Journal of Economic Psychology最新文献_第3页

Loss aversion is not robust: A re-meta-analysis 损失厌恶并不稳健：重新荟萃分析

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102801

Eldad Yechiam, Dana Zeif

引用次数: 0

Identified disclosure to increase Consumers’ detection of native advertising 识别信息披露，增加消费者对原生广告的发现

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102800

Dalia Shilian , Eyal Pe'er

引用次数: 0

Shaping societal norms: Experimental evidence on the normative impact of free speech law 塑造社会规范：关于言论自由法规范影响的实验证据

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102799

Daniel L. Chen , Susan Yeh

引用次数: 0

Purely hedonic image concerns and audience size: Evidence from a charity dictator game 纯粹的享乐形象和用户规模：来自慈善独裁者游戏的证据

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102798

Sem Manna , Alessandro Stringhi

引用次数: 0

Nudging: An experiment on transparency, accounting for reactance and response time 轻推：一个关于透明度的实验，考虑到电抗和反应时间

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102797

Tobias Schütze , Carsten Spitzer , Philipp C. Wichardt

引用次数: 0

Does future time reference framing increase temporal discounting? Evidence from English monolinguals 未来的时间参考框架会增加时间折扣吗？来自英语单语者的证据

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2025.102796

Josie I. Chen , Yue Han , Tai-Sen He

引用次数: 0

Visceral influences and gender difference in competitiveness 竞争力的内在影响与性别差异

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102788

Jingcheng Fu , Songfa Zhong

引用次数: 0

Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise? 线长的随机选择和不完美判断：隐藏在噪声中的是什么？

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102787

Sean Duffy , John Smith

{"title":"Stochastic choice and imperfect judgments of line lengths: What is hiding in the noise?","authors":"Sean Duffy , John Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2024.102787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joep.2024.102787","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Noise is a pervasive feature of economic choice. However, standard economics experiments are not well equipped to study the noise because experiments are constrained: preferences are often either unknown or only imperfectly measured by experimenters. As a result of these designs – where the optimal choice is not observable to the analyst – many important questions about the noise in apparently random choice cannot be addressed. There is a long tradition in psychology of studying settings where subjects make choices about objectively measurable, but imperfectly perceived objects. We simply supplement this design with material incentives in a way that resembles economic choice. In our design, subjects make incentivized binary choices between lines and are paid a function of the length of the selected line. We find a gradual (not sudden) relationship between the difference in the lengths of the lines and the optimal choice. Our analysis suggests that the errors are better described as having a Gumbel distribution rather than a normal distribution, and our simulated data increase our confidence in this inference. We find evidence that suboptimal choices are associated with longer response times than optimal choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143173693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From strong exceptions to parameter spaces: A précis to the special issue on meta-analyses in economic psychology 从强例外到参数空间：经济心理学的元分析专刊

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102784

Eldad Yechiam

引用次数: 0

Slipping on stereotypes – Interactive gender effects in the erosion of ethical behavior 在刻板印象上滑落——道德行为侵蚀中的交互式性别影响

IF 2.5 2区经济学

Journal of Economic Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2024.102785

Anja Bodenschatz , Gari Walkowitz

{"title":"Slipping on stereotypes – Interactive gender effects in the erosion of ethical behavior","authors":"Anja Bodenschatz , Gari Walkowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2024.102785","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.joep.2024.102785","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate how gender affects ethical outcomes in repeated same- or mixed-gender interactions. In our first study (<em>N</em> = 681), we use an experimental slippery-slope audit setting (Gino and Bazerman, 2009), in which an “auditor” makes an approval decision about the emerging unethical behavior of an “estimator” whose gender has been made salient. Based on previous evidence, unethical behavior is more likely to be accepted when it emerges gradually compared to a situation where it occurs abruptly. While we do not find a general slippery-slope effect across the whole sample, a significant slippery-slope effect is detected when the estimator is male (<em>d</em> = 0.36) or when the auditor is female (<em>d</em> = 0.27). We observe no slippery-slope effects in same-gender estimator-auditor constellations. However, in mixed-gender constellations, we find opposite effects: when male estimators are audited by females, we observe a significant slippery-slope effect (<em>d</em> = 0.53), driven by a high approval rate in the slippery-slope treatment. Conversely, when female estimators are audited by males, the approval rate increases in the abrupt treatment (<em>d</em> = 0.33). To better understand the drivers of these findings, we asked a different sample of participants (<em>N</em> = 90) to indicate the level of competence or honesty they attribute to male and female estimators in the estimation task. Responses suggest that the detected slippery-slope effects may be driven by auditors (especially females), attributing more competence to male estimators (<em>d</em> = 0.62), which is particularly relevant in the slippery-slope treatment where unethical behavior is difficult to detect. Moreover, our finding that male auditors are particularly inclined to approve overvaluations by females in the abrupt treatment, where unethical behavior becomes salient, may be driven by a more ethical assessment of female estimators (<em>d</em> = 0.90).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143173696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0