Georgia M Winters, Elizabeth L Jeglic, Samantha Matthews
{"title":"The Use of Sexual Grooming by Attorneys in Court.","authors":"Georgia M Winters, Elizabeth L Jeglic, Samantha Matthews","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child sexual abuse (CSA) cases rely on attorneys, judges, and jurors having an accurate understanding of complex abuse dynamics, including sexual grooming. While sexual grooming is widely used in research and legal contexts, little is known about how attorneys understand and use the construct. This study examined attorneys' knowledge, perceptions, and utilization of sexual grooming in CSA cases. Fifty-one attorneys from 23 U.S. states completed an online survey. Attorneys viewed sexual grooming as useful (M = 8.82/10), with 88% having used it in their cases. Around half (55%) used expert testimony on the topic, which they rated as highly helpful (M = 9.08/10). Most attorneys learned about sexual grooming through professional trainings, and many expressed a need for additional expert witnesses and investigative evidence on sexual grooming. Sexual grooming is valued in CSA prosecution and thus, continued education, expert consultation, and use of current research are important.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148498272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Moving Beyond \"Malingering\": Reconceptualizing Feigned Symptoms as Motive-Based Phenomena.","authors":"Jacob M Appel","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malingering-traditionally defined as the intentional production of false or exaggerated symptoms for external gain-has long been treated as a unitary construct. Yet patients who feign illness do so for widely divergent reasons, from seeking material necessities to avoiding legal accountability. This paper critiques the limitations of \"malingering\" as a clinical category and proposes a motivation-based taxonomy of feigned symptoms: Resource-Driven Symptom Expression (RDSE), Accountability-Avoidant Symptom Expression (AASE), Care Access Symptom Expression (CASE), and Socially Motivated Symptom Expression (SMSE). By reframing feigned presentations through motive rather than symptomatology, clinicians can bring an individualized, ethical and just approach to a significant clinical challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148473436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Beyond the Adversarial Rivalry: A Developmental Rights-Based Model for Minor-on-Minor Crime, Part 1.","authors":"Tali Gal, Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When children harm children, the conventional victim-perpetrator framework is ill-equipped to address the developmental, relational, and institutional complexities involved. While juvenile justice scholarship increasingly emphasizes rehabilitation, and victims' rights literature has advanced child-sensitive protection, minor-on-minor offending remains underexplored across legal and social science disciplines. This Review Article draws on legal and criminological literature in juvenile justice, child development, and therapeutic jurisprudence, to examine tensions between the rights and interests of minor defendants and victims, and to identify the absence of an integrated framework within the juvenile justice system. To address this gap, we outline a four-pillar model integrating therapeutic justice, developmental principles, relational procedural justice, and children's rights norms. In this first of a two-parts project, we develop the theoretical framework for such cases and consider its novelty. Part II applies it to two case studies and offers practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148406334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Increasing the Incentive to Serve: The Effects of a Juror Pay Increase in Texas.","authors":"Mary R Rose, Max Lisch, Faris A Husain","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although low juror pay is commonly offered as a reason why jurors do not show up to jury service, there is remarkably little empirical information on how juror pay affects summons response. This study examines four large-sized counties in Texas before and after pay increased from as little as $6 a day to $40, analyzing patterns of the percent of available jurors and non-response (\"no show\") across time. Although there was, on average, a larger percentage of available jurors in the years following the pay raise compared to those preceding it, there is little evidence that this increase is attributable to the change in pay, particularly given a trend of having more available jurors that pre-existed the raise. Additionally, summons response does not appear sensitive to over-time inflationary pressures. Results suggest that pay may not be the best place to focus attention if the goal is to generate an overall higher summons response rate, although states should ensure that rates are not insultingly low, and we encourage more work on whether targeted increases for low-income persons have an effect on that population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148399667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Drouin, Jody M Ross, Dennis E Reidy, Jeff R Temple, Tara L Cornelius
