人格与认知能力：批判性回顾与元分析综合

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102171

Jeromy Anglim

{"title":"人格与认知能力：批判性回顾与元分析综合","authors":"Jeromy Anglim","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper critically reviews research on the relationship between personality and cognitive ability. Findings are synthesized from two recent meta-analyses: Anglim et al. (2022, <em>Psychological Bulletin</em>) and Stanek & Ones (2023, <em>PNAS</em>). Stanek & Ones used a sample-size-weighted estimator, which excessively weighted a few large-sample studies and produced estimates that do not generalize. I reanalyzed their dataset with REML estimation, which better accounts for between-study variability and yields results more consistent with Anglim et al. Meta-analytic results are presented for broad traits (Big Five, HEXACO), facets, and cognitive domains (general, fluid, crystallized intelligence). Recent empirical studies (2022–2025) are reviewed, highlighting methodological and theoretical developments. Findings highlight progress in clarifying personality–intelligence relations and provide a foundation for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102171"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality and cognitive ability: A critical review and meta-analytic synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Jeromy Anglim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper critically reviews research on the relationship between personality and cognitive ability. Findings are synthesized from two recent meta-analyses: Anglim et al. (2022, <em>Psychological Bulletin</em>) and Stanek & Ones (2023, <em>PNAS</em>). Stanek & Ones used a sample-size-weighted estimator, which excessively weighted a few large-sample studies and produced estimates that do not generalize. I reanalyzed their dataset with REML estimation, which better accounts for between-study variability and yields results more consistent with Anglim et al. Meta-analytic results are presented for broad traits (Big Five, HEXACO), facets, and cognitive domains (general, fluid, crystallized intelligence). Recent empirical studies (2022–2025) are reviewed, highlighting methodological and theoretical developments. Findings highlight progress in clarifying personality–intelligence relations and provide a foundation for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对人格与认知能力关系的研究进行了综述。研究结果综合了最近的两项荟萃分析：Anglim等人（2022年，《心理学公报》）和Stanek & Ones（2023年，PNAS）。Stanek &； one使用了样本大小加权估计器，它过度加权了一些大样本研究，并产生了不能推广的估计。我用REML估计重新分析了他们的数据集，这更好地解释了研究之间的可变性，并得出了与Anglim等人更一致的结果。元分析结果提出了广泛的特征（大五，HEXACO），方面和认知领域（一般，流体，结晶智力）。回顾了最近的实证研究（2022-2025），突出了方法和理论的发展。研究结果表明，人格与智力关系的研究取得了新的进展，并为今后的研究奠定了基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Personality and cognitive ability: A critical review and meta-analytic synthesis

This paper critically reviews research on the relationship between personality and cognitive ability. Findings are synthesized from two recent meta-analyses: Anglim et al. (2022, Psychological Bulletin) and Stanek & Ones (2023, PNAS). Stanek & Ones used a sample-size-weighted estimator, which excessively weighted a few large-sample studies and produced estimates that do not generalize. I reanalyzed their dataset with REML estimation, which better accounts for between-study variability and yields results more consistent with Anglim et al. Meta-analytic results are presented for broad traits (Big Five, HEXACO), facets, and cognitive domains (general, fluid, crystallized intelligence). Recent empirical studies (2022–2025) are reviewed, highlighting methodological and theoretical developments. Findings highlight progress in clarifying personality–intelligence relations and provide a foundation for future research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

12.10

自引率

3.40%

发文量

293

审稿时长

53 days

期刊介绍： Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology