{"title":"Exploring attitudinal dimensions of electronic resource management in academic libraries","authors":"Winifred Bentil","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103144","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103144","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the role of attitudinal factors in academic libraries in the modern era with particular reference to the management of electronic resources in public and private university libraries in Ghana. It also aims to identify the underlying factors affecting the attitude of library staff in the electronic environment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-four library staff from two public and two private universities and three consortium executives. The findings identified various attitudinal enablers and hindrances to effective management of electronic resources in academic libraries. These attitudinal factors were generally common to both public and private case libraries. The paper provides recommendations to improve the attitude of library staff in this modern era. This is one of the few studies that considers the role of attitudes in the management of electronic resources in public and private academic libraries. The findings have practical implications, as understanding the attitudes and behaviours could inform appropriate strategies to improve stakeholders' attitudes for effective management of electronic resources in academic libraries to attract maximum usage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145159739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Library science literature, 2019–2025: An exploration using critical bibliometric methods","authors":"Nick Szydlowski","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study applies critical bibliometric methods to the library science literature published from 2019 to early 2025. It combines citation network analysis and text analysis in novel ways to identify clusters of articles focused on trends and practice areas, and to analyze the citation rates and centrality of those clusters within the network of library science articles. The study provides an example of how critical bibliometric methods can be applied to provide context and nuance when assessing the impact of research and interpreting research impact metrics. Themes identified within the literature include the COVID-19 pandemic, diversity, artificial intelligence, and social media, and the study notes differences in citation rates between these trends, with articles in the cluster focused on diversity cited at a lower rate than those focused on technology. While the study employs a novel weighting method to mitigate the impact of journal self-citation, the preliminary results demonstrate the susceptibility of citation-based metrics to gaming by authors, journal editors, and publishers. Critical bibliometric methods, like those used in this study can illuminate flaws and biases in widely-accepted bibliometric approaches, and point towards unanswered questions about our perceptions of prestige, quality, and impact in academic research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When the library closes: Assessing the academic impact on engagement, citation practices, and performance in first-year students","authors":"Narelle J. Coetzee , Kerrie Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103143","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103143","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2023, an Australian Tertiary Education Provider (ATP) closed one of its physical branch libraries. This study examined the library engagement, citation behavior, and academic performance of first-year students across ATP campuses from 2022 to 2024, to evaluate the impact of this closure on student outcomes. Using citation analysis from the final assessment of a core multidisciplinary subject, alongside final grades and borrowing data, the study found that students primarily relied on digital library resources. Citation patterns closely aligned with faculty guidance, and academic performance trended with their library usage and citation patterns. Finally, due to students' reliance on digital library resources, there was no clear impact on student performance with the closure of the physical branch library.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disciplinary differences in the online dissemination of doctoral theses: Evidence from France's theses.fr repository","authors":"Matthieu Cisel, Pauline Antognelli","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103136","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103136","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the online visibility of doctoral theses deposited in the French national repository <em>theses.fr</em>. We collected metadata and traffic statistics (views and downloads) for 99,743 manuscripts defended between 2010 and 2019, using a Python web scraper. Because the repository's coverage and uptake varied across disciplines and over time, we normalized traffic counts by year of defense and discipline. Results show marked differences: dissertations in law and education sciences achieved significantly higher visibility per manuscript, whereas those in computer science, physics, and biology attracted comparatively fewer readers. These differences were statistically significant and, when combined with an analysis of dissertation titles, suggest that topic accessibility to non-specialist audiences shapes dissemination. To interpret these findings, we apply Engeström's activity theory, modeling the contradictions doctoral graduates face between open dissemination and publishers' embargo or copyright constraints. For academic librarianship, our results underscore both the uneven disciplinary reach of Electronic Theses and Dissertations repositories and the structural dilemmas that influence graduate deposit practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Revisiting the relationship between information literacy and academic writing: Evidence from a self-assessment scale","authors":"Chengyuan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although information literacy and academic writing have been considered associated abilities in the higher education context, the degree to which these two abilities are associated remains inconclusive. To add empirical evidence on the relationship between information literacy and academic writing, the present study drew on graduate students' responses to a self-assessment scale that measures the abilities of information literacy and academic writing processes and examined their relationship at the integrated and individual process levels. The two integrated constructs are highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.815. The individual processes of information literacy and academic writing are correlated with moderately high to high coefficients, ranging from 0.548 to 0.755, which means that the processes of information literacy and academic writing are closely related. Evaluating and understanding information in information literacy processes are more associated with writing processes, suggesting that they are crucial in connecting these two constructs and making them an integrated process. This study is original in using a scale that treats information literacy and academic writing as an integrated process to reflect the real-world situation and goes beyond the textual evaluation of these two abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Binyad Maruf Abdulkadir Khaznadar , Lana Abubakr Ali