{"title":"Current State of Psychological Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Legal Proceedings.","authors":"Michelle Drouin, Jody M Ross, Dennis E Reidy, Jeff R Temple, Tara L Cornelius","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious and widespread public health concern. Not only has it been the subject of thousands of papers published over the past three decades, but it also appears frequently in legal proceedings across criminal, civil, and family court contexts. To have currency in the field, forensic experts and other individuals working in court systems must identify and synthesize a wide and complex body of literature, from the conceptual underpinnings of IPV to issues of memory and trauma, many of which may affect victim participation, testimony, and credibility. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and concise summary of several foundational IPV studies, as well as some that have built upon these theoretical models and empirically tested the premises, focusing on key findings relevant to legal proceedings. We also spotlight potential avenues of expert testimony, including \"counterintuitive\" victim behavior, coercive control, persistence in abusive relationships, delayed reporting, technology-facilitated abuse, and factors that may impact the way in which IPV is manifested or reported (e.g., cultural factors, interpersonal context). Finally, we discuss the wider implications of this work for law and policy, focusing on the continuous need for empirically-grounded testimony in the courtroom.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148388149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Beyond the Adversarial Rivalry: A Developmental Rights-Based Model for Minor-on-Minor Crime, Part 2.","authors":"Tali Gal, Ruthy Lowenstein Lazar","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When children harm children, the conventional victim-perpetrator framework is ill-equipped to address the developmental, relational, and institutional complexities involved. While juvenile justice scholarship increasingly emphasizes rehabilitation, and victims' rights literature has advanced child-sensitive protections, minor-on-minor offending remains underexplored across legal and social science disciplines. Part 1 of this two-parts project developed a four-pillar theoretical framework integrating therapeutic justice, developmental principles, relational procedural justice, and children's rights norms. The present Article considers the implementation of the proposed model through two paradigmatic case studies, concerning victim impact statements and the handling of sensitive disclosures. Through these scenarios, the Article addresses possible critiques against the model and illustrates how it can protect minor victims' rights, foster rehabilitation for juvenile defendants, and mitigate secondary trauma for both parties. Building on the theoretical model and case-study analysis, we offer some guiding principles for promoting a developmentally informed and rights respecting juvenile justice system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148388082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Narrative Review on Juvenile Offense and the Impact and Implications of Internalizing Disorders.","authors":"Chaitanya Reddy, Shruti Tilak, Joyce Godinho, Avantika Kumar","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth involved in the juvenile justice system carry a significant burden of mental health challenges. Internalizing disorders such as depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, self-harm, and suicidal behavior are common among justice-involved youth, but often remain overlooked. These conditions influence behavior, increase vulnerability to offending, and heighten the risk of repeated involvement with the juvenile justice system. This review examines the role of internalizing disorders in juvenile offense, and highlights how inward distress can contribute to outward behavioral disturbances. It brings together evidence from multiple countries and shows that untreated internalizing symptoms are linked to higher rates of reoffending, adverse life outcomes, and increased suicide risk. The review also summarizes interventions that address mental health needs among justice-involved youth, including cognitive behavioral therapy, family-based approaches, mindfulness practices, and mentoring models. These interventions show promise for symptom reduction, emotional regulation, and lowering recidivism. The review places special focus on Low- and Middle Income Countries where limited resources, stigma, and gaps in mental health services create major barriers to care. Overall, the findings point to the need for prevention, early recognition and intervention for internalizing disorders within juvenile justice systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148303432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Behavioral and Cognitive Equivalence Threshold: Foundations for the Practical Extension of Atkins and Roper.","authors":"Jack C Lennon","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States Supreme Court's proportionality decisions in Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons rest on a single constitutional principle: individuals who lack the behavioral and cognitive capacities necessary for full culpability cannot be sentenced to death. Contemporary neuroscience now provides the ability to measure these capacities directly. Research demonstrates that the neural systems supporting