Journal of Robotic Surgery最新文献

Evaluating the Sina _flex robotic telesurgery system for fallopian tube-like procedures: A canine uterine horn model feasibility study. 评估Sina flex机器人远程手术系统用于输卵管样手术：犬子宫角模型可行性研究。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03183-1

Vahid Shahbazi, Mir Sepehr Pedram, Alireza Mirbagheri, Dorsa Saneei, Ali Reza Shahmir

引用次数: 0

How do new arthroplasty surgeons incorporate technology into their practice? 新的关节置换外科医生如何将技术融入到他们的实践中？

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03385-7

Laith Bahlouli, Olivia Schaffer, Thomas Bieganowski, Anzar Sarfraz, Farouk Khury, Ran Schwarzkopf, Vinay K Aggarwal, Joshua C Rozell

引用次数: 0

Impact of surgical assistance by Japanese nurse practitioners in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery. 日本护士在机器人辅助冠状动脉搭桥手术中的手术协助影响。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03396-4

Tomoya Ohshiro, Makoto Hashimoto, Gentaku Hama, Naohiro Wakabayashi, Suguru Tatsuki, McAndrew Merlini, Keijirou Mitsube, Kazutoshi Tachibana, Yosuke Kuroda, Ryuji Koshima

引用次数: 0

Budget impact analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional spine surgery in Spain. 西班牙机器人辅助与传统脊柱手术的预算影响分析。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03315-7

Rubén Martín Láez, Fernando Álvarez-Sala Walther, Julen Monje, María Álvarez, Mehdi Zahra, Sofía De Pedro, Paula Castro Albarrán, Miguel Ángel Casado, José A Fernández Alén

{"title":"Budget impact analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional spine surgery in Spain.","authors":"Rubén Martín Láez, Fernando Álvarez-Sala Walther, Julen Monje, María Álvarez, Mehdi Zahra, Sofía De Pedro, Paula Castro Albarrán, Miguel Ángel Casado, José A Fernández Alén","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03315-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-026-03315-7","url":null,"abstract":"Robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS) enhances procedural accuracy and reproducibility by ensuring full adherence to preoperative surgical plans. However, its widespread adoption remains limited by the need for a substantial upfront investment. In this study, the economic impact of spinal procedures performed under the guidance of the Mazor™ robotic system was compared with that of conventional techniques from an advanced Spanish hospital perspective. A 10-year budget impact analysis was conducted. The target population included all spinal surgeries potentially suitable for robot assistance, estimated from published data and expert input. Two scenarios were compared: a baseline scenario without Mazor™ and a progressive Mazor™ adoption scenario. Unit costs (€, 2025), obtained from Spanish sources, were applied to components of health care resource consumption. Model inputs and assumptions were validated by a panel of Spanish experts. A deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) was performed to assess the robustness of the results. The number of RASS-eligible patients increased from 213 to 330 annually over 10 years (2,673 total). The mean cost per patient was €10,093 for conventional surgery and €9,082 for RASS, generating average savings of €1,011 per patient. Savings were driven mainly by reductions in the length of hospital stay (€1,523), revision surgeries (€793), and complications (€261), outweighing the Mazor™ acquisition cost. Over the 10-year horizon, cumulative savings reached €2.54 million, achieving full capital investment recovery within 3.83 years. OWSA confirmed the robustness of these findings. From an advanced Spanish hospital perspective, the initial investment in RASS is recouped within four years, supporting its financial sustainability and long-term economic advantage over conventional spinal surgery.","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13136191/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147822219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Global research trends in robot-assisted urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture disease: a visualized bibliometric analysis. 机器人辅助尿道重建治疗尿道狭窄疾病的全球研究趋势：可视化文献计量分析。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03379-5

Longtu Ma, Xiaoyu Huang, Long Cheng, Xi Xiao, Hua Ma, Zhilong Dong

引用次数: 0

Correction: Evaluation of robotic exposure among gynecological surgeons: results of survey from the young European advocates of robotic surgery (YEARS). 更正：妇科外科医生中机器人暴露的评估：来自欧洲年轻机器人手术倡导者（YEARS）的调查结果。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03368-8

Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez, D El-Hamamsy, E Karatrasoglou, A Amirthanayagam, A Muñoz Solano, C Chollet, D Galvin, M Manpreet Kaur, C Uwins

引用次数: 0

Global research trends in robot-assisted colectomy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. 机器人辅助结肠切除术的全球研究趋势：文献计量学和可视化分析。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03429-y

Yurun Miao, Danyang Wang, Jing Li

引用次数: 0

Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison. 胸外单孔机器人肺切除术后疼痛更少，恢复更早：倾向匹配比较。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03420-7

Nikolaos Pachos, Robert J Cerfolio, Costas Bizekis, Stephanie H Chang, Amie J Kent, Ming Liao, Michael Zervos

引用次数: 0

Mako robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty mitigates the impact of surgeon handedness. Mako机器人辅助全膝关节置换术减轻了外科医生惯用手的影响。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03434-1

Minjiao Wu, Jiayan Chen, Yaping Wang, Lingjun Jiang, Shujun Chen, Chenglong Wang

{"title":"Mako robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty mitigates the impact of surgeon handedness.","authors":"Minjiao Wu, Jiayan Chen, Yaping Wang, Lingjun Jiang, Shujun Chen, Chenglong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-03434-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-026-03434-1","url":null,"abstract":"Surgeon handedness may influence prosthetic alignment in conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM-TKA), but whether robotic assistance mitigates this effect remains unclear. This study investigated whether Mako robot-assisted TKA (MA-TKA) mitigates handedness-related discrepancies in alignment accuracy and perioperative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included 1160 patients who underwent unilateral TKA performed by three experienced right-handed surgeons. Patients were divided into four groups based on surgical technique and operated side: MA-left (n = 84), MA-right (n = 92), CM-left (n = 453), and CM-right (n = 531). Operative duration, tourniquet time, hospital stay, blood loss, and radiographic parameters (mechanical tibiofemoral angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, lateral femoral component and lateral tibial component) were compared. Outliers were defined as ≥ 3° deviation from target values. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. MA-left surgery had the longest operative and tourniquet times, while MA-right surgery yielded the lowest blood loss. Both MA groups had significantly shorter hospital stays and lower blood loss than CM groups (P < 0.001). Radiographic accuracy was superior in MA groups, with no differences between MA-left and MA-right for any parameter. In CM groups, left-sided procedures showed significantly poorer alignment and higher outlier rates than right-sided procedures (P < 0.05). MA-TKA mitigates the negative impact of surgeon handedness on prosthetic alignment, achieving homogeneous accuracy regardless of operated side. Despite slightly longer operative times, MA-TKA reduces blood loss and shortens hospital stay, offering tangible clinical value.","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13128775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147785795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Single-port versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a within-surgeon, propensity-matched analysis of platform-related effects. 单孔与多孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术：外科医生对平台相关效果的倾向匹配分析。

IF 3 3区医学

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-026-03428-z

Umberto Anceschi, Salvatore Basile, Gabriele Tuderti, Aldo Brassetti, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero, Alfredo Maria Bove, Simone D'Annunzio, Eugenio Bologna, Giuseppe Spadaro, Manfredi Nardi, Salvatore Guaglianone, Giuseppe Simone

引用次数: 0