{"title":"The impact of academic library location on occupational efficiency: A comparison of the university's campus design","authors":"Binyad Maruf Abdulkadir Khaznadar , Lana Abubakr Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103137","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103137","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The university campus layout has a significant and continuous legacy as a place for education and learning. The academic library's location usually reflects its relevance to the university's campus. Understanding spatial factors can also help arrange academic libraries with the best locations for user satisfaction. This study examines the spatial configurations of educational campus buildings to determine how the library's location affects occupational efficiency and investigates the optimal architectural planning characteristics of university campuses that demonstrate outstanding library locations. The inspection employed mixed-methods analysis, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Qualitative data were collected through drawings, while quantitative data were gathered using Axial and VGA maps in Depthmap X10 to measure spatial and visual characteristics. The results show that spatial and visual connectivity, as well as prominent choices, influence campus design. A study concludes that, regardless of an excellent Isovist area, campus planning layouts require strong network paths for navigation. The study contributes to integrating the pedestrian planning network, mass functional distribution, and centralization for optimal use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145060751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Research data management in Universities in Kenya: Critical analysis of the legal and policy frameworks","authors":"Joel Nakitare , Salome Mathangani , Grace Kamau","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103139","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103139","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Even though universities generate a large amount of research data, many still face significant challenges in managing it due to inadequate legal and policy frameworks. This study aimed to critically analyse the legal and policy frameworks governing RDM in Kenyan universities to determine the maturity level using the Capability Maturity Model and recommend actions to optimise data management. A qualitative approach was adopted by interviewing heads of libraries and research units. Additionally, a bibliographic analysis of selected legal instruments at the national level and institutional research-affiliated policies was conducted. The review revealed the absence of a single national legal framework for RDM; instead, inadequate multifaceted laws exist. Key laws in the country with implications for data management include The Constitution of Kenya (2010), the Kenya Data Protection Act (2019), The Science, Technology, and Innovation Act (2013), and the Commission for University Act (2012). None of the six studied universities had implemented an RDM policy at the university level, although one university had completed the development of a stand-alone RDM policy. The study strongly recommends developing and implementing a comprehensive RDM legal framework at the national level and RDM policies at the university level to address this gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145049853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jingfeng Cui , Dejun Zheng , Wei Cheng , Jianghan Shi
{"title":"A dynamic perspective-based study on constructing an evaluation model for smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries","authors":"Jingfeng Cui , Dejun Zheng , Wei Cheng , Jianghan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103128","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103128","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A rigorous and effective evaluation of smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries is essential for informed decision-making and resource optimization, serving as a foundation for rational planning, the advancement of smartification, and the fulfillment of diverse user needs in the digital era. However, most existing studies rely on static evaluation methods, which are insufficient to capture the dynamic patterns and trends of service quality and lack effective monitoring tools in the context of evolving technologies and user demands. To address this gap, this study introduces a system dynamics approach to construct a dynamic evaluation model for smart knowledge service quality in academic libraries. The proposed model comprises three interrelated dimensions—service support, service content, and service effect—each represented by a set of quantifiable indicators. Causal loop diagrams and stock-flow models are employed to characterize the interactions and feedback mechanisms among these indicators. The results demonstrate that the model effectively captures the evolution process of service quality and provides a scientific basis and practical guidance for resource allocation, service optimization, and the advancement of smartification in academic libraries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145009965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanette Aprile , Danielle Aloia , Deborah A. Crooke , Marie T. Ascher
{"title":"The question of textbooks in academic libraries: To purchase or not? A scoping review","authors":"Jeanette Aprile , Danielle Aloia , Deborah A. Crooke , Marie T. Ascher","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103127","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103127","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this scoping review is to assist libraries in developing a collection policy for course-required textbooks informed by themes and outcomes recognized in the existing body of research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The team did an environmental scan, constructed a comprehensive search strategy in six databases, and conducted hand and cited-reference searching. Included papers were quantitative or qualitative studies with outcomes described and mapped to prevailing themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine hundred twenty-three records were identified via database and cited reference searching. After deduplication, 760 records were screened, and 675 records were excluded. 85 full-text records were retrieved and after review, 29 records were further excluded. Fifty-six studies were included for review, most of which were case studies. Thirteen recurring themes were identified and grouped.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Libraries are increasingly enlisted in wider academic strategies to make education more affordable for students. Course reserves programs are often initiated or expanded at the request of student groups, sometimes motivating financial support from administration. Published studies have focused primarily on undergraduate settings. The scoping review provides recommendations for the development and management of textbook collections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144932218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Academic librarians in research competitions: A network analysis of resource provision and collaborative dynamics","authors":"Rende Li , Sumin Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103100","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As an important carrier for cultivating innovative talents and improving the teamwork ability of college students, more and more scholars have paid attention to university research competitions, but most of the previous studies have focused on how the design of scientific research competitions can better improve the effect of talent training, while ignoring what academic resources students are eager to obtain in scientific research competitions from the perspective of students, and what effective support can be provided by instructors such as librarians and professors in scientific research competitions. This study examines how academic librarians’ and professors’ resources and abilities influence scientific research competition collaboration, and explores AI tools’ supporting role. Three scientific research competition cooperation networks involving 40 consultants and 318 students between 2022 and 2024 were analyzed using exponential random graph models (ERGM). We found that students prefer librarians with strong information retrieval skills, literature resources, and library facilities, while valuing professors’ teaching experience, framework guidance, and progress control abilities, while librarians’ research experience, data resources, and professors’ ask disassembly and subject knowledge depth were not the characteristics that were considered in scientific research competition collaboration. Students with complementary competition skills tend to select the same advisors, with disciplinary homophily observed in advisor selection. For AI tools, reading/writing capabilities, code logic, conversational fluency, and translation features were most valued. The difference is that we found that the picture generation capabilities does not play an obvious role in the research competition. The findings demonstrate the distinct roles of librarians and professors in competitions and highlight the importance of skill complementarity in team formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 103100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145046124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}