{"title":"Academic librarian perceptions on conducting research","authors":"Jennifer Elaine Steele","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103154","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103154","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study explores the perceptions of academic librarians regarding their engagement in research activities. Using a comprehensive survey of academic librarians at colleges and universities across the United States regarding their attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities in the research process, the study seeks to identify key factors that influence the research engagement of academic librarians and assess how self-efficacy, institutional support, and mentorship contribute to research productivity and success. Examining the motivations, challenges, and support systems influencing librarians' research productivity, the survey gathered quantitative and qualitative data on their experiences, including factors such as institutional expectations, access to funding, research skills, and time constraints.</div><div>Findings from the study reveal that while many librarians view research as professionally valuable and necessary for career advancement, they often face significant barriers, including lack of time, insufficient institutional support, and limited training in research methodologies. The results underscore the need for enhanced professional development opportunities, mentorship programs, and dedicated research time to foster a stronger culture of scholarship among academic librarians. Through the study's findings, the researcher aims to contribute to ongoing discussions about how academic institutions can better support librarian-researchers. The findings have the potential to inform policies and practices that encourage librarians to actively engage in research, thereby enriching their professional development and advancing the field of academic librarianship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145363638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Revisiting the relationship between information literacy and academic writing: Evidence from a self-assessment scale","authors":"Chengyuan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although information literacy and academic writing have been considered associated abilities in the higher education context, the degree to which these two abilities are associated remains inconclusive. To add empirical evidence on the relationship between information literacy and academic writing, the present study drew on graduate students' responses to a self-assessment scale that measures the abilities of information literacy and academic writing processes and examined their relationship at the integrated and individual process levels. The two integrated constructs are highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.815. The individual processes of information literacy and academic writing are correlated with moderately high to high coefficients, ranging from 0.548 to 0.755, which means that the processes of information literacy and academic writing are closely related. Evaluating and understanding information in information literacy processes are more associated with writing processes, suggesting that they are crucial in connecting these two constructs and making them an integrated process. This study is original in using a scale that treats information literacy and academic writing as an integrated process to reflect the real-world situation and goes beyond the textual evaluation of these two abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145107697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of communication in consortial chat reference","authors":"Kathryn Barrett , Sabina Pagotto","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to identify relational behaviors and communication practices in an academic, consortial chat reference service, and compared chats in which the operator is paired with a local user and a non-local user. We qualitatively coded a sample of 374 anonymized transcripts in NVivo and developed key assertions about communication behaviors. Overall, use of scripts was high, and personalization was infrequent. Operators used a variety of politeness strategies, such as rapport-building, hedging, setting expectations, and using softening language. We found differences based on institutional affiliation: when dealing with a patron from outside their institution, operators used more scripts, were less likely to introduce themselves to the user, had more instances of repair, used different politeness strategies, impersonalized the speaker more often, and had more incomplete closing rituals. Across the service, operators strengthened relationships with users through self-disclosure and identity moves and weakened relationships through impersonalization. Based on these findings, we recommend that operators increase personalization and self-disclosure, limit the use of scripts, write from the perspective of the user's home library (using terms like us or we, rather than it or they), and complete closing rituals. These are relational facilitators that increase social presence, encourage rapport-building, convey authenticity, and communicate shared identity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145473719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From crisis to opportunity: Pandemic-driven outreach and the rising influence of academic librarianship journals","authors":"Marek Deja","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to assess the coercive effects of the global changes on the impact metrics of research in academic librarianship journals within the related fields of science, namely Library and Information Science (LIS). This is done by conceptualizing the pandemic-related changes as a coercive force in academia that accelerated the new needs for library research and practices, thus improving library research topics recognition in LIS studies. At the same time, the longstanding emphasis on academic library outreach serves as a stable anchor against these coercive pressures in scholarly communication. Using a time-series analysis and bibliometric data covering 2075 articles published from 2014 to 2023 in five core Scopus-indexed journals in academic librarianship, the study applies counterfactual estimation to measure unusual deviations in Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI). Compared with the no-pandemic projections, observed Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) rose statistically significant in Q3 2022 (0.478), and 0.538 in Q1 2023. The cumulative FWCI gain reached an increase of 79.9 % over the expected baseline—signaling a sustained post-crisis elevation rather than a short-lived random spikes. These results can serve as a meaningful, data-driven closure to the COVID discourse and a transition into a new opening for more forward-looking themes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145417629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Leveraging learning analytics to personalise academic library services for enhanced student success: A systematic review","authors":"Mthokozisi Masumbika Ncube, Patrick Ngulube","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103160","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103160","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In higher education, academic libraries are increasingly recognised as key sites for data-informed student support. Despite the growing interest in learning analytics, research in this area remains fragmented, with inconsistent methodologies and limited synthesis, particularly regarding the personalisation of library services. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review examines how learning analytics are operationalised in academic libraries to personalise services and enhance student learning outcomes. Guided by the Learning Analytics Cycle (LAC), the study synthesises 32 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025. It categorises data sources, including library usage logs, learning management system analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced interaction data, and examines corresponding analytical methods such as descriptive statistics, predictive modelling, and natural language processing. Findings reveal a strategic shift towards proactive, personalised interventions, including targeted information literacy instructions and early risk detection mechanisms. However, implementation is often constrained by ethical concerns, governance gaps, technical infrastructure limitations, and staff analytics literacy. The review concludes that while learning analytics hold transformative potential for academic libraries, full integration requires investment in ethical frameworks, system interoperability, and inclusive policy design. Recommendations are provided to support the development of scalable, student-centred analytics ecosystems within library services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When the library closes: Assessing the academic impact on engagement, citation practices, and performance in first-year students","authors":"Narelle J. Coetzee , Kerrie Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103143","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103143","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2023, an Australian Tertiary Education Provider (ATP) closed one of its physical branch libraries. This study examined the library engagement, citation behavior, and academic performance of first-year students across ATP campuses from 2022 to 2024, to evaluate the impact of this closure on student outcomes. Using citation analysis from the final assessment of a core multidisciplinary subject, alongside final grades and borrowing data, the study found that students primarily relied on digital library resources. Citation patterns closely aligned with faculty guidance, and academic performance trended with their library usage and citation patterns. Finally, due to students' reliance on digital library resources, there was no clear impact on student performance with the closure of the physical branch library.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145108135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Faculty expectations and student skills: The research instruction gap","authors":"Jenna Pitera, Lindsay Bush","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103157","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103157","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional pathways for developing research skills, causing incoming college students to have widely varied information literacy competencies. This study examines the disconnect between faculty expectations of student research abilities and actual student skills and confidence levels in a postpandemic environment. Using cross-sectional surveys we collected data from first-year students and faculty members to assess research skill preparedness and expectations. Results revealed misalignment between faculty assumptions and student abilities. Students demonstrated highest confidence in mechanical research tasks like finding full text online but lowest confidence in analytical skills, particularly knowing when to seek help. Paradoxically, the skills faculty considered most elementary—keyword development, file management, and help-seeking behaviors—were precisely those where students reported lowest confidence levels. Faculty expectations regarding citation skills and database familiarity exceeded student self-reported abilities and experiences. The study reveals that pandemic-era disruptions have created a student population requiring more fundamental research instruction than previous cohorts of students. The disconnect suggests that traditional assumptions about incoming student preparedness are no longer valid. Academic libraries and faculty must recalibrate expectations, explicitly teach foundational competencies, and reimagine information literacy instruction to bridge the novice-expert knowledge gap in an increasingly complex information landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145417631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"E-book vendors as platform intermediaries for academic libraries and scholarly publishers: a critical discourse analysis of e-book vendors' webpages","authors":"Mei Zhang , Darshai Hollie","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103147","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103147","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the intermediary roles of e-book vendors when connecting academic libraries as customers and scholarly publishers as content providers through the lens of platform theories. As the first step of a larger project on e-book vendors' platform governance strategies, it conducts a critical discourse analysis of webpages from six vendors in the humanities and social sciences. The analysis reveals the similarities and differences in vendors' self-identifications towards different audiences and their strategies to attract libraries and publishers. It discusses potential reasons for explaining the unbalanced number of webpages for the library audiences and for the publisher audience, and argues that e-book vendors adopt various strategies to balance control with empowerment of libraries/publishers. This study further identifies that two main commercial e-book vendors- ProQuest and EBSCO- are moving from content providers to information service providers, therefore impacting a wider range of scholarly communication activities. Theoretically, this study brings new perspectives from the library and information science to the broader platform literature. Practically, it helps academic libraries and scholarly publishers better understand e-book vendors' digital marketing strategies, which will assist them in making well-informed decisions when selecting vendors to obtain/provide access to e-books.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145268313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Research data management in Universities in Kenya: Critical analysis of the legal and policy frameworks","authors":"Joel Nakitare , Salome Mathangani , Grace Kamau","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103139","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103139","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Even though universities generate a large amount of research data, many still face significant challenges in managing it due to inadequate legal and policy frameworks. This study aimed to critically analyse the legal and policy frameworks governing RDM in Kenyan universities to determine the maturity level using the Capability Maturity Model and recommend actions to optimise data management. A qualitative approach was adopted by interviewing heads of libraries and research units. Additionally, a bibliographic analysis of selected legal instruments at the national level and institutional research-affiliated policies was conducted. The review revealed the absence of a single national legal framework for RDM; instead, inadequate multifaceted laws exist. Key laws in the country with implications for data management include The Constitution of Kenya (2010), the Kenya Data Protection Act (2019), The Science, Technology, and Innovation Act (2013), and the Commission for University Act (2012). None of the six studied universities had implemented an RDM policy at the university level, although one university had completed the development of a stand-alone RDM policy. The study strongly recommends developing and implementing a comprehensive RDM legal framework at the national level and RDM policies at the university level to address this gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145049853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing the alignment of university library collections with scholarly research outputs: UW-Madison case study","authors":"Weiye Gu , Chaoqun Ni , Anlin Yang , Xiying Mi","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the alignment between the university library's resources at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the research outputs from the scholars affiliated with the university. By comparing citations in university publications with the library collections, the authors seek to quantify the degree to which the library supports academic research at the university. This analysis involves extracting citations from research outputs, and compares the citations with library collections to reveal any overlaps and gaps. This study relies on data from popular bibliographic databases such as Web of Science (WoS), and the library bibliographic records. The project's merit lies in providing evidence-based insights for library collection management, enhancing support for academic research, and optimizing resource allocations in university libraries. Findings will inform strategic decisions in collection development, ensuring resources are closely aligned with the university's research needs. This endeavor will not only improve library services but also contribute to the broader scholarly communication field, offering a replicable model for similar assessment at other institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145362852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}