{"title":"A survey on the current status of AI literacy lectures in China’s university libraries under the AIGC background","authors":"Yubing Wu , Yifeng Lin , Yingying Liu , Yuer Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103111","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper selects the top 40 universities in the 2025 QS World University Rankings (including 41 tied universities) and 42 “Double First-Class” university libraries in China as research objects, and conducts an empirical study on their AI literacy lecture training activities (including lectures, seminars, etc.). By combining quantitative statistics (structured data such as activity name, sponsor, audience characteristics, and organizational form) with qualitative analysis (text mining of lecture training content), the current status of AI literacy lecture training in their university libraries is systematically examined. The study found that China’s “Double First-Class” university libraries have the following prominent problems in AI literacy lecture training: the degree of attention and implementation strength are different, the participation of librarians is low, lecture training mainly relies on teachers outside the library, the lecture training content is unbalanced, there is a lack of AI cognition and AI ethics, AI lecture training lacks systematicness, and AI skills education is out of touch with practical applications. Based on an international comparative perspective, the paper proposes eight optimization strategies: Strengthen the emphasis and implementation of AI literacy lecture training, provide continuous AI literacy lecture training for librarians and strengthen the construction of AI-Literate librarians, improve AI lecture training content and strengthen AI cognition and AI ethics education, establishing the AI workshop series: achieving systematic and comprehensive craining, increase AI practice components, holding geneAI research cafe, and cooperate with multiple institutions to organize AI lecture training, in order to provide practical reference for the innovative development of AI literacy education system in university libraries around the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144711240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding first-year university student information seeking through the theory of planned behaviour: A transnational perspective","authors":"Laura Dee Barber , Philip J. Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103096","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103096","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Information literacy (IL) development in higher education requires understanding how students form their research behaviours. This is important in transnational settings, where students arrive with different expectations of academic practice. This study applies the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) as a theoretical lens to analyse first-year undergraduate students' intended information-seeking actions at a British university branch campus in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Data was collected from 151 first-year undergraduate students from nine disciplines who described how they intended to find, use, and manage information for their assignments. Well-established frameworks are used alongside the TPB constructs of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control to investigate students' research approaches. Data underwent a reflexive process, revealing patterns in how students navigate between the expectations of a Western academic institution and their existing research practices. Findings suggest that students demonstrating high perceived behavioural control often align strongly with institutional norms, particularly in evaluating sources and research strategies. However, many students display a hybrid approach, combining pre-university habits with newly acquired academic practices. The study contributes to understanding how students develop research intentions and behaviours in their early university experience, offering insights for targeted information literacy support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144262221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanette Aprile , Danielle Aloia , Deborah A. Crooke , Marie T. Ascher
{"title":"The question of textbooks in academic libraries: To purchase or not? A scoping review","authors":"Jeanette Aprile , Danielle Aloia , Deborah A. Crooke , Marie T. Ascher","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103127","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103127","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this scoping review is to assist libraries in developing a collection policy for course-required textbooks informed by themes and outcomes recognized in the existing body of research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The team did an environmental scan, constructed a comprehensive search strategy in six databases, and conducted hand and cited-reference searching. Included papers were quantitative or qualitative studies with outcomes described and mapped to prevailing themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine hundred twenty-three records were identified via database and cited reference searching. After deduplication, 760 records were screened, and 675 records were excluded. 85 full-text records were retrieved and after review, 29 records were further excluded. Fifty-six studies were included for review, most of which were case studies. Thirteen recurring themes were identified and grouped.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Libraries are increasingly enlisted in wider academic strategies to make education more affordable for students. Course reserves programs are often initiated or expanded at the request of student groups, sometimes motivating financial support from administration. Published studies have focused primarily on undergraduate settings. The scoping review provides recommendations for the development and management of textbook collections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144932218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The power of inclusive practices in academic libraries for LGBTQIA+ communities","authors":"Vanessa Kitzie, Caroline Crouse","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103086","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103086","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates the experiences of LGBTQIA+ academic library patrons with reference librarians and other staff to identify strategies for improving services and communication. Through qualitative interviews with ten LGBTQIA+ students at a Southeastern university, findings highlight positive and negative interactions with library staff, focusing on factors such as body language, language use, and implicit biases. The research identifies key barriers, including outdated cataloging practices, limited visible LGBTQIA+ support, and discomfort in approaching staff. It emphasizes the importance of proactive librarian engagement through inclusive language, cultural humility training, and outreach to LGBTQIA+ student organizations. Participants recommend libraries host relevant events, expand LGBTQIA+-focused resources, and improve structural processes like name change procedures. Findings addresses critical research gaps, such as the limited exploration of LGBTQIA+ students' experiences in academic libraries and the absence of detailed analyses of librarian behaviors reflecting cultural humility. By investigating these gaps, findings contribute to understanding how librarian-patron dynamics, including power imbalances, influence students' comfort and access to resources. Findings conclude that fostering inclusive practices and positive librarian-student relationships is vital for reducing information barriers and enhancing the library experience for LGBTQIA+ patrons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144212264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jingfeng Cui , Dejun Zheng , Wei Cheng , Jianghan Shi