judgment, behavioral inhibition, emotional regulation, and future-oriented reasoning mature heterogeneously, vary substantially across individuals, and can be impaired by developmental deviation, psychiatric illness, traumatic injury, or neurodegenerative disease. Quantitative neuroimaging enables these impairments to be identified through norm-referenced structural and functional metrics, revealing when an individual's neural functioning falls below statistically defined thresholds. Behavioral and cognitive equivalence (BACE) operationalizes the Court's constitutional requirement by determining whether an individual's measurable functioning is equivalent to that of categorically exempt groups. Using validated neuroimaging techniques, normative modeling, and network-level analysis, BACE represents a transparent, reproducible method for assessing diminished capacity consistent with Hall v. Florida and Moore v. Texas. Integrating contemporary neuroscience with constitutional proportionality therefore supports extending categorical protection to individuals whose measurable impairments render them functionally incapable of the culpability required for capital punishment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148296975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Adverse Childhood Experiences Paradigm and Forensic/Correctional Populations: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Michael Welner, Matt DeLisi","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are increasingly referenced in criminology, several factors question the salience of ACEs to forensic and correctional populations in both the juvenile and adult criminal justice systems. Here, our scoping review of 99 studies examines the ACEs paradigm and its application to forensic/correctional populations by (1) synthesizing research on ACEs among diverse forensic/correctional populations, particularly youth but also among adults for whom childhood and adolescent adversity has sentencing implications, (2) highlighting intervening processes which mediate, moderate, or redirect the effects of ACEs, and (3) identifying methodological issues and potential confounding effects that pose validity threats to ACEs as an explanatory variable among adolescent and adult offenders and regarding downstream justice system outcomes (e.g., recidivism). When mediating variables are considered, the association between ACEs and antisocial conduct is substantially reduced. Among juvenile offenders, temperament, social bonds, current drug use, or psychopathic features account for 40%-100% of the associations between ACEs and recidivism, gang association, or serious, violent, and chronic offending. These intervening effects are so substantial that studies should migrate from simple ACE-offending designs to more complex, ecologically valid models which specify ACEs as a distal predictor, preferably using longitudinal data. In terms of forensic practice, assessment establishes validity only by respecting the unique experience of the individual rather than homogenizing reactions to abusive home environments, or other circumstances that fractured the family unit. Forensic examination should not overlook downstream life circumstances regardless of their statistical association with ACEs. As a person matures, adult events and experiences more directly influence criminal choices and criminal activity relative to adverse experiences during childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148297006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Front-End Governance of Juvenile Cybercrime in China: Platform Accountability, Risk Mitigation, and Tri-Partite Collaboration.","authors":"Zhengfa Zi, Ziteng Yuan, Shiqi Zhang, Wanqiang Wu","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Juvenile cybercrime is a salient governance challenge in digitalizing societies, yet scholarship concentrates on ex post sanction and under-theorizes the interaction among platform design, the digital risk environment, and minors' developmental vulnerability. Drawing on K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms, this study develops a \"front-end governance\" framework anchored in the best-interests-of-the-child principle and articulated through three doctrinal pillars, the platform duty of risk mitigation, the regulation of harmful design and risky digital environments, and the foreseeability of risk. An empirical component, based on a cross-sectional survey in China, examines institutional support for prevention. Endorsement is broad, 92% for strengthened market regulation, 91% for cyber-law education, 84% for technical firewalls, and 83% for internet classification and digital curfews. On responsibility allocation, 76% prioritize tri-partite collaborative governance involving families, schools, and society. Multinomial logistic regression indicates occupational positioning is the only significant predictor of priority orientation; regional, income, and educational variation are non-significant once controls are applied, a null pattern we read as suggestive rather than confirmatory. The findings support a shift from ex post sanction to ex ante risk governance, organized around platform accountability, age-appropriate design, rule-of-law education, and graded content ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148273476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}