Social Development最新文献_第6页

Domain‐general or specific: How is children's understanding of deception socialized? 领域-一般或特定:儿童对欺骗的理解是如何社会化的?

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12712

Jedediah W. P. Allen, Demet Kara

{"title":"Domain‐general or specific: How is children's understanding of deception socialized?","authors":"Jedediah W. P. Allen, Demet Kara","doi":"10.1111/sode.12712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12712","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The current study investigated parenting influences on children's understanding of lie‐telling in eight different social situations. These social situations clustered into two broad categories that have been assumed in the literature: first, self‐oriented lies that were generally told to benefit the self (e.g., to avoid punishment or gain status); and second, socio‐culturally‐oriented lies that were told for more social reasons (e.g., to create positive affect, maintain modesty or politeness). Two types of parenting variables were also measured. The first concerned more general parenting practices and have been studied in the literature; while the second was about more specific parental deceptive behaviors like lying to your child for their compliance. Participants included 141 Turkish parent‐child dyads aged 7, 9, and 11. All children judged the self‐oriented and the socio‐cultural lies as inappropriate but more so for the self‐oriented ones; further, the socio‐cultural lies were judged less negatively with age. While general parenting practices did not predict children's judgments, for parental deceptive practices, there were strong negative relationships between parents’ use of threatening lies (e.g., “come with me or I'll leave you here”) and children's judgments for both self‐ and socio‐cultural lie types. The two main conclusions are that specific parental deceptive practices are more relevant than general parenting for understanding children's judgments about lie‐telling situations. Second, the assumed categorization of lies into “self‐” and “social‐” seems generally valid when using a plurality of situations. Finally, some issues related to the morality of lie‐telling are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136061364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How bad is it to eat an intelligent chicken? Children's judgments of eating animals are less ‘self‐serving’ than adults 吃一只聪明的鸡有多糟糕?与成年人相比，孩子们对吃动物的判断不那么“自私”

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12709

Heather Henseler Kozachenko, Jared Piazza

引用次数: 0

Reputation and prosocial lies in development 信誉和亲社会在于发展

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12711

Cynthia Xinran Guo, Philippe Rochat

引用次数: 0

Peers' Emotionality and Children's Academic Achievement in Second Grade: Testing the Moderating Role of Children's Behavioral Self-Regulation. 同伴情绪与二年级儿童学业成绩：测试儿童行为自我调节的调节作用。

IF 1.6 4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12657

Maciel M Hernández, Nancy Eisenberg, Carlos Valiente, Tracy L Spinrad, Rebecca H Berger, Sarah K Johns, Anjolii Diaz, Diana E Gal-Szabo, Marilyn S Thompson, Jody Southworth, Armando A Pina

{"title":"Peers' Emotionality and Children's Academic Achievement in Second Grade: Testing the Moderating Role of Children's Behavioral Self-Regulation.","authors":"Maciel M Hernández, Nancy Eisenberg, Carlos Valiente, Tracy L Spinrad, Rebecca H Berger, Sarah K Johns, Anjolii Diaz, Diana E Gal-Szabo, Marilyn S Thompson, Jody Southworth, Armando A Pina","doi":"10.1111/sode.12657","DOIUrl":"10.1111/sode.12657","url":null,"abstract":"Although there is interest in the role of peers in children's schooling experiences, few researchers have examined associations and related underlying processes between peers' emotionality, an aspect of temperament, and children's academic achievement. This study evaluated whether target children's (N = 260) own self-regulation, assessed with two behavioral measures, served a moderating function for associations between peers' emotionality and children's own academic achievement in second grade. There was a positive association between peers' positive emotionality and reading scores for children with higher self-regulation. Peers' negative emotionality was negatively related to target children's reading scores, particularly for children with higher self-regulation levels, but was unrelated to math scores. Peers' positive and negative emotionality did not predict math scores, and there was no strong evidence for the moderating role of target children's self-regulation in this association. This study highlights the potential role of children's self-regulation in modulating peer effects on academic achievement, particularly reading.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":"32 3","pages":"793-812"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545340/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41158964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social Development 社会发展

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12614

引用次数: 0

Social Development 社会发展

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12612

引用次数: 0

Social Development 社会发展

4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2023-01-17 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12610

引用次数: 0

Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending. 青少年间接、直接和混合同伴防御动机的差异。

IF 2 4区心理学

Social Development Pub Date : 2019-05-01 Epub Date: 2018-11-27 DOI: 10.1111/sode.12348

Jeroen Pronk, Tjeert Olthof, Frits A Goossens, Lydia Krabbendam

{"title":"Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending.","authors":"Jeroen Pronk, Tjeert Olthof, Frits A Goossens, Lydia Krabbendam","doi":"10.1111/sode.12348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12348","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Adolescents’ defending of peers who are being bullied—or peer defending—was recently found to be a heterogeneous behavioral construct. The present study investigated individual differences in adolescents’ motivations for executing these indirect, direct, and hybrid defending behaviors. In line with the literature on bullying as goal‐directed strategic behavior, we adopted a social evolution theory framework to investigate whether these peer‐defending behaviors could qualify as goal‐directed strategic prosocial behaviors. A sample of 549 Dutch adolescents (49.4% boys; M age = 12.5 years, SD = 0.6 years) participated in this study. Their peer reported defending behaviors (including bullying behavior as a control variable) and the following behavioral motivations were assessed: (a) agentic and communal goals (self‐report), (b) prosocial and coercive social strategies (peer report), and (c) altruistic and egocentric motivations for prosocial behavior (self‐report). The outcomes of hierarchical linear regression analyses suggest that adolescents’ motivations for executing the different subtypes of peer defending partially overlap but are also different. While indirect defending was fostered by genuine concerns for victims’ well‐being, direct defending was more motivated by personal gains. Hybrid defending combined favorable aspects of both indirect and direct defending as a goal‐directed, strategic, and altruistically motivated prosocial behavior. The implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":"28 2","pages":"414-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/sode.12348","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41216356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23