Pediatric Suicide Attempt Non-Disclosure: an Analysis of Discrepant Screening Results.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s11121-025-01817-8
Anna Maria Ros, Rachel Ballard, Amanda Burnside, Michael Harries, Aron Janssen
{"title":"Pediatric Suicide Attempt Non-Disclosure: an Analysis of Discrepant Screening Results.","authors":"Anna Maria Ros, Rachel Ballard, Amanda Burnside, Michael Harries, Aron Janssen","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01817-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) is a validated tool developed to assess suicidal risk in pediatric medical settings with one item assessing historical attempts. While the psychometric properties of the ASQ are well-established, little is known about how youth respond to this question upon repeated administrations. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data by youth who received the ASQ from December 2019 to November 2023 at an urban academic children's hospital. Youth who disclosed a suicide attempt but denied an attempt history at a subsequent visit were identified. Multivariate regression and manual chart review were utilized to identify demographic and clinical variables related to non-disclosure of a previously disclosed attempt. Of 1861 encounters (1460 unique patients) with a disclosed historic suicide attempt, re-screening occurred in 503 future encounters. One hundred forty instances of nondisclosure occurred (127 unique patients). Encounters were classified into false positives (N = 26), encounters where nondisclosure by patients did not impact clinical response (N = 40), and encounters where nondisclosure resulted in no further suicide risk assessment (N = 74). Of this last group, 47.3% received no risk assessment at the initial visit. Compared to the initial visit, the nondisclosure visit was more likely to have a medical presenting complaint and to have negative responses on ASQ questions related to recent suicidal ideation. Denial of a historic attempt upon repeat administration of the ASQ is not uncommon among pediatric patients, and this is more likely to occur at an encounter for a medical presenting complaint.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"751-759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01817-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) is a validated tool developed to assess suicidal risk in pediatric medical settings with one item assessing historical attempts. While the psychometric properties of the ASQ are well-established, little is known about how youth respond to this question upon repeated administrations. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data by youth who received the ASQ from December 2019 to November 2023 at an urban academic children's hospital. Youth who disclosed a suicide attempt but denied an attempt history at a subsequent visit were identified. Multivariate regression and manual chart review were utilized to identify demographic and clinical variables related to non-disclosure of a previously disclosed attempt. Of 1861 encounters (1460 unique patients) with a disclosed historic suicide attempt, re-screening occurred in 503 future encounters. One hundred forty instances of nondisclosure occurred (127 unique patients). Encounters were classified into false positives (N = 26), encounters where nondisclosure by patients did not impact clinical response (N = 40), and encounters where nondisclosure resulted in no further suicide risk assessment (N = 74). Of this last group, 47.3% received no risk assessment at the initial visit. Compared to the initial visit, the nondisclosure visit was more likely to have a medical presenting complaint and to have negative responses on ASQ questions related to recent suicidal ideation. Denial of a historic attempt upon repeat administration of the ASQ is not uncommon among pediatric patients, and this is more likely to occur at an encounter for a medical presenting complaint.

儿童自杀企图保密:筛查结果差异分析。
Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ)是一种经过验证的工具,用于评估儿科医疗环境中的自杀风险,其中一项评估历史企图。虽然ASQ的心理测量特性是公认的,但很少有人知道年轻人在反复服用后对这个问题的反应。我们对2019年12月至2023年11月在某城市学院型儿童医院接受ASQ的青少年电子病历数据进行了回顾性分析。在随后的访问中,发现了那些透露有自杀企图但否认有自杀企图史的年轻人。使用多元回归和手工图表回顾来确定与未披露先前披露的尝试相关的人口学和临床变量。在1861例(1460例独特的患者)有公开的历史自杀企图的病例中,对503例未来的病例进行了重新筛查。发生了140例未披露的情况(127例独特的患者)。遭遇分为假阳性(N = 26),患者不披露不影响临床反应(N = 40),以及不披露导致没有进一步自杀风险评估(N = 74)。在最后一组中,47.3%的人在初次就诊时没有接受风险评估。与第一次访问相比,保密访问更有可能有医疗投诉,并且在与近期自杀意念相关的ASQ问题上有负面反应。在儿科患者中,拒绝重复使用ASQ的历史性尝试并不罕见,这更有可能发生在遇到医学主诉时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信