{"title":"The Influence of Victim Blame Statements and Expert Testimony on Jury Decision Making During Cases of Sexual Assault","authors":"Olivia N. Grella, Kayla A. Burd","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70042","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rape myths are pervasive beliefs about sex crimes that can significantly influence trial outcomes. Expert testimony has been proposed as a method to mitigate the effect of rape myths within trials, but research to date is mixed. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of the presence and content of expert testimony in a criminal trial of rape. Participants (<i>N</i> = 155) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (i.e., no expert testimony, general expert testimony regarding rape myths, specific expert testimony discussing a particular rape myth). Participants rendered a verdict and answered questions regarding perceptions of the victim and defendant (i.e., believability, credibility, and responsibility). Though expert testimony did not influence verdicts, perceptions of the victim (e.g., credibility, confidence that the victim was raped) were most favorable when participants were exposed to the general expert testimony. Expert testimony did not impact perceptions of the defendant. Results indicate that expert testimony may be effective at influencing certain perceptions of the victim. Future research should continue to investigate other ways that expert testimony may be effective in mitigating the influence of rape myths.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"281-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Wieberneit, Lies Notebaert, Joseph Clare, Hilde Tubex
{"title":"Inoculation in the Courtroom: The Effect of Judicial Direction Timing on Mock Juror Decisions in a Rape Trial","authors":"Michelle Wieberneit, Lies Notebaert, Joseph Clare, Hilde Tubex","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In Australia, judges may issue judicial directions during a trial to counter the rape myth that resistance is required for a rape to be legitimate, despite many victim-survivors freezing. Drawing on inoculation theory, this study tested whether the timing of such directions influences verdicts and perceptions of complainant credibility in an acquaintance rape trial. Australian community members (<i>N</i> = 250) were randomly assigned to receive directions before, during, after, or both before and after cross-examination, or to a no-direction control. Judicial direction timing had no significant effect on verdicts or complainant believability. Higher rape myth acceptance was associated with a lower likelihood of conviction, with men scoring significantly higher on rape myth acceptance than women. Exploratory analyses showed that complainant believability predicted verdict outcomes, while prior jury service was associated with a lower likelihood of conviction. These findings suggest that rape myth acceptance may outweigh the influence of judicial directions.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"332-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146167259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disaggregating the Monolith: Exploring Differences in Rape Myth Acceptance Among People With Varied LGBTQ+ Identities","authors":"Suzanne St. George, Amber Amin, Skyler Morgan","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Much of the rape myth literature ignores the experiences of LGBTQ+ people, and studies that do consider LGBTQ+ people's attitudes commonly treat LGBTQ+ respondents as a homogenous group or rely on small sample sizes that limit LGBTQ+ heterogeneity. In the current study, we use a large sample (<i>n</i>-total = 2962; <i>n</i>-LGBTQ+ = 634) composed of students and MTurk workers to explore rape myth acceptance among people with cisgender, transgender, heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual, queer, and other identities. We found that LGBTQ+ people had higher RMA than cisgender-heterosexual people. Disaggregating the LGBTQ+ group revealed important and unexpected intragroup differences. Notably, cisgender bisexual men had the highest RMA followed by heterosexual men and trans people. Given the empirical relationship between RMA and sexual assault victimization, help-seeking, and criminal-legal responses, elevated RMA among bisexual men and trans people indicates a need for targeted, identity-specific and LGBTQ+-sensitive rape prevention programs and victim support services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"235-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Transgender Individuals and the Law: Part II Introductory Essay","authors":"Margarita Abi Zeid Daou, Alan R. Felthous","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"296-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147628601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Public Perceptions of Marital Rape: Does Level of Force Used Have an Impact?","authors":"Leanne Hanney, Amy Shelford, Andy Guppy","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70036","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research indicates that marital rape is viewed by the public as less harmful to a victim than stranger/acquaintance rape. The aim of the study is to extend the research conducted by Robinson in 2017, investigating how levels of force influence perceptions of marital rape. The study also examines how rape perception is influenced by rape myth acceptance and attitudes towards women. The current study improves on previous work by controlling for individual differences across groups using a repeated-measures design. The results indicate that as the level of force increases the perception of marital rape increases. Positive attitudes towards women and low rape myth acceptance are also found to have a positive impact on perceptions of marital rape. Based on these findings, it is possible to recommend that further awareness of legislation regarding coercion and marital rape is required within the public domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"224-234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sex Trafficking Myth Reduction: Evaluating an Educational Approach to Reducing Victim Blaming and Increasing Victim Empathy","authors":"Dara Mojtahedi, Gemma Hewitt, Sophie Fitton","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined the effectiveness of a brief educational intervention designed to reduce sex trafficking (ST) myth acceptance. Using a 2 × 2 mixed design, participants (<i>N</i> = 189) viewed either an educational video addressing common ST myths or a control video on human memory. Measures of ST myth acceptance and victim empathy were collected before, immediately after, and 1 month following the intervention. Participants also evaluated a vignette describing an alleged ST case and responded to items assessing empathy, victim blaming, and perceptions of the defendant's guilt. The intervention did not significantly reduce ST myth acceptance or influence vignette-based judgements, which may reflect a ceiling effect given participants' already supportive baseline attitudes. However, a protective effect emerged over time: participants in the intervention condition maintained supportive victim attitudes at follow-up, whereas control participants demonstrated increased victim blaming and decreased empathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"181-192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053908/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145795278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John R. Blosnich, Jeanne M. Ward, Melissa Perkins, Marissa Ding, Susan De Luca
