E. Benfer, R. Koehler, A. Mark, V. Nazzaro, A. K. Alexander, P. Hepburn, D. E. Keene, M. Desmond
求助PDF
{"title":"修正","authors":"E. Benfer, R. Koehler, A. Mark, V. Nazzaro, A. K. Alexander, P. Hepburn, D. E. Keene, M. Desmond","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article title: COVID-19 Housing Policy: State and Federal Eviction Moratoria and Supportive Measures in the United States During the Pandemic Authors: Emily A. Benfer, Robert Koehler, Alyx Mark, Valerie Nazzaro, Anne Kat Alexander, Peter Hepburn, Danya E. Keene, & Matthew Desmond Journal:Housing Policy DebateDOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713 In page 3, the sentence \"Although many states do not require a cause of action, evictions are usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, or criminal activity” has been replaced with \"The cause of action for an eviction lawsuit is usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, and criminal activity. Most states allow a landlord to terminate the tenancy without providing a reason at the end of a lease term, or at the appropriate interval in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, after adhering to a statutorily prescribed notice period.” In pages 12–13, the sentence \"California rejected the application of the moratorium in the state because its state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective” has been replaced with \"The governor of California stated that the moratorium would not apply in California because the state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective.”. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction\",\"authors\":\"E. Benfer, R. Koehler, A. Mark, V. Nazzaro, A. K. Alexander, P. Hepburn, D. E. Keene, M. Desmond\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article title: COVID-19 Housing Policy: State and Federal Eviction Moratoria and Supportive Measures in the United States During the Pandemic Authors: Emily A. Benfer, Robert Koehler, Alyx Mark, Valerie Nazzaro, Anne Kat Alexander, Peter Hepburn, Danya E. Keene, & Matthew Desmond Journal:Housing Policy DebateDOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713 In page 3, the sentence \\\"Although many states do not require a cause of action, evictions are usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, or criminal activity” has been replaced with \\\"The cause of action for an eviction lawsuit is usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, and criminal activity. Most states allow a landlord to terminate the tenancy without providing a reason at the end of a lease term, or at the appropriate interval in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, after adhering to a statutorily prescribed notice period.” In pages 12–13, the sentence \\\"California rejected the application of the moratorium in the state because its state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective” has been replaced with \\\"The governor of California stated that the moratorium would not apply in California because the state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective.”. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Policy Debate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Policy Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Correction
Article title: COVID-19 Housing Policy: State and Federal Eviction Moratoria and Supportive Measures in the United States During the Pandemic Authors: Emily A. Benfer, Robert Koehler, Alyx Mark, Valerie Nazzaro, Anne Kat Alexander, Peter Hepburn, Danya E. Keene, & Matthew Desmond Journal:Housing Policy DebateDOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713 In page 3, the sentence "Although many states do not require a cause of action, evictions are usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, or criminal activity” has been replaced with "The cause of action for an eviction lawsuit is usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, and criminal activity. Most states allow a landlord to terminate the tenancy without providing a reason at the end of a lease term, or at the appropriate interval in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, after adhering to a statutorily prescribed notice period.” In pages 12–13, the sentence "California rejected the application of the moratorium in the state because its state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective” has been replaced with "The governor of California stated that the moratorium would not apply in California because the state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective.”. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.