Current Opinion in Psychology最新文献_第2页

Conversational remembering 对话的记忆

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102177

Lucas M. Bietti

引用次数: 0

Public, politics, and climate scepticism 公众、政治和气候怀疑主义

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102176

Waqas Ejaz

引用次数: 0

AI & collective memory 人工智能与集体记忆

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102156

Andrew Hoskins

{"title":"AI & collective memory","authors":"Andrew Hoskins","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102156","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102156","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this review, I show how Generative AI (GAI) utterly transforms how we represent, access, expose and cover, find and lose, sanitise and toxify, use and abuse, and communicate with, the past.</div><div>The term ‘collective memory’ has become common parlance for an array of constructive and nefarious uses of the shared past. It is often seen as related to the lifespan of an individual, or a group or generation who lived through or experienced a particular era or event, affording some kind of shared experience that is strengthened by the presence of or connection to others in common. In this way, the collective, as with an individual's memory has its limits, it dies out.</div><div>However, particularly since the late twentieth century, the term has acquired a mythical form, with publics, institutions and scholars, imagining in its nature, function and extended duration, for a variety of ends. These imaginaries are often tied to assumptions around the unifying nature of the technologies and media of memory of the day.</div><div>I argue here that today's agentic turn by contrast offers no such prospects for collective memory, mythical or otherwise. Rather, Generative and Agentic AI's extracting, remixing and replaying of interactions, shards you and your identities anew, rendering it difficult to imagine a group, experience or event, around which a collective memory could cohere. Instead, individuals and societies are subject to a black box memory of impossible provenance, where human agency in shaping what the past becomes is in retreat.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102156"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145059820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Personality and cognitive ability: A critical review and meta-analytic synthesis 人格与认知能力：批判性回顾与元分析综合

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102171

Jeromy Anglim

引用次数: 0

Not distinctly harmless, but No distinct harms? 不是完全无害，但是没有明显的危害？

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102159

Austin Due

引用次数: 0

No one sees you quite like I do: The social relations model in personality perception 没人能像我一样看待你人格知觉中的社会关系模型

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102160

Vasiliki Kentrou, Jacek Buczny

{"title":"No one sees you quite like I do: The social relations model in personality perception","authors":"Vasiliki Kentrou, Jacek Buczny","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102160","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102160","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Social Relations Model (SRM) offers a comprehensive framework for examining how individuals perceive personality traits in others, decomposing personality perceptions into perceiver, target, and relationship effects. These components demonstrate meaningful variation across traits, time, classes of relationships, and levels of acquaintance. Nevertheless, while target and perceiver effects have been well-documented, the relationship effect, capturing idiosyncratic, dyad-specific personality perceptions, remains underexplored despite accounting for substantial variance and predicting meaningful outcomes. Relationship effects are likely shaped by multiple factors, including unique behaviors, unique interpretations by perceivers, unique situations, unique biases, or dyadic fit. Recent developments leading to the extended SRM (eSRM) further enrich the model by introducing the ability to capture individual-level variability in how perceivers utilize SRM components. Importantly, despite practical challenges, including the resource demands of round-robin designs and the statistical complexity of the model, technological and collaborative innovations grounded in open science practices offer pathways to broaden the application of the SRM. This review aims to position the SRM as an increasingly promising and accessible tool for the study of personality perception and to highlight that additional research utilizing the SRM is needed to advance our understanding of the causes and consequences of relationship effects in personality perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102160"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145009032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Adverse experiences in psychological treatments: Where do we stand? 心理治疗中的不良经历：我们站在哪里？

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102161

Bernhard Strauss, Jenny Rosendahl, Rahel Klatte

引用次数: 0

The reality of collective memory 集体记忆的现实

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102157

Jeffrey K. Olick

引用次数: 0

Collective remembering and imagining futures 集体记忆和想象未来

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102158

Sandra Obradović , Jovan Ivanović

{"title":"Collective remembering and imagining futures","authors":"Sandra Obradović , Jovan Ivanović","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102158","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102158","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review explores the intertwined psychological processes of collective remembering and imagining, emphasizing their shared roots in present-day uncertainty. We propose a multidirectional model of collective mental time travel, where the present acts as a catalyst for navigating both the past and future through culturally embedded narratives and symbolic resources. Drawing on recent interdisciplinary research, we argue that these processes are not linear but multilinear, shaped by social identities, historical contexts, and culturally specific worldviews of time. Collective remembering and imagining serve as mechanisms of meaning-making and self-regulation, enabling social groups to interpret uncertainty, foster agency, and mobilize for change. While nostalgia may anchor groups in idealized pasts, utopian visions can inspire transformative futures. However, the direction and impact of these temporal orientations vary across cultures and depend on how time is conceptualized. Our model highlights the feedback loop between temporal reflection and present-day action, showing how collective memory and imagination can either reinforce the status quo or catalyse social transformation. Ultimately, we advocate for a nuanced understanding of CMTT as a dynamic, socially situated process that plays a critical role in shaping collective agency and envisioning alternative futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102158"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145009035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Adverse effects of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy: A neglected but urgent area of inquiry 眼动脱敏和再加工治疗的不良反应：一个被忽视但迫切需要研究的领域

IF 6.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102155

Kevin van Schie , Suzanne C. van Veen

{"title":"Adverse effects of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing therapy: A neglected but urgent area of inquiry","authors":"Kevin van Schie , Suzanne C. van Veen","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102155","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102155","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is widely recognized as an effective treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), its safety profile remains underexamined. This review critically evaluates the extent to which adverse effects are reported and monitored in EMDR research. We analyzed 51 randomized controlled trials from recent meta-analyses on EMDR for PTSD and found that only nine studies mentioned adverse effects, with just one employing systematic assessment protocols. In five of the nine studies, patients did report adverse effects, typically mild and temporary, but these were often described anecdotally and without predefined criteria or structured monitoring. Drop-out is more consistently reported across trials, but it is not a reliable indicator of adverse effects per se. The lack of structured monitoring of adverse effects complicates interpretation of EMDR's risk–benefit profile and limits informed decision-making in clinical settings. We discuss potential reasons for the underreporting of adverse events. Moreover, as EMDR is increasingly applied beyond PTSD, little is known about its safety in populations with complex comorbidities or in non-PTSD conditions. We also consider potential cognitive risks, such as memory blurring and the subsequent risk of false memory creation, though recent evidence suggests these effects are not robust or clinically concerning. To advance ethical and methodologically sound EMDR research, we propose integrating standardized adverse effects monitoring, preregistration of harm criteria, and safety endpoints alongside efficacy outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102155"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145009034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0