Correction
IF 2.8
3区 经济学
Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
E. Benfer, R. Koehler, A. Mark, V. Nazzaro, A. K. Alexander, P. Hepburn, D. E. Keene, M. Desmond
求助PDF
{"title":"Correction","authors":"E. Benfer, R. Koehler, A. Mark, V. Nazzaro, A. K. Alexander, P. Hepburn, D. E. Keene, M. Desmond","doi":"10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article title: COVID-19 Housing Policy: State and Federal Eviction Moratoria and Supportive Measures in the United States During the Pandemic Authors: Emily A. Benfer, Robert Koehler, Alyx Mark, Valerie Nazzaro, Anne Kat Alexander, Peter Hepburn, Danya E. Keene, & Matthew Desmond Journal:Housing Policy DebateDOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713 In page 3, the sentence \"Although many states do not require a cause of action, evictions are usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, or criminal activity” has been replaced with \"The cause of action for an eviction lawsuit is usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, and criminal activity. Most states allow a landlord to terminate the tenancy without providing a reason at the end of a lease term, or at the appropriate interval in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, after adhering to a statutorily prescribed notice period.” In pages 12–13, the sentence \"California rejected the application of the moratorium in the state because its state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective” has been replaced with \"The governor of California stated that the moratorium would not apply in California because the state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective.”. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":47744,"journal":{"name":"Housing Policy Debate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Policy Debate","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2157966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Article title: COVID-19 Housing Policy: State and Federal Eviction Moratoria and Supportive Measures in the United States During the Pandemic Authors: Emily A. Benfer, Robert Koehler, Alyx Mark, Valerie Nazzaro, Anne Kat Alexander, Peter Hepburn, Danya E. Keene, & Matthew Desmond Journal:Housing Policy DebateDOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713 In page 3, the sentence "Although many states do not require a cause of action, evictions are usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, or criminal activity” has been replaced with "The cause of action for an eviction lawsuit is usually based on nonpayment of rent, lease violations, holdovers past the lease term, and criminal activity. Most states allow a landlord to terminate the tenancy without providing a reason at the end of a lease term, or at the appropriate interval in a month to month or other periodic tenancy, after adhering to a statutorily prescribed notice period.” In pages 12–13, the sentence "California rejected the application of the moratorium in the state because its state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective” has been replaced with "The governor of California stated that the moratorium would not apply in California because the state-level moratorium, which did not include an income limit, was determined to be more protective.”. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
修正
文章标题:新冠肺炎住房政策:疫情期间美国的州和联邦暂缓驱逐和支持措施作者:Emily A.Benfer、Robert Koehler、Alyx Mark、Valerie Nazzaro、Anne Kat Alexander、Peter Hepburn、Danya E.Keene和Matthew Desmond Journal:住房政策辩论DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2076713在第3页中,“尽管许多州不要求诉讼理由,但驱逐通常是基于未支付租金、违反租约、超过租约期限的滞留或犯罪活动”一句被替换为“驱逐诉讼的诉讼理由通常是基于不支付租金、违约租约、超过租赁期限的滞留和犯罪活动”。大多数州允许房东在租赁期结束时,或在遵守法律规定的通知期后,在每月或其他定期租赁的适当间隔内,无需提供理由即可终止租赁。”在第12-13页中,“加州拒绝在该州实施暂停令,因为其不包括收入限制的州级暂停令被确定为更具保护性”一句被替换为“加州州长表示,暂停令不适用于加州,决心加强保护。”。©2022 Informa UK Limited,交易名称为Taylor&Francis Group。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Housing Policy Debate provides a venue for original research on U.S. housing policy. Subjects include affordable housing policy, fair housing policy, land use regulations influencing housing affordability, metropolitan development trends, and linkages among housing policy and energy, environmental, and transportation policy. Housing Policy Debate is published quarterly. Most issues feature a Forum section and an Articles section. The Forum, which highlights a current debate, features a central article and responding comments that represent a range of perspectives. All articles in the Forum and Articles sections undergo a double-blind peer review process.