilbe Göksun, Terry Eskenazi
{"title":"Speech Disfluencies and Hand Gestures as Metacognitive Cues","authors":"Begüm Yılmaz,&nbsp;Reyhan Furman,&nbsp;Tilbe Göksun,&nbsp;Terry Eskenazi","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70093","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How language interacts with metacognitive processes is an understudied area. Earlier research shows that people produce disfluencies (i.e., “<i>uh</i>” s or “<i>um</i>” s) in their speech when they are not sure of their answers, indicating metacognitive monitoring. Gestures have monitoring and predictive roles in language, also implicating metacognitive processes. Further, the rate of speech disfluencies and gestures change as a function of the communicational setting. People produce fewer disfluencies and more gestures when they can see the listener than when the listener is not visible. In the current study, 50 participants (32 women, <i>Mage</i> = 21.16, <i>SD</i> = 1.46) were asked 40 general knowledge questions, either with a visible (<i>n</i> = 25) or nonvisible (<i>n</i> = 25) listener. They provided feelings-of-knowing (FOK) judgment immediately after seeing the question and were asked to think aloud while pondering their answers. Then, they provided retrospective confidence judgments (RCJs). Results showed that gestures and speech disfluencies were not related either to the accuracy or the FOK judgments. However, both gestures and speech disfluencies predicted RCJs uniquely and interactively. Speech disfluencies negatively predicted RCJs. In contrast, hand gestures were positively related to RCJs. Importantly, the use of gestures was more strongly related to RCJs when disfluencies were also higher. No effect of communicational setting on the rate of gestures or speech disfluencies was found. These results highlight the importance of multimodal language cues in the elaboration of metacognitive judgments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seeking Meaning: Incorporating Linguistic Information in Cross-Situational Verb Learning 寻找意义:跨情景动词学习中的语言信息整合
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70099
Chi-hsin Chen, Yayun Zhang, Chen Yu
{"title":"Seeking Meaning: Incorporating Linguistic Information in Cross-Situational Verb Learning","authors":"Chi-hsin Chen,&nbsp;Yayun Zhang,&nbsp;Chen Yu","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning the meaning of a verb is challenging because learners need to resolve two types of ambiguity: (1) word-referent mapping—finding the correct referent event of a verb, and (2) word-meaning mapping—inferring the correct meaning of the verb from the referent event (e.g., whether the meaning of an action word is TURNING or TWISTING). The present work examines how adult learners solve this challenge by utilizing both in-the-moment linguistic information within individual learning situations and cross-situational statistical information across multiple learning situations. We investigate how different cues provided in the moment affect information selection and how cross-situational learning as a general computational mechanism allows for information integration over time. Two experiments were designed based on a Human Simulation Paradigm, in which adult learners were presented with a sequence of short videos from parent−toddler toy play and asked to guess a mystery verb the parent produced in each video. In Experiment 1, we compared individual learning situations containing linguistic information to the exact same learning scenes without linguistic information and found that linguistic information helped learners narrow down the meaning of a verb embedded in individual situations, which was consistent with prior research. In Experiment 2, the videos sharing the same target verb were presented in a blocked design to incorporate cross-situational statistics for the same verb. We measured the variability, convergence, and accuracy of participants’ guesses. Within-trial linguistic information allowed learners to quickly narrow down their search space and focus on a few relevant aspects in a scene, while cross-situational learning allowed them to fine-tune their learning further across trials. Our findings support a unified account wherein within-trial linguistic information and cross-situational statistical information are integrated for more efficient verb learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Children Show More Selective Cognitive Offloading After First Being Compelled to Offload Indiscriminately 在第一次被强迫不加选择地卸载后,儿童表现出更多的选择性认知卸载
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70100
Kristy L. Armitage, Alicia K. Jones, Jonathan Redshaw
{"title":"Children Show More Selective Cognitive Offloading After First Being Compelled to Offload Indiscriminately","authors":"Kristy L. Armitage,&nbsp;Alicia K. Jones,&nbsp;Jonathan Redshaw","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70100","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the rise of wearable technologies, mobile devices and artificial intelligence comes a growing pressure to understand downstream effects of cognitive offloading on children's future thinking and behavior. Here, we explored whether compelling children to use an indiscriminate cognitive offloading strategy affects their subsequent strategy selection. Six- to 9-year-olds (<i>N</i> = 128) completed a task where manual rotation of stimuli sometimes offloaded mental rotation demand and other times did not. In phase 1, some children were compelled to use manual rotation indiscriminately, whereas others could only use mental rotation. In phase 2, where children could freely choose their strategy, older children who were compelled to use manual rotation in phase 1 were significantly more selective in their strategy use, rotating the stimuli relatively more frequently when this behavior would offload cognitive demand than when it would not. These results provide preliminary evidence that pre-exposure to indiscriminate cognitive offloading can promote selectivity in children's subsequent strategy use, though this selectivity may reflect a desire to avoid cognitive effort rather than improve task performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Water Is and Is Not H2O, Depending on Who You Ask: Conceptualizations of Water Vary Across Chemists and Laypeople 水是和不是H2O,取决于你问谁:化学家和外行人对水的概念各不相同
