Maximal anatomic bladder neck preservation at the prostatic origin (MANO) in robotic radical prostatectomy: does prostate size matter?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan
{"title":"Maximal anatomic bladder neck preservation at the prostatic origin (MANO) in robotic radical prostatectomy: does prostate size matter?","authors":"Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Pushan Prabhakar, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02880-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate size has traditionally been considered a determinant of surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes in radical prostatectomy. Larger glands often present challenges in bladder neck dissection, with potential implications for continence and oncological safety. We describe the maximal anatomic bladder neck preservation at the prostatic origin (MANO) technique, designed to enable safe circumferential dissection at the true bladder neck origin irrespective of gland size. This retrospective study analyzed 341 patients undergoing nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the MANO technique between 2017 and 2023. Patients were stratified into three groups by MRI-estimated prostate volume: < 30 cc (n = 83), 30-50 cc (n = 147), and > 50 cc (n = 111). Perioperative, pathological, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad/day, assessed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Larger prostates were associated with older age and higher preoperative PSA (p < 0.05). Mean operative time increased with gland size (165.2 vs. 191.5 min, p < 0.001), and hospital stay was longer for > 50 cc prostates (p = 0.003). Blood loss showed a non-significant increase with prostate size. Pathological stage, Gleason grade, and margin status were comparable across groups. Early continence at 3 months was similar (≈71% across cohorts, p = 0.607), with > 85% continent at 12 months in all groups. Biochemical recurrence rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.630). Complications were infrequent, with no ureteric injuries reported. The MANO technique enables safe bladder neck preservation across all prostate sizes. Despite increased operative complexity in larger glands, functional and oncological outcomes remain equivalent. This approach may standardize bladder neck management in RALP and support improved continence recovery irrespective of prostate volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02880-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prostate size has traditionally been considered a determinant of surgical difficulty and postoperative outcomes in radical prostatectomy. Larger glands often present challenges in bladder neck dissection, with potential implications for continence and oncological safety. We describe the maximal anatomic bladder neck preservation at the prostatic origin (MANO) technique, designed to enable safe circumferential dissection at the true bladder neck origin irrespective of gland size. This retrospective study analyzed 341 patients undergoing nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) with the MANO technique between 2017 and 2023. Patients were stratified into three groups by MRI-estimated prostate volume: < 30 cc (n = 83), 30-50 cc (n = 147), and > 50 cc (n = 111). Perioperative, pathological, functional, and oncological outcomes were compared. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad/day, assessed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Larger prostates were associated with older age and higher preoperative PSA (p < 0.05). Mean operative time increased with gland size (165.2 vs. 191.5 min, p < 0.001), and hospital stay was longer for > 50 cc prostates (p = 0.003). Blood loss showed a non-significant increase with prostate size. Pathological stage, Gleason grade, and margin status were comparable across groups. Early continence at 3 months was similar (≈71% across cohorts, p = 0.607), with > 85% continent at 12 months in all groups. Biochemical recurrence rates did not differ significantly (p = 0.630). Complications were infrequent, with no ureteric injuries reported. The MANO technique enables safe bladder neck preservation across all prostate sizes. Despite increased operative complexity in larger glands, functional and oncological outcomes remain equivalent. This approach may standardize bladder neck management in RALP and support improved continence recovery irrespective of prostate volume.

机器人根治性前列腺切除术中最大解剖膀胱颈保留前列腺起源(MANO):前列腺大小重要吗?
前列腺大小历来被认为是根治性前列腺切除术手术难度和术后结果的决定因素。较大的腺体往往是膀胱颈部清扫的挑战,具有潜在的尿失禁和肿瘤安全的影响。我们描述了在前列腺起源处最大限度的解剖膀胱颈保存(MANO)技术,该技术设计用于在真正的膀胱颈起源处进行安全的环向解剖,而不考虑腺体大小。本回顾性研究分析了2017年至2023年期间使用MANO技术接受神经保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)的341例患者。根据mri估计的前列腺体积将患者分为三组:50 cc (n = 111)。比较围手术期、病理、功能和肿瘤预后。尿失禁定义为0-1次/天,在3、12和24个月时进行评估。较大的前列腺与年龄和术前PSA升高相关(p = 0.003)。失血量随前列腺大小的增加而无明显增加。病理分期、Gleason分级和切缘状态在各组间具有可比性。3个月时早期尿失禁的情况相似(各队列间≈71%,p = 0.607),所有组12个月时尿失禁的比例为85%。生化复发率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.630)。并发症很少,没有输尿管损伤的报道。MANO技术可以在所有前列腺大小的范围内安全保存膀胱颈部。尽管较大腺体的手术复杂性增加,但功能和肿瘤结果仍然相同。这种方法可以规范RALP患者的膀胱颈部管理,并支持改善失禁恢复,而不考虑前列腺体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信