Amanda L. McGowan, Madison C. Chandler, Matthew B. Pontifex
{"title":"Aerobic fitness relates to superior exact and approximate arithmetic processing in college-aged adults","authors":"Amanda L. McGowan, Madison C. Chandler, Matthew B. Pontifex","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100154","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100154","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aerobic fitness relates to superior math achievement, but the underlying reasons remain unclear. This study tested how more efficient processing (efficiency hypothesis) or enhanced allocation of cognitive resources (resources hypothesis) underly fitness-related differences in arithmetic cognition in a sample of 138 college-aged adults.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Participants completed an arithmetic task while pupillary measures were recorded prior to an aerobic fitness test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Higher aerobic fitness was associated with shorter reaction time for all problems and greater pupillary reactivity for problems requiring approximate and exact arithmetic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Superior aerobic fitness relates to greater cognitive resources available to execute exact and approximate arithmetic faster. Fitness-related differences in math achievement may be driven by the cognitive resources underlying arithmetic strategy. These differences may extend beyond educational achievement and affect the motivation to engage in health behaviors based on quantitative information. Thus, improving cardiovascular fitness has the potential to also ameliorate health numeracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100154","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38994193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of neuromyths among teachers in a Caribbean nation","authors":"Satyavi Bissessar, Farid F Youssef","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The current COVID-19 pandemic and proliferation of misinformation regarding science highlights the importance of improving general science literacy. The continued preponderance of neuromyths among educators is of concern, especially in lower- and middle-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using an adapted questionnaire, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among teachers in a small island developing state in the Caribbean.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two-thirds of the sample were unable to recognise at least 50% of the myths. Regression analysis<span> demonstrated that higher scores in brain knowledge and exposure to prior teacher-training increased belief in neuromyths. On the other hand, specific in-service training pertaining to educational neuroscience improved scores.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neuromyths are prevalent among teachers and appear to inform their teaching practice. Further research needs to be conducted to explore not just the prevalence of these myths but in what ways they may be impacting teaching and learning outcomes in the classroom.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100155","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38994191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conceptual knowledge of the associativity principle: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research","authors":"Joanne Eaves , Camilla Gilmore , Nina Attridge","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100152","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100152","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Individuals use diverse strategies to solve mathematical problems, which can reflect their knowledge of arithmetic principles and predict mathematical expertise. For example, ‘6 + 38 − 35’ can be solved via ‘38 − 35 = 3’ and then ‘3 + 6 = 9’, which is a shortcut-strategy derived from the associativity principle. The shortcut may be critical for understanding algebra, however approximately 50% of adults fail to use it. We review the research to consider why the associativity principle is challenging and highlight an important distinction between shortcut identification and execution. We also discuss how domain-specific skills and domain-general skills might play an important role in shortcut identification and execution, and provide an agenda for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100152","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38994190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julia M. Guerin , Shari L. Wade , Quintino R. Mano
{"title":"Does reasoning training improve fluid reasoning and academic achievement for children and adolescents? A systematic review","authors":"Julia M. Guerin , Shari L. Wade , Quintino R. Mano","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>Studies of children and adolescents suggest that reasoning training may improve both reasoning and academic achievement, but evidence and systematic evaluation of this research is limited. Accordingly, this paper provides a systematic review of the literature on reasoning training in order to describe current methods and evaluate their efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>METHOD</h3><p>A systematic search identified eleven articles—published between 1996 and 2016—that reported findings from thirteen separate studies of reasoning training effects on fluid reasoning (G<em>f</em>) and academic achievement in children and adolescents. Specific G<em>f</em><span> outcomes examined were analogical, deductive, inductive, nonverbal, and/or relational reasoning ability. Specific academic achievement outcomes examined were math and reading achievement. This paper reviewed studies utilizing both computerized and non-computerized methods of G</span><em>f</em> training.</p></div><div><h3>FINDINGS</h3><p>Findings from the review show that reasoning training improves G<em>f</em> (near transfer effects). Although less conclusive, when considered on balance, evidence suggests that reasoning training also improves academic achievement (far transfer effects).</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Research is needed to parameterize the effects of G<em>f</em> training on academic achievement, and in particular to identify moderators of training efficacy on academic outcomes. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100153","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38995689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amanda L. McGowan , Hope K. Gerde , Karin A. Pfeiffer , Matthew B. Pontifex
