{"title":"Mnemonic evaluative frameworks in scholarly publications: A cited reference analysis across disciplines and AI-mediated contexts","authors":"Robert Tomaszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103113","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103113","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mnemonic evaluative frameworks have become central to information literacy instruction for assessing information credibility. Widely used tools such as CRAAP, CARS, ACT UP, and SIFT remain underrepresented in scholarly literature and insufficiently aligned with emerging information challenges. This study uses cited reference analysis in the Scopus database to examine 16 mnemonic evaluative frameworks across 280 peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and review articles. Citation patterns were analyzed by year, discipline, institutional affiliation, and source title. Findings reveal that while legacy models like CRAAP and CARS retain the most citations, newer frameworks such as SIFT and RADAR are proportionally more cited in AI-related literature. A subset of 49 AI-focused citing documents indicates a disciplinary shift from Library and Information Sciences toward Computer Science, Engineering, Business, and Decision Sciences since 2022. These results highlight the need for adaptive, systems-aware models that address credibility challenges associated with generative AI and algorithmic curation. In response, this study introduces the CAT Test (<em>Check, Ask, Think</em>), a three-part evaluative framework designed to help learners assess AI-generated content by corroborating claims, interrogating model reasoning, and reflecting on platform influence. The findings inform instructional design and contribute to ongoing conversations about algorithmic transparency and credibility in academic librarianship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144723432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"AILIS 1.0: A new framework to measure AI literacy in library and information science (LIS)","authors":"Michela Montesi , Belén Álvarez Bornstein , Núria Bautista Puig , Manuel Blázquez Ochando , Alicia Sánchez Díez","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103118","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103118","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more embedded in academic and professional settings, assessing and improving AI literacy among current and future information professionals is increasingly important. However, research in this area within Library and Information Science (LIS) remains exploratory, and more evidence is needed to guide training and curriculum design. This study assesses AI literacy among LIS students and librarians, highlighting key areas and groups for targeted training.</div><div>To this end, the AILIS 1.0 questionnaire was developed from existing AI literacy tools in higher education and adapted to the LIS context with expert input. It was administered to 163 respondents at the Complutense University of Madrid (Spain). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to examine gender and group differences. To further validate the findings, three focus groups with LIS undergraduates were conducted.</div><div>Functioning, Ethics, and Evaluation emerged as core dimensions of AI literacy. Functioning scores correlated strongly with all other dimensions except self-assessed Usage. Overall, library professionals outperformed students, particularly in Ethics and Usage. However, students, especially first-years, reported higher self-efficacy despite lower performance, indicating a tendency to overestimate their AI literacy, as confirmed by focus groups.</div><div>The research underscores the need for educational strategies in AI literacy and greater involvement of educators and professionals. The higher AI literacy shown by librarians should encourage professionals to take more active roles in AI literacy training. Finally, results highlight the potential of AILIS 1.0 as a diagnostic tool, but also as a framework to evaluate AI literacy within LIS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144852036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The experiences of neurodivergent Library and Information Science [LIS] professionals working in academic libraries – a case study","authors":"Clare Camp, Dr Jayne Finlay","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103115","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103115","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Literature on the experiences of neurodivergent LIS professionals working in academic libraries is sparse. Although anecdotal evidence suggests that librarianship may be an attractive profession for neurodivergent adults, significant challenges remain. This paper discusses a case study undertaken in a large research-intensive university in England. This case study investigates the experiences of neurodivergent LIS individuals, examining the impact of recruitment practices, the workplace environment, daily work and tasks, and their professional skills as perceived through the lens of neurodivergency. Qualitative data was collected through semi-structured interviews with six participants who identified as neurodivergent. A reflexive approach was taken to the research and thematic analysis used to analyse the results. This research finds that neurodivergent individuals encounter challenges with recruitment, the physical and sociocultural environment, and their daily work. This includes challenges with panel interviews, the sensory environment, the “unspoken rules” of social, professional expectations, and a conflicting desire for novelty and routine. Access to adjustments vary and are reliant on individual and institutional knowledge of neurodivergence, and the psychological safety required to disclose. Neurodivergent individuals are keen to use and develop their