住房救助、贫困和物质困难

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Julie Y. Cai
{"title":"住房救助、贫困和物质困难","authors":"Julie Y. Cai","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2141581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article documents the antipoverty effects of housing assistance pro- grams and their relationships with other life circumstances. Using a novel sample of urban households, we examine how participation tra- jectories in housing programs (including Section 8/public housing and rent regulation) affect households ’ housing deprivation, income poverty, and other forms of material hardships. Employing a propensity score matching technique, we find evidence that individuals who remain in subsidized units are significantly less likely to experience rent burden, become homeless, or live in overcrowded environments. They also face lower odds of poverty than their eligible non-/past-assisted counterparts. However, we find that living in subsidized housing has almost no impact on material hardship. Also, we find no relationship between living in rent-stabilized housing and low-income households ’ material or housing hardship.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Housing Assistance, Poverty, and Material Hardships\",\"authors\":\"Julie Y. Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10511482.2022.2141581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article documents the antipoverty effects of housing assistance pro- grams and their relationships with other life circumstances. Using a novel sample of urban households, we examine how participation tra- jectories in housing programs (including Section 8/public housing and rent regulation) affect households ’ housing deprivation, income poverty, and other forms of material hardships. Employing a propensity score matching technique, we find evidence that individuals who remain in subsidized units are significantly less likely to experience rent burden, become homeless, or live in overcrowded environments. They also face lower odds of poverty than their eligible non-/past-assisted counterparts. However, we find that living in subsidized housing has almost no impact on material hardship. Also, we find no relationship between living in rent-stabilized housing and low-income households ’ material or housing hardship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Policy Debate\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Policy Debate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2141581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2141581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文记录了住房援助计划的反贫困效果及其与其他生活环境的关系。我们使用一个新的城市家庭样本,研究了住房计划(包括第8节/公共住房和租金监管)的参与轨迹如何影响家庭的住房剥夺、收入贫困和其他形式的物质困难。采用倾向得分匹配技术,我们发现证据表明,留在补贴单位的个人明显不太可能经历租金负担、无家可归或生活在过度拥挤的环境中。他们也比那些符合条件的非/过去得到援助的同龄人面临更低的贫困几率。然而,我们发现居住在保障性住房中对物质困难几乎没有影响。此外,我们发现居住在租金稳定的住房与低收入家庭的物质或住房困难之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Housing Assistance, Poverty, and Material Hardships
This article documents the antipoverty effects of housing assistance pro- grams and their relationships with other life circumstances. Using a novel sample of urban households, we examine how participation tra- jectories in housing programs (including Section 8/public housing and rent regulation) affect households ’ housing deprivation, income poverty, and other forms of material hardships. Employing a propensity score matching technique, we find evidence that individuals who remain in subsidized units are significantly less likely to experience rent burden, become homeless, or live in overcrowded environments. They also face lower odds of poverty than their eligible non-/past-assisted counterparts. However, we find that living in subsidized housing has almost no impact on material hardship. Also, we find no relationship between living in rent-stabilized housing and low-income households ’ material or housing hardship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信