Housing Policy Debate最新文献_第10页

Corporate Landlords and Pandemic and Prepandemic Evictions in Las Vegas 拉斯维加斯的企业房东与疫情和疫情前驱逐

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2125335

E. Seymour

{"title":"Corporate Landlords and Pandemic and Prepandemic Evictions in Las Vegas","authors":"E. Seymour","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2125335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2125335","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research on evictions has found that large landlords are associated with higher absolute and relative numbers of evictions, and pandemic-period filings have brought additional scrutiny to large landlords and corporate landlords in particular. However, not all large landlords are equivalent, and some may be more likely to evict based on the submarkets in which they operate, and the pandemic has likely altered these relationships. This study examines trends in evictions and filings associated with two particular submarkets, extended-stay and single-family rentals, through an analysis of case-level data covering the Las Vegas metropolitan area. Through a series of multivariate analyses, I find that extended-stay properties are associated with higher eviction rates than other multifamily properties during the 12-month period immediately preceding the pandemic. Extended-stay landlords are even more likely to file and evict during the first 12-months of the pandemic. The results are mixed for single-family rentals. Corporate and other large landlords are generally more likely to file and evict prior to the pandemic, but several are no more likely or even far less likely to evict compared to smaller landlords during the pandemic. This study concludes with implications for policy and research.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49424293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supporting the Housing Needs of Domestic Violence Shelter Residents: Considerations for Survivors With and Without Disabilities 支持家庭暴力庇护所居民的住房需求：对残疾和非残疾幸存者的考虑

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2125336

M. Ballan, Molly Freyer, Meghan Romanelli

引用次数: 0

Gentrification, Health, and Intermediate Pathways: How Distinct Inequality Mechanisms Impact Health Disparities 中产阶级化、健康和中间途径:不同的不平等机制如何影响健康差异

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249

H. S. Versey

{"title":"Gentrification, Health, and Intermediate Pathways: How Distinct Inequality Mechanisms Impact Health Disparities","authors":"H. S. Versey","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2123249","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gentrification yields a variety of effects, yet the mechanisms linking gentrification to health are unclear. Although quantitative research has helped to identify some patterns, the processes whereby neighborhood dynamics impact health are layered and span multiple levels of health—individual, family, and community. According to research describing large-scale drivers of health, inequality (e.g., income and social) is a significant risk factor for worse health, morbidity, and mortality. Drawing from an inequality-health framework, this paper explores how inequality created by gentrification (e.g., segregated pockets of wealth alongside relative deprivation) harms health and well-being. The current study presents findings from lower-income African American women across 20 U.S. cities, and examines pathways by which gentrification increases inequality and stress for residents living in gentrifying areas. Results indicate that gentrification contributes to both direct (e.g., material scarcity) and indirect (e.g., displacement, distrust, lack of belonging) pathways that impact health, supporting mediation via four major pathways. Implications for further research, theorization, and policy are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"6 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48270342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Did HOPE VI Move Communities to Opportunity? How Public Housing Redevelopment Affected Neighborhood Poverty, Racial Composition, and Resources 1990–2016 “希望六号”让社区走向了机遇?1990-2016年公共住房重建对社区贫困、种族构成和资源的影响

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2121614

R. Coley, Bryn Spielvogel, Dabin Hwang, Josh Lown, S. Teixeira

{"title":"Did HOPE VI Move Communities to Opportunity? How Public Housing Redevelopment Affected Neighborhood Poverty, Racial Composition, and Resources 1990–2016","authors":"R. Coley, Bryn Spielvogel, Dabin Hwang, Josh Lown, S. Teixeira","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2121614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2121614","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public housing is a key federal investment, yet it has suffered severe underfunding and decay. HOPE VI sought to transform public housing by improving housing quality, deconcentrating poverty, and enhancing economic opportunities. Using rigorous quasi-experimental methods and an array of geocoded annual national administrative data from 1990 to 2016, we evaluated the effects of HOPE VI redevelopment on neighborhood composition and resources. After matching HOPE VI and control census tracts, we used a new flexible conditional difference-in-differences technique to estimate average treatment effects on the treated, accounting for varying treatment start dates and durations. Results show that HOPE VI redevelopment decreased tract poverty by 2.9 percentage points, an effect that remained relatively stable through 10 years postredevelopment, and increased median household incomes with no indication of rising affluence. These effects were most pronounced in high-poverty and predominantly Black tracts, and where public housing experienced more costly redevelopment or transitioned to mixed-income. HOPE VI redevelopments did not affect racial composition or the presence of institutional resources, social services, or commercial resources (e.g., grocery stores, restaurants). Results suggest partial success of HOPE VI. Additional policy levers are necessary to increase public housing residents’ access to neighborhood services that promote economic opportunities and well-being.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"909 - 940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47178636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Who Lives in Vehicles and Why? Understanding Vehicular Homelessness in Los Angeles 谁住在车里？为什么？了解洛杉矶的车辆无家可归

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2117990

Christopher Giamarino, Evelyn Blumenberg, M. Brozen

引用次数: 2

Who Represents the Renters? 谁代表租客?

