Robotic adrenalectomy achieves shorter operative time than laparoscopic approach: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Atsunari Kawashima, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yu Ishizuya, Takuji Hayashi, Norichika Ueda, Shigeaki Nakazawa, Kentaro Takezawa, Taigo Kato, Koji Hatano, Yoichi Kakuta, Norio Nonomura
{"title":"Robotic adrenalectomy achieves shorter operative time than laparoscopic approach: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Atsunari Kawashima, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Yu Ishizuya, Takuji Hayashi, Norichika Ueda, Shigeaki Nakazawa, Kentaro Takezawa, Taigo Kato, Koji Hatano, Yoichi Kakuta, Norio Nonomura","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02882-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) offers advantages over conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), including enhanced visualization and instrument articulation. However, comparative data on operative efficiency in Japan remain limited, particularly during the early adoption phases. This study aimed to compare the operative times between RA and LA using propensity score-matched analysis while evaluating the feasibility of a reduced-port RA technique. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 255 patients who underwent adrenalectomies between January 2010 and May 2025. The patients were grouped according to the surgical approach (RA vs. LA). The data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, and complications. The primary outcomes were operative time and duration of pneumoperitoneum. Multivariate regression was used to identify predictors of prolonged time. Propensity score matching was controlled for confounders, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status classification (ASA-PS), tumor size, tumor histology, and surgeon's experience. Patients with RA had slightly larger tumors but experienced significantly shorter operative (median, 131 min vs. 168 min, p < 0.001) and insufflation times (95 min vs. 138 min, p < 0.001) than those with LA. Multivariate analysis confirmed RA as an independent predictor of reduced times (operative: - 22.26 min; insufflation: - 21.82 min; both p < 0.001), while tumor size ≥ 40 mm and pheochromocytoma independently prolonged times. After matching (n = 53 pairs), the RA remained significantly faster. In conclusion, RA achieves significantly shorter operative and insufflation times than LA even during its early adoption phase. A three-port RA approach is feasible without increasing complications, and reduced-port RA may further enhance operative efficiency while maintaining safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02882-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) offers advantages over conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), including enhanced visualization and instrument articulation. However, comparative data on operative efficiency in Japan remain limited, particularly during the early adoption phases. This study aimed to compare the operative times between RA and LA using propensity score-matched analysis while evaluating the feasibility of a reduced-port RA technique. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 255 patients who underwent adrenalectomies between January 2010 and May 2025. The patients were grouped according to the surgical approach (RA vs. LA). The data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, operative details, and complications. The primary outcomes were operative time and duration of pneumoperitoneum. Multivariate regression was used to identify predictors of prolonged time. Propensity score matching was controlled for confounders, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status classification (ASA-PS), tumor size, tumor histology, and surgeon's experience. Patients with RA had slightly larger tumors but experienced significantly shorter operative (median, 131 min vs. 168 min, p < 0.001) and insufflation times (95 min vs. 138 min, p < 0.001) than those with LA. Multivariate analysis confirmed RA as an independent predictor of reduced times (operative: - 22.26 min; insufflation: - 21.82 min; both p < 0.001), while tumor size ≥ 40 mm and pheochromocytoma independently prolonged times. After matching (n = 53 pairs), the RA remained significantly faster. In conclusion, RA achieves significantly shorter operative and insufflation times than LA even during its early adoption phase. A three-port RA approach is feasible without increasing complications, and reduced-port RA may further enhance operative efficiency while maintaining safety.

机器人肾上腺切除术比腹腔镜手术时间更短:倾向评分匹配分析。
机器人肾上腺切除术(RA)提供了优于传统腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)的优点,包括增强的可视化和器械关节。但是,关于日本业务效率的比较数据仍然有限,特别是在早期采用阶段。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配分析来比较RA和LA之间的手术时间,同时评估减少端口RA技术的可行性。我们对2010年1月至2025年5月间接受肾上腺切除术的255例患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。根据手术入路(RA与LA)对患者进行分组。收集的数据包括人口统计学、肿瘤特征、手术细节和并发症。主要观察结果为手术时间和气腹持续时间。采用多元回归方法确定延长时间的预测因素。倾向评分匹配控制混杂因素,包括年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、美国麻醉师协会-身体状态分类(ASA-PS)、肿瘤大小、肿瘤组织学和外科医生经验。RA患者肿瘤稍大,但手术时间明显较短(中位数,131分钟vs 168分钟,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信