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70094
Claudia Mazzuca, Marta Arcovito, Ilenia Falcinelli, Chiara Fini, Anna M. Borghi
{"title":"Water Is and Is Not H2O, Depending on Who You Ask: Conceptualizations of Water Vary Across Chemists and Laypeople","authors":"Claudia Mazzuca,&nbsp;Marta Arcovito,&nbsp;Ilenia Falcinelli,&nbsp;Chiara Fini,&nbsp;Anna M. Borghi","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conceptual representations can be shaped by multiple factors, including expertise. In this study, we tested whether the concept of water is represented differently across laypeople and chemists, focusing on psychological essentialism. Essentialized categories are thought to be determined by internal factors (e.g., chemical composition). Previous research suggests laypeople do not essentialize “water.” Here, we sought to verify whether extensive experience with chemicals might lead to more essentialist conceptions. In the first two experiments, participants provided H<sub>2</sub>O estimates, typicality, centrality, and frequency ratings for water examples, which showed that chemists partially incorporate H<sub>2</sub>O in their conceptual representation of “water.” Experiment 3 underlined qualitative differences in the semantic organization of “water” across the two groups using similarity ratings. Experiment 4 consolidated these results with a sentence acceptability task, underlying the importance of chemical composition in determining what counts as “water” for chemists. Finally, Experiment 5 showed that laypeople consider both “H<sub>2</sub>O” and “water” as more abstract compared to chemists. Our results provide evidence on the variability of both psychological essentialism and conceptual representation overall, which can vary as a function of expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Iconic Words Are Associated With Iconic Gestures 标志性的词语与标志性的手势相关联
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70098
Ell Wilding, Bodo Winter, Jeannette Littlemore, Marcus Perlman
{"title":"Iconic Words Are Associated With Iconic Gestures","authors":"Ell Wilding,&nbsp;Bodo Winter,&nbsp;Jeannette Littlemore,&nbsp;Marcus Perlman","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70098","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Iconicity ratings studies have established that there are many English words which native speakers judge as “iconic,” that is, as sounding like what they mean. Here, we explore whether these iconic English words are more likely to be accompanied by iconic gestures. We report a large-scale quantitative study comparing the gesture rate of words rated as high in iconicity (e.g., <i>swoosh</i>, <i>puffy</i>, <i>crispy</i>) to those rated as low in iconicity (e.g., <i>ordain</i>, <i>rejoin</i>, <i>grateful</i>), balancing for perceptual strength, part-of-speech, and syllable length. Five thousand seven hundred and twenty-five tokens from the TV News Archive were coded for whether speakers produced a gesture with the word, and whether the gesture was iconic. The results show that high iconicity words have a higher overall gesture rate (69%) than low iconicity words (56%): specifically, high iconicity words have a higher <i>iconic</i> gesture rate (24% vs. 11%). This effect is more pronounced among verbs than adjectives, which we hypothesize may be due to the dynamic nature of verbs. We also find that this result persists when controlling for perceptual and action strength ratings, suggesting that word-level iconicity is a more important predictor than sensorimotor strength of whether a speaker will use an iconic gesture. We find that some high iconicity words are more likely to occur with iconic gestures when they come with markers of syntactic isolation, suggesting that morphosyntactic behavior is also relevant to iconic gesture production. Our findings demonstrate that iconicity in spoken communication is inherently multimodal, manifesting in both speech and gesture simultaneously, and that iconicity is often psychologically active when speakers use conventionalized iconic words.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Mind-Reading Involved in Ownership Judgments? 读心术是否涉及所有权判断?
IF 2.4 2区 心理学
Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/cogs.70097
Réka Blazsek, Christophe Heintz
{"title":"Is Mind-Reading Involved in Ownership Judgments?","authors":"Réka Blazsek,&nbsp;Christophe Heintz","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70097","url":null,"abstract":"<p>How do people determine who owns what? While existing research has identified a number of psychological and behavioral sources of ownership judgments, the role of mental state attribution has received less attention. We conducted three online experiments (<i>N</i> = 1246) examining if ownership judgments rely on mind-reading: the capacity to infer others’ intentions, beliefs, and knowledge states. Using vignettes, we tested if ownership judgments are sensitive to variations in contextual cues (Study 1), beliefs about the permissibility of taking items (Study 2), and knowledge about social norms (Study 3). We also tested if the moral aspects of a scenario affect judgments of rightful ownership transfer. Our findings indicate that ownership judgments indeed vary in response to these factors, and that they do not vary on par with moral judgments. These findings are best explained in terms of mind-reading and support the argument that ownership is fundamentally a social phenomenon: not a relationship between people and resources but rather between people about resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.70097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144773791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信