Journal of Applied Philosophy最新文献_第5页

Superlongevity and African Ethics 超长寿命和非洲伦理

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12788

Christopher S. Wareham

引用次数: 0

No Right to an Open Future 没有开放未来的权利

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12790

Joseph Millum

引用次数: 0

What I Really, Really Want: The Role, Nature, and Value of True Preferences in the Ethics of Nudging 我真正，真正想要的：在轻推伦理中真正偏好的角色，性质和价值

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12784

Bart Engelen, Viktor Ivanković

引用次数: 0

Old Enough to Carry, Old Enough to Vote 可以携带枪支，可以投票

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12781

Seana Valentine Shiffrin

{"title":"Old Enough to Carry, Old Enough to Vote","authors":"Seana Valentine Shiffrin","doi":"10.1111/japp.12781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12781","url":null,"abstract":"Japa Pallikkathayil persuasively argues that abortion prohibitions treat impregnable people as less than equal citizens, subject to different treatment than other citizens whose bodies are protected from compulsory service for the benefit of others. Pallikkathayil's argument could be modified to avoid a tension with arguments for conscription, to stress that democratic equality is inconsistent with requisitioning a citizen's body to serve the needs of another specific citizen. Pallikkathayil also contends that ‘[t]he changes we would need to make to our other laws and practices to bring them into line with restrictive abortion laws are intuitively unattractive’. To complement her approach, I contend that consistency would require that if we subject minors to involuntary pregnancy and labor, then we should enfranchise minors. We lowered the voting age to 18 on the grounds that if military conscripts were ‘old enough to fight’, they were ‘old enough to vote’. Abortion restrictions conscript impregnable minors and subject them to involuntary bodily intrusions, major life disruptions, and responsibility over life and death decisions. Old enough to carry; old enough to vote. If that conclusion is unpalatable because minors seem too immature to vote, then perhaps they are too immature to be forced to carry a pregnancy and to give birth.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 2","pages":"492-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.12781","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144140654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Self-Deception in Human–AI Emotional Relations 人类与人工智能情感关系中的自我欺骗

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12786

Emilia Kaczmarek

{"title":"Self-Deception in Human–AI Emotional Relations","authors":"Emilia Kaczmarek","doi":"10.1111/japp.12786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12786","url":null,"abstract":"Imagine a man chatting with his AI girlfriend app. He looks at his smartphone and says, ‘Finally, I'm being understood’. Is he deceiving himself? Is there anything morally wrong with it? The human tendency to anthropomorphize AI is well established, and the popularity of AI companions is growing. This article answers three questions: (1) How can being charmed by AI's simulated emotions be considered self-deception? (2) Why might we have an obligation to avoid harmless self-deception? (3) When is self-deception in emotional relationships with AI morally questionable, and can it be blameworthy? Regarding question 1, I describe being seduced by AI's simulated emotions as self-deception, where desires bias beliefs. In response to question 2, I outline two ways to justify a prima facie obligation to avoid harmless self-deception – instrumental and autotelic. For question 3, I highlight crucial factors to consider in assessing the blameworthiness of harmless self-deception, such as the emotional and cognitive competences of the self-deceiver, reasons for self-deception, and its consequences for one's predispositions, self-image, and other people. Moreover, I argue that the ethical requirement to avoid self-deception does not easily translate into attributing blame to others for being self-deceived.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 3","pages":"814-831"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.12786","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144647562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Racism, Speciesism, and the Argument from Analogy: A Critique of the Discourse of Animal Liberation 种族主义、物种主义与类比论证：对动物解放话语的批判

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12780

Kristian Cantens

{"title":"Racism, Speciesism, and the Argument from Analogy: A Critique of the Discourse of Animal Liberation","authors":"Kristian Cantens","doi":"10.1111/japp.12780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12780","url":null,"abstract":"Peter Singer's argument against ‘speciesism’ has served as the theoretical foundation for the modern animal rights movement. His argument is that the wrongs we do to animals are analogous to those committed against marginalized humans; that if we are opposed to one, then we should also be opposed to the other. Despite the argument's popularity, those historically oppressed groups to whom animals are compared have been critical of it, perceiving the analogy as dehumanizing. Animal activists have struggled to understand this criticism, arguing that the analogy is only dehumanizing if one believes animals to be inferior in the first place – which is exactly what they dispute. What they fail to realize, I argue, is that the disagreement cannot be reduced to a difference in what one chooses to value. It is, instead, fundamentally conceptual. To be likened to an ‘Animal’ is something different for they who have never been regarded as ‘fully human’ in the first place. It is only after animal activists appreciate this – the singular character of human oppression, how it differs conceptually from the injustice that animals can be subject to – that the building of alliances and the work of collaboration can begin in earnest.","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 2","pages":"652-667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.12780","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144140510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Changing Behaviour by Adding an Option 通过添加一个选项来改变行为

IF 0.9 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12782

Lukas Fuchs

引用次数: 0

Broomean(ish) Algorithmic Fairness? 布鲁姆（有点）算法公平？

IF 0.7 2区哲学

Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1111/japp.12778

Clinton Castro

引用次数: 0

Cognitive and Moral Enhancement: A Response to Gordon and Ragonese's Practical Proposal 认知与道德提升：对戈登和拉戈内塞实践建议的回应