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2109710

K. Einstein, J. Ornstein, Maxwell Palmer

引用次数: 5

Eviction Court Outcomes and Access to Procedural Knowledge: Evidence From a Tenant-Focused Intervention in New Orleans 驱逐法庭的结果和获得程序知识的途径：来自新奥尔良以租户为中心的干预的证据

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2112257

AJ Golio, Grace Daniels, Russell Moran, Y. F. Southall, Tricia Lamoza

{"title":"Eviction Court Outcomes and Access to Procedural Knowledge: Evidence From a Tenant-Focused Intervention in New Orleans","authors":"AJ Golio, Grace Daniels, Russell Moran, Y. F. Southall, Tricia Lamoza","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2112257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2112257","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the legal eviction process, tenants tend to lack procedural knowledge about how courts operate and how to argue their case. Uneven access to this information tends to result in less favorable outcomes for tenants, including a mark on the tenant’s record that severely limits future housing opportunities. However, there are few—if any—quantitative studies that systematically examine the relationship between knowledge distribution and eviction case outcomes. This article focuses on the unique efforts of a New Orleans-based renters’ rights organization to contact residents facing eviction and provide them with informative resources on the eviction process. We follow the court outcomes of 267 cases, and analyze them using a quasi-experimental approach and a series of weighted logistic regressions. For tenants who were contacted, we observe a 13% reduction in the probability of receiving a rule absolute judgment than among those who were not contacted. Direct forms of contact (e.g., a telephone conversation) tend to have stronger associations with positive court outcomes than indirect forms (e.g., sending a postcard).","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49600581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

“You Have a Place to Rest Your Head in Peace”: Use of Hotels for Adults Experiencing Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic “你有一个地方可以平静地休息”：新冠肺炎大流行期间无家可归的成年人使用酒店

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2113816

Leah Robinson, Penelope Schlesinger, Danya E. Keene

引用次数: 6

Which Information Matters? Measuring Landlord Assessment of Tenant Screening Reports 哪些信息重要?衡量业主对租客筛选报告的评估

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2113815

Wonyoung So

引用次数: 6

Is Gentrification a Carcinogen? Neighborhood Change and Cancerous Vehicle Emissions in Los Angeles County 变性是致癌物质吗？洛杉矶县的社区变化与恶性车辆排放

IF 2.9 3区经济学

Housing Policy Debate Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2099936

Jared N. Schachner

{"title":"Is Gentrification a Carcinogen? Neighborhood Change and Cancerous Vehicle Emissions in Los Angeles County","authors":"Jared N. Schachner","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2099936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2099936","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Neighborhood disadvantage erodes residents’ mental and physical health. But whether rapid reductions in disadvantage spurred by gentrification attenuate or exacerbate these effects remains unknown due to mixed theoretical expectations and empirical results. To help clarify these dynamics, I propose a novel hypothesis that casts gentrification as a carcinogen. As neighborhoods receive inflows of affluent, White residents, influxes of private vehicles may come with them. In turn, stationary residents become exposed to higher vehicular emissions, and their risk of cancer—especially lung cancer—climbs. As an initial empirical test of these theoretical possibilities, I link Urban Displacement Project data identifying Los Angeles County neighborhoods that gentrified during the 2000s to tract-level data on vehicle ownership and cancer risk profiles—the latter from the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Air Toxics Assessment. Descriptive regressions that include a lagged dependent variable and municipal fixed effects suggest gentrifying tracts’ levels of cancer risk factors increased by ∼0.5 standard deviations more than those of disadvantaged neighborhoods that did not gentrify. Sobel tests of mediation indicate nearly half of this association may be explained by a pathway related to increasing vehicle density. The study thus motivates future research leveraging individual-level data and quasi-experimental methods to solidify whether gentrification is indeed a carcinogen.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":"33 1","pages":"47 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48192766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1