Early Effects of Communities That Care on the Adoption and Implementation Fidelity of Evidence-Based Prevention Programs in Communities: Results from a Quasi-experimental Study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
L Decker, I von Holt, S Ünlü, U Walter, D Röding
{"title":"Early Effects of Communities That Care on the Adoption and Implementation Fidelity of Evidence-Based Prevention Programs in Communities: Results from a Quasi-experimental Study.","authors":"L Decker, I von Holt, S Ünlü, U Walter, D Röding","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01823-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, few evidence-based prevention programs (EBP) have been implemented in Germany, despite their growing availability. Some prevention researchers have stated that prevention support systems such as Communities That Care (CTC) could contribute to the wider spread of EBP in Germany and improve the fidelity of EBP implementation. Our study aims to investigate whether CTC leads to greater adoption of EBP in German communities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 22 intervention communities (IC) and 22 comparison communities (CC). Data collection occurred at two time points (T0: 2021/2022 and T1: 2023/2024), capturing information on which EBP were implemented in these communities during the prior school year, the number of people reached, and the quality of EBP implementation. Data from 17 IC and 12 CC were included in the final analyses. At T0, there were no significant differences between IC and CC in the number of EBP implemented or the number of people reached. In the IC, the average number of EBP implemented was 3.57 per 10,000 residents at T0, which increased significantly to 8.57 at T1 (p = .004). In the CC, the average number rose from 1.88 at T0 to 3.41 at T1, though this change was not statistically significant (p = .089). Regarding reach, an average of 140 people per 10,000 residents were reached with EBP at T0 in IC, increasing to 407 by T1, while in CC, the average increased from 77 at T0 to 300 at T1. Neither group showed a statistically significant increase in reach. Implementation fidelity remained consistently high in both groups at both time points. The results suggest that CTC may encourage communities to implement more EBP. However, the findings may be influenced by confounding factors and the relatively short observation period. Further research with an extended follow-up is therefore recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01823-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, few evidence-based prevention programs (EBP) have been implemented in Germany, despite their growing availability. Some prevention researchers have stated that prevention support systems such as Communities That Care (CTC) could contribute to the wider spread of EBP in Germany and improve the fidelity of EBP implementation. Our study aims to investigate whether CTC leads to greater adoption of EBP in German communities. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 22 intervention communities (IC) and 22 comparison communities (CC). Data collection occurred at two time points (T0: 2021/2022 and T1: 2023/2024), capturing information on which EBP were implemented in these communities during the prior school year, the number of people reached, and the quality of EBP implementation. Data from 17 IC and 12 CC were included in the final analyses. At T0, there were no significant differences between IC and CC in the number of EBP implemented or the number of people reached. In the IC, the average number of EBP implemented was 3.57 per 10,000 residents at T0, which increased significantly to 8.57 at T1 (p = .004). In the CC, the average number rose from 1.88 at T0 to 3.41 at T1, though this change was not statistically significant (p = .089). Regarding reach, an average of 140 people per 10,000 residents were reached with EBP at T0 in IC, increasing to 407 by T1, while in CC, the average increased from 77 at T0 to 300 at T1. Neither group showed a statistically significant increase in reach. Implementation fidelity remained consistently high in both groups at both time points. The results suggest that CTC may encourage communities to implement more EBP. However, the findings may be influenced by confounding factors and the relatively short observation period. Further research with an extended follow-up is therefore recommended.

社区护理对社区循证预防项目采用和实施保真度的早期影响:一项准实验研究的结果
迄今为止,在德国实施的循证预防项目(EBP)很少,尽管它们的可用性越来越高。一些预防研究人员指出,社区护理(CTC)等预防支持系统可以促进EBP在德国的广泛传播,并提高EBP实施的保真度。我们的研究旨在调查CTC是否会导致德国社区更多地采用EBP。对22个干预社区(IC)和22个比较社区(CC)进行了准实验研究。数据收集发生在两个时间点(T0: 2021/2022和T1: 2023/2024),获取在上一学年在这些社区实施了EBP的信息、达到的人数和EBP实施的质量。17例IC和12例CC的数据被纳入最终分析。在T0时,IC和CC在实施EBP的数量或达到的人数方面没有显著差异。在IC中,实施EBP的平均人数在T0时为每10,000居民3.57人,在T1时显著增加到8.57人(p = 0.004)。在CC中,平均数量从T0时的1.88上升到T1时的3.41,尽管这种变化没有统计学意义(p = 0.089)。在覆盖范围方面,东九龙区平均每万名居民中有140人在T0时达到EBP,到T1时增加到407人,而东九龙区平均从T0时的77人增加到T1时的300人。两组的接触范围都没有统计学上的显著增加。在两个时间点,两组的执行保真度都保持在较高水平。结果表明,CTC可以鼓励社区实施更多的EBP。然而,结果可能受到混杂因素和相对较短的观察期的影响。因此,建议进行进一步的研究并进行长期随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信