{"title":"Faculty opinion of subject librarians survey","authors":"Duane Wilson, Nate Cox, Emily Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reports on a survey of faculty members performed at Brigham Young University. The survey was a follow-up to a qualitative study of faculty members' perceptions of subject librarians (Wilson et al., 2025), and the survey questions were developed based on questions in the literature and findings of the qualitative study. Surveyed faculty members knew who their subject librarian was and appreciated them. They thought of the main duties of subject librarians as helping students and maintaining collections. Despite appreciating what subject librarians did, faculty did not contact them frequently. Faculty members considered library knowledge as the most important subject librarian skill, followed by communication and people skills. Formal requirements such as degree or status were not important to faculty. For subject librarians to be successful, they should focus on the needs and language of faculty members and strive to communicate with them when they need it and in a way that they will understand. The survey results supported and corroborated the results from the qualitative study, providing an additional method for verifying qualitative results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 103070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper reports on a survey of faculty members performed at Brigham Young University. The survey was a follow-up to a qualitative study of faculty members' perceptions of subject librarians (Wilson et al., 2025), and the survey questions were developed based on questions in the literature and findings of the qualitative study. Surveyed faculty members knew who their subject librarian was and appreciated them. They thought of the main duties of subject librarians as helping students and maintaining collections. Despite appreciating what subject librarians did, faculty did not contact them frequently. Faculty members considered library knowledge as the most important subject librarian skill, followed by communication and people skills. Formal requirements such as degree or status were not important to faculty. For subject librarians to be successful, they should focus on the needs and language of faculty members and strive to communicate with them when they need it and in a way that they will understand. The survey results supported and corroborated the results from the qualitative study, providing an additional method for verifying qualitative results.
这篇论文报告了对杨百翰大学教师进行的一项调查。该调查是对教师对学科图书馆员看法的定性研究(Wilson et al., 2025)的后续调查,调查问题是根据文献中的问题和定性研究的结果制定的。接受调查的教职员工知道他们的学科图书管理员是谁,也很欣赏他们。他们认为学科图书管理员的主要职责是帮助学生和维护馆藏。尽管很欣赏学科图书馆员的工作,但教师们并没有经常联系他们。教师认为图书馆知识是最重要的学科技能,其次是沟通和人际交往技能。学位或地位等正式要求对教师来说并不重要。学科图书馆员要想取得成功,他们应该关注教师的需求和语言,并努力在他们需要的时候以他们能理解的方式与他们沟通。调查结果支持并证实了定性研究的结果,为验证定性结果提供了一种额外的方法。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.