Housing Policy Debate最新文献_第9页

A Research Agenda Pending Revolution 等待革命的研究议程

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2173983

Lisa K. Bates

引用次数: 2

How Accommodative Are Houses in Trinidad? Implications for Older Persons With Disabilities 特立尼达的房子有多舒适？对残疾老年人的影响

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2169586

B. Parey, Leeann Sinanan

引用次数: 1

Who Benefits From Homeowner Tax Preferences? 谁从房主税收优惠中受益?

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2157218

Casey J. Dawkins

引用次数: 0

Responding to the Challenges of Preserving Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Projects: Lessons From New York City 应对保护低收入住房税收抵免项目的挑战：纽约市的经验教训

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2157220

E. Kim

引用次数: 0

Yes or Not in My Backyard (YIMBY vs. NIMBY)? The Impact of New Social Housing Construction on Single-Family House Prices in Quebec City (Canada) 是还是不是在我的后院（YIMBY vs.NIMBY）？新社会住房建设对加拿大魁北克市独栋住宅价格的影响

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2157219

Jean Dubé, François Des Rosiers, N. Devaux

{"title":"Yes or Not in My Backyard (YIMBY vs. NIMBY)? The Impact of New Social Housing Construction on Single-Family House Prices in Quebec City (Canada)","authors":"Jean Dubé, François Des Rosiers, N. Devaux","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2157219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2157219","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The development of new social housing faces important resistance by local population, a phenomenon knows as the “not in my backyard” movement. One argument from residents to oppose such project is the idea that new construction will negatively impact property values. This is what this paper aims to investigate. The analysis is based on a complete recension of the new social housing projects built between 2000 and 2020 and on single-family house transactions that occurred between 2004 and 2020 in Quebec City (Canada). A repeated sales model integrating a difference-in-differences estimator is developed to isolate the net price premium related to the emergence of a new social housing building while accounting for the possible heterogeneity impact related to characteristics of the building, including the number of apartments and the type of clientele hosted as well as the local characteristics, such as the spatial concentration of social housing buildings and distance to the city center. The results show a complex net price premium rent function that leads to mixed conclusions and has important implications for the development of new social housing projects.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41443766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

To Review is to Win, Win, Win 复习就是赢，赢，赢

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2167333

G. Galster

{"title":"To Review is to Win, Win, Win","authors":"G. Galster","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2023.2167333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2023.2167333","url":null,"abstract":"Providing a constructive, insightful peer review for a scholarly journal is a win–win–win activity. The authors win. The scholarship wins. The reviewers win. The authors win because a fresh, independent assessment of how the research was conducted and presented can only build their scholarly capacities. Although responding to critics is sometimes unpleasant, honest authors must admit that it typically makes them better analysts and writers, and makes their papers stronger and more influential. Scholarship wins because the creativity, analytical rigor, expositional clarity, and practical utility of a research project are enhanced when more minds focus on it. The imprimatur of peer review bestowed on articles imparts confidence that what is being read is legitimate science, not “fake news.” The reviewers win because the process helps them stay current with the latest research publications, theoretical constructs, analytical approaches, quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and substantive findings. Reviewing hones their skills through the process of evaluating manuscripts that may vary widely in their logic, analytical rigor, organization, and exposition benefits. This last dimension of winners is in danger of being overlooked. Some institutions of higher learning are pressuring their younger faculty to avoid performing peer reviews, in the misguided notion that it interferes with publishing their own work. A more enlightened approach would recognize that peer reviewing is an essential element of productive scholarship. All scholars, but especially emerging ones, and the institutions that claim to support them should see peer reviewing as exceptionally beneficial to authors, scholarship, and, yes, the reviewers themselves.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44301456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Special Issue Introduction: Gentrification, Housing, and Health Outcomes 特刊导言:中产阶级化、住房和健康结果

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2023.2167332

J. Gibbons, Derek S. Hyra

引用次数: 1

Using the Moving To Opportunity Experiment to Investigate the Long-Term Impact of Neighborhoods on Healthcare Use by Specific Clinical Conditions and Type of Service. 利用 "向机会迈进 "实验，按特定临床病症和服务类型调查邻里关系对医疗保健使用的长期影响。

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2021.1951804

Craig Evan Pollack, Debra G Bozzi, Amanda L Blackford, Stefanie DeLuca, Rachel Thornton, Bradley Herring