{"title":"Exploring Bankruptcy Attorneys' Experiences With Clients Exhibiting Suicidality: Challenges and Recommendations for Suicide Prevention","authors":"John R. Blosnich, Jeanne M. Ward, Melissa Perkins, Marissa Ding, Susan De Luca","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bankruptcy and financial distress commonly precipitate suicidal crises, putting bankruptcy attorneys in potentially difficult situations with clients. This qualitative study explored attorneys' experiences with clients' risk for suicide and attorneys' recommendations for suicide prevention. Bankruptcy attorneys and trustees (<i>n</i> = 11) were recruited via outreach to attorney groups (e.g., National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys). Semi-structured interviews explored clients' distress, responses to clients' suicidal disclosures, and previous suicide prevention training. The research team established a codebook from transcribed interviews within Dedoose software, using peer debriefing and consensus building to iteratively identify themes. Nearly all attorneys had experiences with clients discussing suicide, but most did not know how to intervene. Common themes included clients' co-occurring stressors (e.g., divorce, unemployment), destigmatizing the bankruptcy process, and navigating attorney-client privilege. Major themes for prevention were correcting misconceptions about and destigmatizing bankruptcy and suicide prevention training that is sensitive to the context of the legal profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"193-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13053906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Before Arrest: The Effects of Rape Myths on Evidence Collection Decisions in Sexual Assault Investigations","authors":"Suzanne St. George","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rape myths related to victim behavior and credibility influence police decisions, contributing to attrition at the unfound and arrest stages. How rape myth influence earlier investigative decisions (e.g., interview witnesses) is unknown. Addressing this gap is important, because evidence-gathering decisions are critical for successful case processing. I draw on the focal concerns framework and use data from the Los Angeles Sexual Assault Study (<i>n</i> = 616; Spohn and Tellis 2014) to quantitatively assess the effects of rape myths on three investigative decisions: interviewing witnesses, conducting pretext phone calls, and interviewing suspects. These tactics were underused. As predicted, police were more likely to interview witnesses when victims were credible and cases involved “real rape” characteristics. Other hypotheses were not supported. Findings suggest that police need more resources for investigations and more training on the unique nature of sexual violence, types of evidence most useful at trial, and effective investigative tactics.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 2","pages":"265-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taking Fuel From the Fire: Regulating the Introduction of Rape Myth Infused and Irrelevant Evidence About Complainants in Rape Trials.","authors":"Susan Leahy","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article considers how victim-blaming and stereotypical attitudes about appropriate victim behaviour can impact upon the operation of rape trials, particularly by prejudicing a complainant's testimony where s/he can be portrayed as having departed from the stereotypical norm of a 'real victim'. While recommendations for tackling such attitudes within the trial understandably focus on extra-legal interventions such as juror education or broader societal awareness initiatives, it is argued here that law reform still has a role to play. Drawing on the jurisdiction of Ireland as a case study, the article considers how reform of the rules of evidence (specifically rules relating to the admission of sexual experience evidence and disclosure of personal records) might be reformed to minimise the potential for the introduction of prejudicial and irrelevant evidence about complainants which can fuel the influence of stereotypes about 'real victims' upon the trial process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147582734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeoung Min Lee, Hailey Hyunjin Choi, Sei-Young Lee, Jaegoo Lee, Joo Hyun Kim, Sangmi Kim
{"title":"Anxiety and Aggression Among College Students With High-Risk Adverse Childhood Experiences: The Role of Bullying Perpetration.","authors":"Jeoung Min Lee, Hailey Hyunjin Choi, Sei-Young Lee, Jaegoo Lee, Joo Hyun Kim, Sangmi Kim","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the potential associations between anxiety and aggressive behaviors in college students with high-risk adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and explores how this relationship may be influenced by bullying perpetration, applying general strain theory. A sample of 282 college students aged 19 to 29 (M<sub>age</sub> = 21.59, SD<sub>age</sub> = 2.48; 74.5% female; 66.3% White) was analyzed. Results indicated a positive association between anxiety and aggressive behaviors among college students with high-risk ACEs. Higher levels of anxiety were linked to increased bullying perpetration, which, in turn, was associated with greater aggressive behaviors. These findings suggest that college students with high-risk ACEs who experience negative emotions, such as anxiety, are more likely to engage in bullying perpetration, which subsequently contributes to higher levels of aggressive behaviors. To mitigate the consequences of delinquency (e.g., bullying perpetration and aggressive behaviors), ongoing attention and intervention from school personnel, social workers, human service professionals, community leaders, and policymakers are essential to supporting and protecting students with high-risk ACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}