skills, however, employers appear nervous to discuss professional development opportunities. Although neurodivergent individuals are cautiously optimistic about their experiences, there is a need for increased understanding within the sector of their lived experiences to provide support. This paper puts forward recommendations for practice and identifies areas for future research that will help to improve the experiences of neurodivergent professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144756844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence adoption, perceptions, and ethical literacy among Arab academic librarians: A survey","authors":"Amany M. Elsayed , Majed Mohammed Abusharhah","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103083","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103083","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study explored how Arab academic libraries are adopting artificial intelligence (AI) and examined the awareness of AI ethical considerations from the perspectives of Arab academic librarians. It utilized a survey-based approach, employing a snowball sampling technique across 48 academic libraries in 17 Arab countries. The research instrument was a web-based questionnaire, which received responses from a total of 272 participants.</div><div>The findings revealed that 37.5 % of respondents indicated that their libraries use AI, with cataloging and generating metadata being the most common applications used by 43 % of libraries. The study highlighted several challenges to AI adoption in Arab academic libraries, including a lack of necessary infrastructure and staff training. Moreover, about 81 % of Arab academic librarians believed that intellectual property and copyright are the most important ethical considerations regarding AI. However, only 12% of participants reported having encountered ethical issues related to AI use in their library work. The results indicated that the primary actions taken by Arab academic libraries were offering face-to-face or online seminars and workshops on AI ethics, as well as providing ethical considerations and resources related to academic integrity through their websites. The study recommended that Arab academic libraries organize appropriate training programs to improve AI literacy among staff, develop the necessary infrastructure for AI adoption, and prepare relevant policy documents to guide the ethical use of AI technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144255049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Information privilege and ethical use of information: A study of undergraduate students from an information literacy perspective","authors":"Helmi Sasongko Adi , Heriyanto , Mohamad Noorman Masrek , Fajrul Falah","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103095","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Students possessing access to exclusive academic materials frequently encounter ethical concerns concerning the utilisation of these resources. This study examines the perceptions of knowledge privilege and the navigation of its ethical consequences among final-year undergraduate students at an Indonesian university. This research investigates how students' experiences influence their comprehension and utilisation of privileged information, based on the relational viewpoint of information literacy. A qualitative technique was employed to collect data through semi-structured interviews involving 15 students, which were subsequently analyzed thematically. The results indicate that students' ethical decision-making is affected by cognitive dissonance, empathy for peers, and a lack of information regarding ethical principles. These findings highlight the necessity for universities to offer specialised training on ethical information use, promoting a culture of academic integrity and responsible information practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144307132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Incorporating a family-friendly space into a university library","authors":"Lori Caniano","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103109","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103109","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic libraries provide support for student-parents in a variety of ways from providing activity kits for visiting children to offering family-friendly rooms. The author learned of the need for this type of support through conversations with students. A formal survey on library services and spaces was conducted. Respondents indicated it would be helpful to them if they could bring their children with them to the library. The family-friendly space in Swirbul Library provides an opportunity for student-parents to utilize the library while having their children accompany them. This article covers the steps taken to bring this space to fruition, from conceptualization, planning, implementation to current use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144721616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critical pedagogies in online instructional design within academic libraries: A scoping review","authors":"Mollie Peuler , Samantha Harlow","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103116","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103116","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping review examines the practice of Critical Digital Pedagogy (CDP), academic libraries, and online learning. From 285 initial records, 13 articles were included and identified three recurring themes with CDP: teaching, design, and Open Educational Resources (OER). Within those three themes, it was found that inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility (IDEA) were prevalent within all the records. This review highlights the need for continued exploration of CDP, online learning, and academic libraries, including how the