Clockwise Bias in 2D Rotation: A Cognitive Rather Than Sensory Phenomenon

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Rong Jiang, Ruo-Si Li, Ming Meng
{"title":"Clockwise Bias in 2D Rotation: A Cognitive Rather Than Sensory Phenomenon","authors":"Rong Jiang,&nbsp;Ruo-Si Li,&nbsp;Ming Meng","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous studies have documented a preference for clockwise (CW) over counterclockwise (CCW) rotation in various visual tasks, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To determine at what stage the CW bias emerges, we tested this preference across multiple visual awareness paradigms using consistent 2D rotation stimuli. In Experiment 1, we found a strong CW bias in apparent motion, with CW dominating perception 1.6 times longer than CCW during long-term presentations and eliciting an average of 74% CW percepts in short-term presentations. By contrast, no CW bias was observed in binocular rivalry, suggesting its absence in low-level perceptual conflict. Experiment 2 employed the breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS) paradigm to assess unconscious preferences, revealing no difference in breakthrough times between CW and CCW rotations. Specifically, although apparent motion stimuli showed a higher frequency of CW percepts, breakthrough times for stimuli reported as CW and CCW were similar, indicating that the CW bias occurs after stimuli reach awareness. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the ambiguity of apparent motion stimuli and found significant interactions between the CW bias and input ambiguity, further ruling out a fixed sensory or response bias. These findings suggest that the CW bias in 2D rotation may be driven by higher-level cognitive processes, offering insights into how the visual system resolves perceptual ambiguity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"49 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have documented a preference for clockwise (CW) over counterclockwise (CCW) rotation in various visual tasks, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To determine at what stage the CW bias emerges, we tested this preference across multiple visual awareness paradigms using consistent 2D rotation stimuli. In Experiment 1, we found a strong CW bias in apparent motion, with CW dominating perception 1.6 times longer than CCW during long-term presentations and eliciting an average of 74% CW percepts in short-term presentations. By contrast, no CW bias was observed in binocular rivalry, suggesting its absence in low-level perceptual conflict. Experiment 2 employed the breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS) paradigm to assess unconscious preferences, revealing no difference in breakthrough times between CW and CCW rotations. Specifically, although apparent motion stimuli showed a higher frequency of CW percepts, breakthrough times for stimuli reported as CW and CCW were similar, indicating that the CW bias occurs after stimuli reach awareness. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the ambiguity of apparent motion stimuli and found significant interactions between the CW bias and input ambiguity, further ruling out a fixed sensory or response bias. These findings suggest that the CW bias in 2D rotation may be driven by higher-level cognitive processes, offering insights into how the visual system resolves perceptual ambiguity.

二维旋转中的顺时针偏差:一种认知现象而非感觉现象
先前的研究已经记录了在各种视觉任务中顺时针旋转比逆时针旋转的偏好,但潜在的机制尚不清楚。为了确定连续视觉偏差在哪个阶段出现,我们使用一致的二维旋转刺激在多个视觉意识范式中测试了这种偏好。在实验1中,我们发现在视运动中存在强烈的连续波偏倚,在长时间演示中,连续波支配知觉的时间是常规波支配知觉的1.6倍,而在短时间演示中,平均诱导出74%的连续波知觉。相比之下,双眼竞争中没有观察到连续波偏倚,这表明它在低水平知觉冲突中不存在。实验2采用打破连续闪光抑制(b-CFS)范式来评估无意识偏好,结果显示连续闪光和连续闪光旋转在突破时间上没有差异。具体而言,尽管视运动刺激显示出更高的连续知觉频率,但连续知觉和连续知觉的突破时间相似,表明连续知觉偏差发生在刺激达到意识之后。在实验3中,我们对视运动刺激的模糊性进行了操纵,发现连续波偏差与输入模糊性之间存在显著的相互作用,进一步排除了固定的感觉或反应偏差。这些发现表明,二维旋转中的连续波偏差可能是由更高层次的认知过程驱动的,为视觉系统如何解决感知模糊提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信