Children's and adolescents’ evaluations of wealth‐related STEM inequality

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Luke McGuire, Christina Marlow, Adam J. Hoffman, Angelina Joy, Fidelia Law, Adam Hartstone‐Rose, Adam Rutland, Mark Winterbottom, Frances Balkwill, Karen P. Burns, Laurence Butler, Grace Fields, Kelly Lynn Mulvey
{"title":"Children's and adolescents’ evaluations of wealth‐related STEM inequality","authors":"Luke McGuire, Christina Marlow, Adam J. Hoffman, Angelina Joy, Fidelia Law, Adam Hartstone‐Rose, Adam Rutland, Mark Winterbottom, Frances Balkwill, Karen P. Burns, Laurence Butler, Grace Fields, Kelly Lynn Mulvey","doi":"10.1111/sode.12710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are rife with inequalities and under‐representation that have their roots in childhood. While researchers have focused on gender and race/ethnicity as two key dimensions of inequality, less attention has been paid to wealth. To this end, and drawing from the Social Reasoning Development approach, we examined children's and adolescents’ perceptions of STEM ability and access to opportunities as a function of wealth, as well as their desire to rectify such inequalities. Participants ( n = 234: early childhood, n = 70, mean age = 6.33, SD = .79; middle childhood, n = 92, mean age = 8.90, SD = .83 and early adolescence, n = 62, mean age = 12.00; SD = 1.16) in the U.K. (64% White British) and U.S. (40% White/European American) read about two characters, one high‐wealth and one low‐wealth. In early childhood, participants reported that the high‐wealth character would have greater STEM ability and were just as likely to invite either character to take part in a STEM opportunity. By middle childhood, participants were more likely to report equal STEM abilities for both characters and to seek to rectify inequalities by inviting the low‐wealth character to take part in a STEM opportunity. However, older participants reported that peers would still prefer to invite the high‐wealth character. These findings also varied by ethnic group status, with minority status participants rectifying inequalities at a younger age than majority status participants. Together these findings document that children are aware of STEM inequalities based on wealth and, with age, will increasingly seek to rectify these inequalities.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are rife with inequalities and under‐representation that have their roots in childhood. While researchers have focused on gender and race/ethnicity as two key dimensions of inequality, less attention has been paid to wealth. To this end, and drawing from the Social Reasoning Development approach, we examined children's and adolescents’ perceptions of STEM ability and access to opportunities as a function of wealth, as well as their desire to rectify such inequalities. Participants ( n = 234: early childhood, n = 70, mean age = 6.33, SD = .79; middle childhood, n = 92, mean age = 8.90, SD = .83 and early adolescence, n = 62, mean age = 12.00; SD = 1.16) in the U.K. (64% White British) and U.S. (40% White/European American) read about two characters, one high‐wealth and one low‐wealth. In early childhood, participants reported that the high‐wealth character would have greater STEM ability and were just as likely to invite either character to take part in a STEM opportunity. By middle childhood, participants were more likely to report equal STEM abilities for both characters and to seek to rectify inequalities by inviting the low‐wealth character to take part in a STEM opportunity. However, older participants reported that peers would still prefer to invite the high‐wealth character. These findings also varied by ethnic group status, with minority status participants rectifying inequalities at a younger age than majority status participants. Together these findings document that children are aware of STEM inequalities based on wealth and, with age, will increasingly seek to rectify these inequalities.
儿童和青少年对与财富相关的STEM不平等的评价
科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域充斥着源于童年的不平等和代表性不足。虽然研究人员将性别和种族/民族作为不平等的两个关键维度,但对财富的关注却很少。为此,我们借鉴社会推理发展方法,研究了儿童和青少年对STEM能力和获得机会的看法,以及他们纠正这种不平等的愿望。参与者(n = 234):早期儿童,n = 70,平均年龄= 6.33,SD = 0.79;童年中期,n = 92,平均年龄= 8.90,SD = 0.83;青春期早期,n = 62,平均年龄= 12.00;SD = 1.16),英国(64%的英国白人)和美国(40%的白人/欧洲裔美国人)阅读了两个角色,一个是高财富阶层,一个是低财富阶层。在儿童早期,参与者报告说,高财富的角色会有更大的STEM能力,并且很可能邀请其中任何一个角色参加STEM机会。到了童年中期,参与者更有可能报告两个角色的STEM能力相同,并通过邀请低财富角色参加STEM机会来寻求纠正不平等。然而,年长的参与者报告说,同伴们仍然更愿意邀请富有的角色。这些发现也因种族地位而异,少数族裔参与者比多数族裔参与者更早纠正不平等。这些调查结果表明,儿童意识到基于财富的STEM不平等,随着年龄的增长,他们将越来越多地寻求纠正这些不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信