{"title":"Physically active learning in preschoolers: Improved self-regulation, comparable quantity estimation","authors":"Amanda L. McGowan , Hope K. Gerde , Karin A. Pfeiffer , Matthew B. Pontifex","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100150","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100150","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Providing physical activity during the school day may mitigate increasingly sedentary lifestyles among children. Young children may be susceptible to interference during learning and consolidation when performing physical activity concurrently with academic instruction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Preschoolers <em>(N</em> = 72, mean age 5.1 ± 0.8 years, 50% female) completed a quantity estimation task before, following, and one week after engaging in either a 20-min physically active or sedentary lesson. Physical activity intensity and volume were measured using heart rate and pedometer step counts, respectively. Off-task behavior was recorded prior to and following the lesson.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Children exhibited similar learning and retention, but an added benefit of physically active lessons was a 1900% step increase and a 58% reduction in off-task behavior.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Providing physically active lessons instead of sitting for extended periods of time in early childhood classrooms reduces sedentary behavior and improves self-regulation while not interfering with educational outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100150","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25583655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100148","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100148","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100148","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25585720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sharlene D. Newman , Erin Loughery , Ambur Ecklund , Cindy You , Hannah Von Werder , Firat Soylu
{"title":"Structured versus free block play: the impact on arithmetic processing","authors":"Sharlene D. Newman , Erin Loughery , Ambur Ecklund , Cindy You , Hannah Von Werder , Firat Soylu","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Block play is one type of intervention that improves visuospatial skills. There are multiple forms of block play and it is unclear whether they have differential cognitive effects.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Given the importance of visuospatial skills for mathematical performance, we studied the differential impact of two types of block playstructured (copying a block design) and free (building from imagination) on arithmetic processing, using behavioral and fMRI methods. Forty-three children aged 8.3±0.8 years participated (21 free play and 22 structured block play).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed that while both groups showed behavioral improvements, only the structured block play group showed significant improvements in both addition and subtraction performance. Additionally, the structured block play group showed increased activation in several regions linked to memory, motor, and arithmetic processing after training.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results inform choices for activities used in the classroom to improve visuospatial skills and suggest structured block play may be beneficial for arithmetic processing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25585719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Open schools! Weighing the effects of viruses and lockdowns on children","authors":"Manfred Spitzer","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review weighs the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 against the side effects of school closures on physical and mental health, education, and well-being of those affected by the school closures. Whereas short term effects – decreased learning and food security, and increased anxiety, violence against children, child labor and teen pregnancies – are frequently discussed, the long-term effects of school closures will be much more detrimental across the lifespan of the “Generation Corona”: Existing pandemics of inactivity and myopia, already affecting billions of people, are worsening due to less physical exercise and less time spent outdoors, poor diet, weight gain, and increased screen time during lockdowns, causing future increases of stroke, heart attack, cancer, and blindness. Socio-emotional complications of isolation, learned helplessness, economic and existential insecurity will include increased depression and suicide, decreased empathy and increased loneliness. Together with decreased educational attainment and economic productivity, the amount of ensuing increased future global morbidity and mortality justifies immediate action of school reopening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100151","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10756527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Approximate arithmetic training does not improve symbolic math in third and fourth grade children","authors":"S. Bugden , E. Szkudlarek , E.M. Brannon","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2021.100149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prior studies reported that practice playing an approximate arithmetic game improved symbolic math performance relative to active control groups in adults and preschool children (e.g. Park & Brannon, 2013, 2014; Park et al., 2016; Szkudlarek & Brannon, 2018). However, Szkudlarek, Park and Brannon (2021) recently failed to replicate those findings in adults. Here we test whether approximate arithmetic training yields benefits in elementary school children who have intermediate knowledge of arithmetic.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a randomized controlled trial<span> with a pre and post-test design to compare the effects of approximate arithmetic training and visuo-spatial working memory training on standardized math performance in third and fourth grade children.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that approximate arithmetic training did not yield any significant gains on standardized measures of symbolic math performance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A Bayesian analysis supports the conclusion that approximate arithmetic provides no benefits for symbolic math performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100149","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25583656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fiona N.Y. Ching , Winnie W.M. So , Sing Kai Lo , Savio W.H. Wong
{"title":"Preservice teachers’ neuroscience literacy and perceptions of neuroscience in education: Implications for teacher education","authors":"Fiona N.Y. Ching , Winnie W.M. So , Sing Kai Lo , Savio W.H. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Owing to the prevalence of neuromyths in education, there has been a call for more teacher training in neuroscience<span>. However, neuroscience is rarely featured in teacher education. This study investigated the neuroscience literacy and perceptions of neuroscience in education among preservice teachers in order to inform future development of initial teacher education.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>Neuroscience literacy of 968 preservice teachers and their perceptions towards applying neuroscience in education were examined using survey items adapted from studies addressing similar constructs. Rasch item response theory and </span>classical test theory techniques were employed for data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the preservice teachers had limited brain knowledge and subscribed to many common neuromyths but were positive towards applying neuroscience in education. General brain knowledge was the only predictor for ability to identify neuromyths (β = .564).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neuroscience knowledge can help safeguard preservice teachers against neuromyths. Neuroscience training deserves a place in teacher education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100144","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38359563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}