COVID-19 pandemic and fluctuating state of higher education has made the combination of online learning, CDP, and information literacy teaching and design integral to librarians empowering patrons and students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144721617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Let's tell them what they've won: Assessing an undergraduate research award","authors":"Zara T. Wilkinson, Samantha Kannegiser","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103110","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Library-sponsored undergraduate research awards are a popular way for libraries to cultivate and celebrate undergraduate student research on their campuses. However, there is a lack of library and information science literature on ways of assessing these types of awards, particularly related to their impact on winning students. Using a multi-pronged assessment approach, the librarian creators of the Paul Robeson Library Undergraduate Research Award surveyed undergraduate students and award winners to determine ways of improving the general award announcement and application process while also developing a deeper understanding of the impact the award had on the recipients. In addition to identifying ways of elucidating the application process and removing barriers to applying, findings showed that winning the award impacted student success: winners self-reported being more likely to pursue additional academic opportunities and feeling more confident in their ability to perform academic tasks. Although piloted at Rutgers University-Camden on a small scale, these efforts could be easily scaled to assess programs that have existed longer or that include a greater number of awardees.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144656989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in academic libraries – a tool, a collaborator, an adversary? A Delphi study of university librarians in Poland","authors":"Małgorzata Kisilowska-Szurmińska","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103114","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Like many other institutions, academic libraries face the opportunities and threats associated with implementing AI. The practical application of this technology is decided by managers based on their knowledge and experience, for example, by introducing technologies that are common today but were once innovative, such as social media. The aim of this study is to learn the opinions and attitudes of academic librarianship experts in Poland, which reveal the potential and possible barriers to AI. Such knowledge will, in turn, allow for the building of competencies and the development of positive attitudes based on knowledge rather than prejudice or stereotypes. Due to the selected population, the Delphi method was used to collect data. Quantitative analysis of responses to questionnaire statements was applied, and the thematic narrative method was used to analyze comments. The results show a realistic (as of the moment) perception of AI as a tool rather than a partner in library work. They also reveal certain concerns and beliefs that may negatively affect the adaptation of AI in libraries. The knowledge gained forms the basis for recommendations regarding the process of implementing AI in libraries and, more broadly, in scientific communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144656990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A study of data-focused roles in leading North American university libraries","authors":"Ahmad R. Pratama","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103102","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103102","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the past decade, academic libraries have evolved to support diverse data needs, creating a demand for specialized data-focused roles. North American academic libraries are widely regarded as a global benchmark for developing data services, owing to their strong research infrastructure and extensive administrative support. This study examines how libraries at leading members of the Association of American Universities (AAU) staff and structure these data-focused roles. Using a combined approach of directory reviews, site-specific searches, statistics, and text analysis, the study identifies 321 data-focused roles across 71 AAU libraries at the beginning of 2024–2025 academic year, averaging 2.30 % of each library's total staff. Although generalist data librarian roles predominate, specialized positions, including non-librarian staff also play important parts in front-end data services. Results reveal no statistically significant differences between public and private AAU libraries in either the prevalence or percentage of data-oriented roles, suggesting that administrative priorities may outweigh funding models in shaping data services capacity. Text analysis underscores the prominence of more general data terms within job titles, reflecting a broad focus on the entire data lifecycle in most institutions, while some more advanced and niche technical skills are supported in a few institutions. Furthermore, this study proposes a three-stage model of data services maturity: (1) basic Research Data Management (RDM) essentials, (2) general data support, and (3) specialized data expertise, with most AAU libraries occupying Stages 2 or 3, reflecting their readiness to address complex data needs. For libraries worldwide seeking to initiate or enhance data services, these results highlight strategic considerations such as flexible hiring practices, professional development, and dedicated web visibility. This study offers a replicable framework for other academic libraries worldwide aiming to progress from foundational RDM to advanced data specialization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144549213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}