{"title":"A dynamic perspective-based study on constructing an evaluation model for smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries","authors":"Jingfeng Cui , Dejun Zheng , Wei Cheng , Jianghan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103128","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103128","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A rigorous and effective evaluation of smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries is essential for informed decision-making and resource optimization, serving as a foundation for rational planning, the advancement of smartification, and the fulfillment of diverse user needs in the digital era. However, most existing studies rely on static evaluation methods, which are insufficient to capture the dynamic patterns and trends of service quality and lack effective monitoring tools in the context of evolving technologies and user demands. To address this gap, this study introduces a system dynamics approach to construct a dynamic evaluation model for smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries. The proposed model comprises three interrelated dimensions—service support, service content, and service effect—each represented by a set of quantifiable indicators. Causal loop diagrams and stock-flow models are employed to characterize the interactions and feedback mechanisms among these indicators. The results demonstrate that the model effectively captures the evolution process of service quality and provides a scientific basis and practical guidance for resource allocation, service optimization, and the advancement of smartification in academic libraries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145009965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evidence-based shared agendas for scholarship on teaching with primary sources: Reflections on a bibliometric analysis","authors":"Jen Hoyer , Anne Bahde","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores how scholarship about teaching with primary sources (TPS) has evolved over time and what future directions past work might suggests. Using bibliometric analysis and visualization tools, we examined how TPS work has grown; what fields and disciplines focus on this work; key themes and issues; and what scholarship has been influential to the field. These insights led to reflections on disconnects across the field, considerations for publishing about TPS, and the potential of pedagogical standards and guidelines. Finally, this article concludes with recommendations on how this analysis points to possibilities for shared education, space, conversation, and products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144570313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Navigating a house with many rooms: A discipline-based approach to assessing digital scholarship","authors":"Adam Clemons","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103121","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103121","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As academic libraries seek to expand support for digital scholarship, soliciting input from users is critical. Traditional strategies for assessing user needs and expectations have assumed shared understandings across academic disciplines about how digital scholarship is used and defined, leading to evaluation methods that target user groups based on status rather than disciplinary affiliation. While this traditional approach has provided useful feedback to libraries, the results are not always accurate and dependable. To address this issue, the following paper reports on a discipline-specific approach to assessing user needs and expectations that accounts for disciplinary-differences in how digital scholarship is used and understood. The results, which are more accurate and dependable, can be used to address discipline-specific user needs while also facilitating better engagement with targeted user groups to facilitate and develop new and improved library digital scholarship services, resulting in increased user interest and participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144863973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
LeEtta Schmidt, Evan Fruehauf, Andrew Beman-Cavallaro
{"title":"Becoming a leader in AI literacy instruction by not reinventing the wheel","authors":"LeEtta Schmidt, Evan Fruehauf, Andrew Beman-Cavallaro","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103117","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Libraries are at a critical moment to lead in AI literacy, but success doesn't demand starting from scratch. By building on familiar frameworks for information literacy, outreach, and instructional design, libraries can quickly and effectively meet the challenges of generative AI. This article showcases how one research-intensive university library leveraged existing strengths—through AI-focused guides, workshops, grants, and cross-campus partnerships—to embed AI literacy across its academic community. Rather than reinventing the wheel, the library expanded proven methods to support ethical, critical, and informed engagement with AI technologies. This case study offers a practical, scalable model for any library seeking to empower users and stake a leadership role in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144766833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meng Wang , Chuanliang Zeng , Lei Xu , Honglei Sun
{"title":"Meeting the digital literacy education needs of college students: A two-stage study in China","authors":"Meng Wang , Chuanliang Zeng , Lei Xu , Honglei Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103084","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103084","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To identify what specific pedagogical and infrastructural components college students need in digital literacy education and to what extent they require these components, as well as to reveal how these components can be integrated into diverse configurations to enhance students' perceived digital literacy levels, we conducted a two-stage study. In the first stage, inspired by DigComp 2.2 digital literacy framework, we established a model of digital literacy education components for college students and then applied the Kano model to categorize 23 types of components of digital literacy education needs of college students into four categories: “Must-be,” “One-dimensional,” “Attractive,” and “Indifferent.” In the second stage, we employed the Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method to validate the findings from the first stage and explore how different configurations of digital literacy components impact the improvement of college students' digital literacy. We identified three key configurations: “management-service-driven,” “multi-dimensional collaboration,” and “facility-service-driven.” These configurations consider curriculum design, support management, space facilities, diversified services, and the absence of extracurricular activities as core conditions. Finally, this study proposed strategic recommendations that support the enhancement and optimization of digital literacy education in higher education settings. This study yields both theoretical and practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144255013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ye Yuan, A.M.K. Yanti Idaya, A. Noorhidawati, Yi-Shuai Xu, Guan Wang
{"title":"Unveiling the dynamics of research data management: Insights from bibliometric and BERTopic analysis","authors":"Ye Yuan, A.M.K. Yanti Idaya, A. Noorhidawati, Yi-Shuai Xu, Guan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103126","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103126","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the continuous progress of open science and the refinement of research data policies, research data management has become an important component of the modern scientific ecosystem. This study aims to: (i) systematically analyze the publication characteristics of RDM-related research, (ii) identify its key research topics and to reveal its semantic structures and thematic features. To achieve this, a combination of bibliometric analysis and BERTopic-based topic modeling was applied to 1154 RDM-related articles indexed in the Web of Science database from 2005 to 2024. The results show a notable increase in RDM research outputs since the FAIR principles were introduced in 2016, with journals coming from the fields of library science, information science, and medical informatics highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of the field. Analysis of international collaboration shows that the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany occupy a central position, with increasingly diverse patterns of global collaboration. The BERTopic modeling identified 18 representative topics, which were divided into four semantically coherent research directions: Cluster 1 focuses on institutional services, capacity development, and platform support; Cluster 2 focuses on data citation, research assessment, and collaboration networks, emphasizing the role of RDM in assessing impact and scholarly collaboration; Cluster 3 addresses data sharing, reuse and misuse, highlighting governance challenges related to data use norms and risk control; Cluster 4 covers open science strategies, open access publishing and journal data policies, highlighting how RDM is increasingly embedded in scholarly communication. This study fills gaps in previous reviews on subject hierarchy and semantic modeling and provides theoretical insights and methodological support for strengthening research data governance and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144908694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}