{"title":"No one sees you quite like I do: The social relations model in personality perception","authors":"Vasiliki Kentrou, Jacek Buczny","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Social Relations Model (SRM) offers a comprehensive framework for examining how individuals perceive personality traits in others, decomposing personality perceptions into perceiver, target, and relationship effects. These components demonstrate meaningful variation across traits, time, classes of relationships, and levels of acquaintance. Nevertheless, while target and perceiver effects have been well-documented, the relationship effect, capturing idiosyncratic, dyad-specific personality perceptions, remains underexplored despite accounting for substantial variance and predicting meaningful outcomes. Relationship effects are likely shaped by multiple factors, including unique behaviors, unique interpretations by perceivers, unique situations, unique biases, or dyadic fit. Recent developments leading to the extended SRM (eSRM) further enrich the model by introducing the ability to capture individual-level variability in how perceivers utilize SRM components. Importantly, despite practical challenges, including the resource demands of round-robin designs and the statistical complexity of the model, technological and collaborative innovations grounded in open science practices offer pathways to broaden the application of the SRM. This review aims to position the SRM as an increasingly promising and accessible tool for the study of personality perception and to highlight that additional research utilizing the SRM is needed to advance our understanding of the causes and consequences of relationship effects in personality perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102160"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Social Relations Model (SRM) offers a comprehensive framework for examining how individuals perceive personality traits in others, decomposing personality perceptions into perceiver, target, and relationship effects. These components demonstrate meaningful variation across traits, time, classes of relationships, and levels of acquaintance. Nevertheless, while target and perceiver effects have been well-documented, the relationship effect, capturing idiosyncratic, dyad-specific personality perceptions, remains underexplored despite accounting for substantial variance and predicting meaningful outcomes. Relationship effects are likely shaped by multiple factors, including unique behaviors, unique interpretations by perceivers, unique situations, unique biases, or dyadic fit. Recent developments leading to the extended SRM (eSRM) further enrich the model by introducing the ability to capture individual-level variability in how perceivers utilize SRM components. Importantly, despite practical challenges, including the resource demands of round-robin designs and the statistical complexity of the model, technological and collaborative innovations grounded in open science practices offer pathways to broaden the application of the SRM. This review aims to position the SRM as an increasingly promising and accessible tool for the study of personality perception and to highlight that additional research utilizing the SRM is needed to advance our understanding of the causes and consequences of relationship effects in personality perception.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology