Unpacking the Black Box: Exploring Differences in Practices, Skills, and Knowledge Taught in School-Based Mindfulness Programs.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Prevention Science Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s11121-025-01819-6
Sebrina L Doyle Fosco, Deborah L Schussler
{"title":"Unpacking the Black Box: Exploring Differences in Practices, Skills, and Knowledge Taught in School-Based Mindfulness Programs.","authors":"Sebrina L Doyle Fosco, Deborah L Schussler","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01819-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School-based mindfulness programs (SBMPs) have shown a range of academic, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. However, heterogeneity in curricular content obscures accurate interpretation of results. To unpack the \"black box\" of SBMPs and better contextualize intervention outcomes, this investigation examined the practices, skills, and knowledge conveyed in twelve curricula. Required curricular elements (CEs) from the written curricula were coded for mindfulness practices and skills, and lessons were coded for mindfulness knowledge conveyed. Curricula had a different composition of components depending on theoretical foundation and program length. All curricula included intrapersonal (i.e., individual) practices, most often engaging somatic awareness. Interpersonal (i.e., relational) practices were identified in eight curricula and were infrequent, except in two programs that focused on kindness/compassion. All curricula cultivated intrapersonal skills of focused attention, emotion awareness, and emotion regulation at varying levels. Programs derived from MBSR cultivated the highest proportion of skills focused on awareness of mental states. Longer programs had a significantly higher proportion of CEs focused on interpersonal skills compared to shorter programs. Longer programs also had a higher proportion of lessons concentrated on focused attention and on empathy/perspective taking. Knowledge conveyed in lessons did not always correspond to the practices and skills coded, indicating students may be learning about topics even if they are not actively practicing or engaged in skill cultivation. This study offers clarity regarding the curricular content of SBMPs, making it possible to investigate links between active ingredients and program outcomes, refine theories of change, and better prepare teachers facilitating SBMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":"827-838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01819-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School-based mindfulness programs (SBMPs) have shown a range of academic, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. However, heterogeneity in curricular content obscures accurate interpretation of results. To unpack the "black box" of SBMPs and better contextualize intervention outcomes, this investigation examined the practices, skills, and knowledge conveyed in twelve curricula. Required curricular elements (CEs) from the written curricula were coded for mindfulness practices and skills, and lessons were coded for mindfulness knowledge conveyed. Curricula had a different composition of components depending on theoretical foundation and program length. All curricula included intrapersonal (i.e., individual) practices, most often engaging somatic awareness. Interpersonal (i.e., relational) practices were identified in eight curricula and were infrequent, except in two programs that focused on kindness/compassion. All curricula cultivated intrapersonal skills of focused attention, emotion awareness, and emotion regulation at varying levels. Programs derived from MBSR cultivated the highest proportion of skills focused on awareness of mental states. Longer programs had a significantly higher proportion of CEs focused on interpersonal skills compared to shorter programs. Longer programs also had a higher proportion of lessons concentrated on focused attention and on empathy/perspective taking. Knowledge conveyed in lessons did not always correspond to the practices and skills coded, indicating students may be learning about topics even if they are not actively practicing or engaged in skill cultivation. This study offers clarity regarding the curricular content of SBMPs, making it possible to investigate links between active ingredients and program outcomes, refine theories of change, and better prepare teachers facilitating SBMPs.

打开黑盒子:探索在学校正念课程中教授的实践、技能和知识的差异。
以学校为基础的正念课程(SBMPs)已经显示出一系列学术、情感和行为上的结果。然而,课程内容的异质性模糊了对结果的准确解释。为了打开SBMPs的“黑箱”,更好地将干预结果置于背景下,本调查调查了12门课程中所传达的实践、技能和知识。书面课程中的必修课程元素(ce)编码为正念练习和技能,课程编码为所传达的正念知识。根据理论基础和课程长度的不同,课程的组成部分也不同。所有的课程都包括个人(即个人)的实践,最常涉及的是身体意识。人际(即关系)实践在八个课程中被确定,除了两个专注于善良/同情的课程外,这些实践并不常见。所有课程都在不同程度上培养了集中注意力、情绪意识和情绪调节的个人技能。从正念减压法衍生的课程培养出的专注于意识心理状态的技能比例最高。与较短的课程相比,较长的课程中关注人际关系技能的ce比例明显更高。在较长的课程中,集中注意力和同理心/视角的课程所占比例也更高。课堂上传达的知识并不总是与编码的实践和技能相对应,这表明即使学生没有积极实践或从事技能培养,他们也可能在学习主题。本研究明确了SBMPs的课程内容,使调查有效成分与项目成果之间的联系成为可能,完善了变革理论,并使教师更好地准备促进SBMPs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信