{"title":"Using the Moving To Opportunity Experiment to Investigate the Long-Term Impact of Neighborhoods on Healthcare Use by Specific Clinical Conditions and Type of Service.","authors":"Craig Evan Pollack, Debra G Bozzi, Amanda L Blackford, Stefanie DeLuca, Rachel Thornton, Bradley Herring","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2021.1951804","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10511482.2021.1951804","url":null,"abstract":"We performed a secondary analysis of the Moving To Opportunity (MTO) social experiment to investigate the impact of different types of housing assistance and neighborhood environments on long-term patterns of health care use for specific conditions and across different types of health care services. MTO participants, who were randomized at baseline, were linked to up to 21 years of all-payer hospital discharge and Medicaid data. Among the 9,170 children at the time of randomization, those who received a voucher had subsequent hospital admissions rates that were 36% lower for asthma and 30% lower for mental health disorders compared to the control group; rates of psychiatric services, outpatient hospital services, clinic services and durable medical equipment were also lower among the voucher groups. Findings for adults were not statistically significant. The results suggest that housing policies that reduce neighborhood poverty exposure as a child are associated with lower subsequent healthcare use for specific clinical conditions and types of services.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10038180/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9552128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Gentrification, Mobility, and Exposure to Contextual Social Determinants of Health. 绅士化、流动性和暴露于健康的情境社会决定因素。

IF 2.8 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2099937

Arthur Acolin, Kyle Crowder, Ari Decter-Frain, Anjum Hajat, Matt Hall

{"title":"Gentrification, Mobility, and Exposure to Contextual Social Determinants of Health.","authors":"Arthur Acolin, Kyle Crowder, Ari Decter-Frain, Anjum Hajat, Matt Hall","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2099937","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2099937","url":null,"abstract":"This study uses individual level consumer trace data for 2006 residents of low- and moderate-income neighborhoods for the principal cities of the 100 largest metropolitan regions in the US using their location in 2006 and 2019 to examine exposure to the following four cSDOH: healthcare access (Medically Underserved Areas), socioeconomic condition (Area Deprivation Index), air pollution (NO2, PM 2.5 and PM10), and walkability (National Walkability Index). The results control for individual characteristics and initial neighborhood conditions. Residents of neighborhoods classified as gentrifying were exposed to more favorable cSDOH as of 2006 relative to residents of low- and moderate-income neighborhoods that were not gentrifying in terms of likelihood to be in a MUA, and level of local deprivation and walkability while experiencing similar level of air pollution. As a result of changes in neighborhood characteristics and differential mobility pattern, between 2006 and 2019, individuals who originally lived in gentrifying neighborhoods experienced worse changes in MUAs, ADI, and Walkability Index but a greater improvement in exposure to air pollutants. The negative changes are driven by movers, while stayers actually experience a relative improvement in MUAs and ADI and larger improvements in exposure to air pollutants. The findings indicate that gentrification may contribute to health disparities through changes in exposure to cSDOH through mobility to communities with worse cSDOH among residents of gentrifying neighborhoods although results in terms of exposure to health pollutants are mixed.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187766/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9495379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Determining Gentrification's Relationship to Birth Outcomes in Metropolitan California. 确定加利福尼亚大都市中城市化与出生结果的关系。

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-12 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2125334

Audrey N Beck, Kyla Thomas, Brian K Finch, Joseph Gibbons

{"title":"Determining Gentrification's Relationship to Birth Outcomes in Metropolitan California.","authors":"Audrey N Beck, Kyla Thomas, Brian K Finch, Joseph Gibbons","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2125334","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2125334","url":null,"abstract":"There is inconsistent evidence as to whether gentrification, the increase of affluent residents into low-income neighborhoods, is detrimental to health. To date, there is no systematic evidence on how gentrification may matter for a range of birth outcomes across cities with varying characteristics. We utilize California's Birth Cohort File (2009-2012), Decennial Census data, and the American Community Survey (2008-2012) to investigate the relationship of gentrification to: preterm birth, low birthweight, and small-for-gestational-age across California. We find that socioeconomic gentrification is uniformly associated with better birth outcomes. Notably, however, we find that only places specifically experiencing increases in non-White gentrification had this positive impact. These associations vary somewhat by maternal characteristics and by type of gentrification measure utilized; discrepancies between alternative measurement strategies are explored. This study provides evidence that socioeconomic gentrification is positively related to birth outcomes and the race-ethnic character of gentrification matters, emphasizing the continued need to examine how gentrification may impact a range of health and social outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237677/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9584926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1