Prevention Science最新文献

{"title":"Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.","authors":"Allison West, Diana Eldreth Chute, Jane Daniels, Kelly M Bower","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-engaged research (CEnR) has potential to advance early home visiting and improve health outcomes for all families by ensuring that research aligns with the needs of the community, methods and procedures are acceptable and accessible, and findings are interpreted accurately and disseminated effectively. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the extent and nature of CEnR in peer-reviewed literature relevant to early home visiting. We searched five scholarly databases for literature published since 2010 describing engagement of community members in research involving evidence-based early home visiting programs. We extracted data on each study's characteristics, community collaborators, and factors, outcomes, and measures of community engagement. We then coded each study for 16 community engagement components and characterized each study along an established continuum of CEnR. Fourteen articles met all eligibility criteria and were characterized as involving community consultation, community participation, or community-based participatory research. No articles were characterized as community initiated or driven. No studies assessed the impact of community engagement, and only two described barriers or facilitators to engagement. CEnR may be underutilized and underreported in peer-reviewed home visiting research. Findings highlight opportunities to build motivation and capacity for CEnR, transparency in CEnR reporting, and evaluation of CEnR process and impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Changing Developmental Patterns of Cannabis and Alcohol Use in Washington State: an Analysis of Young Adult Birth Cohorts Born in 1990-2004.","authors":"Jessica Acolin, Brian Calhoun, Isaac C Rhew, Charles B Fleming, Brittney Hultgren, Griselda Martinez, Jason R Kilmer, Mary Larimer, Katarina Guttmannova","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01813-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01813-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol and cannabis are the two most commonly used substances in young adulthood. Prior evidence shows that while risky alcohol use peaks in the mid-20 s and decreases by the end of young adulthood (i.e., \"maturing out\"), cannabis use prevalence decreases gradually across young adulthood. As the landscape of cannabis legalization in the USA evolves, it is critical to assess changes in young adult patterns of use. This study examined developmental patterns of young adult cannabis and alcohol use in Washington State (WA). Annual repeated cross-sectional survey data from 2015 to 2022 were collected from 15,371 young adults 18-25 living in WA. Logistic regression models examined changes in alcohol (any past month use, frequent use, heavy episodic drinking [HED]) and cannabis (any past month use, frequent use) by developmental age and birth cohort. Cannabis use prevalence was higher at age 21-22 compared to age 18-20, a departure from prior studies. In more recent birth cohorts, prevalence among 23-25-year-olds was lower than among 21-22-year-olds, suggesting an emerging pattern of maturing out. Additionally, there was a significant moderation of developmental patterns of risky (HED and frequent) alcohol use by birth cohort. As cannabis legalization continues to evolve, it is critical for programs to prioritize early prevention prior to and at age 21 to mitigate and prevent associated adverse health outcomes of cannabis use. Continued surveillance including older age groups is needed to characterize changing developmental patterns of young adult cannabis use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144162913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Psychosocial Correlates of Adherence to Mind-Body Interventions.","authors":"Elizabeth Jean Duraney, Madhura Phansikar, Ruchika Shaurya Prakash","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01810-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01810-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mind-body interventions involve practices that intentionally combine mental and physical fitness, showing promise for improving psychological and cognitive health in older adults. Limited research exists on adherence to these interventions and the demographic and psychosocial factors that may predict variability in compliance. In the current study, we identified key correlates-demographic, psychosocial, and cognitive-of adherence to two mind-body interventions. Baseline and intervention data were analyzed together from a randomized controlled trial of older adults who participated in two four-week mind-body interventions and completed practice logs (n = 60). Adherence was defined as the average weekly self-reported minutes of homework practice during the intervention. Baseline correlates included education, sex assigned at birth, working memory score, emotion dysregulation, positive and negative affect, trait mindfulness, and depression. Partial least squares regression was used to identify latent components. A significant one-component solution from the final model explained 23.08% of the variance in practice minutes. Greater adherence was associated with mild depressive symptoms, difficulties with emotion regulation, and lower working memory scores. These findings suggest that participants with mild emotional and cognitive difficulties may be more likely to adhere to mind-body interventions. These results emphasize the target population likely to engage in mind-body interventions and may be valuable for designing tailored interventions and developing strategies to maximize adherence. This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT03432754) on February 14, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143992473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Longitudinal Associations of Impulsivity, Sensation-Seeking, and Peer E-Cigarette Use on the Frequency of E-Cigarette Use Across Young Adulthood.","authors":"Caroline North, Keryn E Pasch, Miguel Pinedo, Anna V Wilkinson, Alexandra Loukas","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01811-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01811-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the associations of impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and peer electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use on longitudinal changes in ENDS use frequency across ages 19-29 years old. Data were drawn from a larger multi-wave study of college students in Texas. Participants were 1227 initially 19-25-year-old young adults who currently used ENDS at least once across six waves (baseline: fall 2015, final wave: spring 2019). At baseline, participants were 21.3 years old on average, 43.6% male, 35.5% non-Hispanic White, 32.5% Hispanic/Latino, 16.2% Asian, 6.7% Black, and 9.1% another racial/ethnic identity. Growth curve modeling with an accelerated longitudinal design was used to test direct and interactive associations of age, impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and peer ENDS use on ENDS use frequency across young adulthood, 19-29 years old. Findings indicated that the trajectory of ENDS use frequency increased with increasing age. Impulsivity, but not sensation-seeking, was associated with an increase in ENDS use frequency across increasing age. Impulsivity and sensation-seeking significantly interacted with peer ENDS use: those high in impulsivity or sensation-seeking used ENDS less frequently as they aged when they had fewer peers who use ENDS, and those high in sensation-seeking used ENDS more frequently when they had more peers who use ENDS. Peers play an important role for young adults with impulsivity and/or sensation-seeking-having few peers who use ENDS was protective of escalations in ENDS use, and having more peers who use ENDS increases the risk for escalations in ENDS use for those high in sensation-seeking only.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144004723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Healing of the Canoe: Preliminary Suicide Prevention Outcomes Among Participating and Non-Participating Youth.","authors":"Tamara Perkins, Brian Lee, Juliette Mackin, Dennis Donovan, Stephanie Craig Rushing, Colbie Caughlan, Amanda Gchachu Kakuska, Leanza Walker","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01806-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healing of the Canoe (HOC) is a community-derived, culturally grounded, and flexible curriculum for Native youth that builds a connection to culture and community and teaches skills that increase participants' feelings of hope, optimism, and self-efficacy. This exploratory study is the first to examine self-reported survey outcomes after the addition of suicide prevention and intervention modules into the curriculum and includes a comparison group of similar youth. Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) models examined changes in scores from the Pre-Survey to the Post-Survey for an intervention group and a comparison group of youth in 2018-2019. Survey responses were combined into composite scores for the following categories of interest: hope, mental health, help-seeking and helping, suicide attempts, culture, and resilience. There were 74 youth in the intervention group (IG) and 59 in the non-intervention group (NIG) who completed both Pre- and Post-Surveys. The IG experienced significant positive effects on the hope and resilience scales from Pre- to Post-Survey, while the youth in the NIG saw a decrease in these same scales from Pre- to Post-Survey. The NIG experienced worse outcomes for mental health, while the IG saw a slight improvement. Despite a small number of youth participants and the naturalistic setting, which limited the ability to control for potential confounding variables, the results from this preliminary study are promising. Future studies with larger numbers of youth and more ability to account for additional factors may potentially show even more benefits of the HOC curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Multiple Avenues of Contribution of Robert McMahon to Prevention Science.","authors":"Patrick H Tolan","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01809-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01809-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This issue of Prevention Science, focused on studies influenced by and reflective of the contributions of Robert McMahon, contains a diverse set of studies focused across multiple important areas of our field. This commentary focuses on that breadth and diversity of contributions as the core of McMahon's role in prevention science. Several specific examples of such impact integrating knowledge across clinical child psychology, developmental psychopathology, and prevention studies are described, and the linkages to articles in this volume noted. Also, noteworthy is the extension of McMahon's influence through collegial and collaborative efforts by convening and facilitating scientific exchange. He has provided a connective enhancement to our field that has benefitted many and continues to influence towards excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Honoring the Work of Robert McMahon: a Commentary on This Special Issue.","authors":"Mark T Greenberg","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01807-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01807-w","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This commentary reviews papers prepared for this Special Issue on the work of Robert McMahon, who served as Editor of Prevention Science and who has played a major role on multiple aspects of parenting research and its relation to conduct problems in children and youth. The Special Issue papers are discussed in the context of the four main foci of Dr. McMahon's work: (1) parenting practices and child development; (2) risk and protective factors in the development and maintenance of conduct problems; (3) family-based treatments for conduct problems; and (4) multicomponent preventive interventions for conduct problems. The papers emphasize the interplay between family dynamics, parenting practices, and developmental trajectories and underscore the importance of considering these factors within the parent the child and the social and cultural context. A clear finding across multiple papers is the importance of inhibitory control and emotion regulation in both predicting conduct problem outcomes across time for children as well as an important treatment focus for improving parenting. These papers re-emphasize McMahon's research, which underscores the importance of early, sustained, and contextually sensitive parenting interventions for promoting lifelong positive outcomes in children and families, as well as the need for longitudinal studies that can reflect these pathways across time. This richly packed issue of papers in honor of Bob McMahon's research and long-term Editorship of Prevention Science is quite remarkable, and it is an honor to write this commentary as his friend and colleague of over 35 years. The papers here focus on four key areas of Dr. McMahon's research career, which focused on multiple aspects of parenting and the development of conduct problems and psychopathology. Broadly speaking, McMahon's work can be divided into more basic and more applied, treatment-focused research. His more basic work centers on the understanding of how conduct problems (and other problem behaviors) develop in children and adolescents, their developmental course over time, and how various risk and protective factors influence their manifestation and stability. On the intervention side, from early in his career his persistent interest was how to effectively prevent and treat these problems with a focus on parenting interventions. As the primary family focused researcher in the (Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, The Fast Track program for children at risk: Preventing antisocial behavior, Guilford Press, 2020), he led the Fast Track intervention work on the development and efficacy of a parenting intervention within the context of a large, multicomponent intervention for children with early, serious conduct problems that is still being studied more than 30 years later. His outstanding, multifaceted career involved both basic and applied research on parenting but always with a focus on how research can impact and improve practice. Here, I re","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Prevention Science and Youth Conduct Problems: Development, Prevention, and Treatment.","authors":"Sarah J Racz, Natalie Goulter, Yao Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01808-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01808-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This introductory article describes this Special Issue entitled Prevention Science and Youth Conduct Problems: Development, Prevention, and Treatment that is being offered in recognition of the research and scientific contributions of Dr. Robert J. McMahon. This Special Issue includes a collection of 15 original empirical research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical pieces spanning three themes consistent with Dr. McMahon's program of research: (1) risk and protective factors in the development and maintenance of youth conduct problems; (2) family based preventive and treatment interventions for youth conduct problems; and (3) multicomponent preventive and treatment interventions for youth conduct problems. Following these articles, this Special Issue contains two commentaries from experts in the fields of youth conduct problems and prevention science, as well as a reflection from Dr. McMahon. Our introduction provides a brief synopsis of each article contained in the Special Issue, identifying how these works reflect upon and were inspired by Dr. McMahon's research legacy and how they advance understanding of conduct problems. We close this introduction with thoughts regarding future research directions that will extend Dr. McMahon's impressive impact on the field of youth conduct problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144020885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Age-Varying Patterns of Cannabis Use, Related Risk Factors, and their Associations among Young Adults in the Context of Legalized Nonmedical Cannabis.","authors":"Griselda Martinez, Brian H Calhoun, Charles B Fleming, Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Jessica Acolin, Isaac C Rhew, Jason R Kilmer, Mary E Larimer, Katarina Guttmannova","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01803-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01803-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study examined age-varying patterns of cannabis use, cannabis-specific risk factors, and their associations across young adulthood. We used repeated cross-sectional data from young adults (N = 15,251; M_age = 22.02 years, SD_age = 2.22; 68% female) who enrolled in the annual, statewide Washington Young Adult Health Survey between 2015 and 2022. Logistic time-varying effect models showed that cannabis use increased from ages 18-22 and remained relatively stable through age 26. Most cannabis-specific risk factors increased gradually across young adulthood, although perceptions of cannabis use acceptability (injunctive norms) increased substantially through age 23 followed by decreases. Ease of obtaining cannabis, perceptions about others' use (descriptive norms), and low perceived physical harm were generally associated with any past-month cannabis use with stronger associations around age 18. Injunctive norms and low perceived psychological harm were consistently associated with past-month use across young adulthood. Ease of obtaining cannabis, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, and low psychological harm were associated with frequent cannabis use across young adulthood with associations strongest prior to age 21. Low perceived physical harm was associated with frequent use across young adulthood with associations getting somewhat stronger across ages. Findings underscore the importance of focusing on cannabis-specific risk factors in preventive intervention efforts over the course of young adulthood, including focus on young adults in their mid- 20 s in the context of legalized cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144041819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Short-Term Impacts of a School-Based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program for Latino Youth: a Cluster Randomized Trial.","authors":"Krystle McConnell, Sahra Ibrahimi, Martha Yumiseva, Salwa Shan, Amy Lewin","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01805-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01805-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates El Camino, a goal-setting sexual health promotion program developed for Latino youth. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in grades 9-12 in 68 classrooms (n = 746 students) across 11 schools in Maryland with large populations of Latino students. A total of 208 students were lost to follow-up, leaving 538 students for an intention-to-treat analysis (El Camino, 34 clusters, n = 289; control, 34 clusters, n = 249). At baseline, most participants (72.1%) reported never having had vaginal sex and no sex in the last 3 months (84.4%). This study did not detect any significant intervention impacts on sexual behavior outcomes but found impacts on several proximal sexual health outcomes. At post-test, approximately 1-2 weeks after curriculum completion, scores were significantly higher among El Camino participants compared to control participants on measures of contraception knowledge (β = 0.5 (cluster robust SE 0.1)), condom knowledge (0.4 (0.1)), consent knowledge (0.3 (0.1)), and awareness of birth control methods (0.9 (0.1)), as well as confidence to discuss sex with a partner (0.3 (0.1)). A total of 84.7% of El Camino participants reported positive attitudes toward condom use compared to 67.1% of control participants (OR = 2.7, 95% CI [1.8, 4.0]); 83.1% reported intending to use condoms if sexually active compared to 72.6% of control participants (1.9, [1.2, 2.9]); 80.9% reported knowing where to get birth control compared to 48.9% of control participants (4.4, [2.8, 7.0]), and 83.3% reported being confident to state and ask for consent compared to 70.5% of control participants (2.1, [1.2, 3.7]). This study also found that intervention impacts varied by student gender and program implementation factors. Overall, El Camino appears to be effective in improving sexual health knowledge, self-efficacy, and intentions among Latino youth.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06485284. Date 7-3 - 24.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144025228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}