Adnexal mass management by minimally invasive surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anna Quian, Ann Marie Mercier, Allison Akers, Robert M Wenham, Hye Sook Chon, Mian M Shahzad, Jing-Yi Chern, Rahul Mhaskar, Mitchel Hoffman
{"title":"Adnexal mass management by minimally invasive surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.","authors":"Anna Quian, Ann Marie Mercier, Allison Akers, Robert M Wenham, Hye Sook Chon, Mian M Shahzad, Jing-Yi Chern, Rahul Mhaskar, Mitchel Hoffman","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02889-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates methods of specimen extraction, pertinent clinical data and pathologic findings associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adnexal masses. This retrospective cohort study includes patients with an adnexal mass who underwent MIS removal. The association of categorical variables with adverse outcomes was investigated using Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Four hundred and thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Surgical modalities included laparoscopic (n = 235, 53.7%), robotic (n = 165, 37.7%), and vaginal (n = 1, 0.2%). MIS was converted to laparotomy in 37 cases (8.4%). 203 (46.3%) specimens were removed vaginally, and 235 (53.7%) abdominally. Three hundred and nineteen (72.8%) specimens were removed intact whereas 119 (27.2%) were morcellated or drained 113 contained). Of the 6 uncontained morcellation cases, one was ovarian cancer, and one was a borderline tumor. For malignant histologies, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with specimen integrity (455 intact vs 12 morcellated, p = 0.207), route of specimen removal (31 vaginal vs 36 abdominal, p = 0.217), or use of a specimen bag (46 bag vs 21 no bag, p = 0.105). This study demonstrated that MIS is feasible in the majority of patients referred to our cancer center for an adnexal mass. Perioperative complications were uncommon. Management of the ovarian malignancies encountered in this cohort was not compromised by utilization of MIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02889-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates methods of specimen extraction, pertinent clinical data and pathologic findings associated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adnexal masses. This retrospective cohort study includes patients with an adnexal mass who underwent MIS removal. The association of categorical variables with adverse outcomes was investigated using Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Four hundred and thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Surgical modalities included laparoscopic (n = 235, 53.7%), robotic (n = 165, 37.7%), and vaginal (n = 1, 0.2%). MIS was converted to laparotomy in 37 cases (8.4%). 203 (46.3%) specimens were removed vaginally, and 235 (53.7%) abdominally. Three hundred and nineteen (72.8%) specimens were removed intact whereas 119 (27.2%) were morcellated or drained 113 contained). Of the 6 uncontained morcellation cases, one was ovarian cancer, and one was a borderline tumor. For malignant histologies, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with specimen integrity (455 intact vs 12 morcellated, p = 0.207), route of specimen removal (31 vaginal vs 36 abdominal, p = 0.217), or use of a specimen bag (46 bag vs 21 no bag, p = 0.105). This study demonstrated that MIS is feasible in the majority of patients referred to our cancer center for an adnexal mass. Perioperative complications were uncommon. Management of the ovarian malignancies encountered in this cohort was not compromised by utilization of MIS.

综合肿瘤中心微创手术治疗附件肿块。
本研究探讨了与微创手术(MIS)治疗附件肿块相关的标本提取方法、相关临床资料和病理结果。这项回顾性队列研究包括接受MIS切除的附件肿块患者。分类变量与不良结果的相关性采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。438例患者符合纳入标准。手术方式包括腹腔镜手术(n = 235, 53.7%)、机器人手术(n = 165, 37.7%)和阴道手术(n = 1, 0.2%)。MIS转为剖腹手术37例(8.4%)。经阴道取标本203例(46.3%),经腹部取标本235例(53.7%)。319例(72.8%)标本完整取出,119例(27.2%)标本碎化或排干(113例)。6例未包膜碎裂病例中,1例为卵巢癌,1例为交界性肿瘤。对于恶性组织,接受辅助化疗与标本完整性(455例完整对12例碎化,p = 0.207)、标本切除途径(31例阴道对36例腹部,p = 0.217)或标本袋的使用(46例袋对21例无袋,p = 0.105)无关。这项研究表明,MIS是可行的,在大多数患者转介到我们的癌症中心的附件肿块。围手术期并发症不常见。在这个队列中遇到的卵巢恶性肿瘤的管理没有因使用MIS而受到损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信